본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

지자체 기후변화 적응실무 발전방향 연구 - 생태계 분야 기후변화 적응 시행계획 수립 및 이행을 중심으로

A Research on the Development Initiative for Public Practices of Local Governments in Korea– Focused on the Local Adaptation Planning in Ecosystem Sector

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류환경공학

초록

본 연구에서는 생태계 분야 기후변화 적응대책 수립 및 이행 단계에서 정책 실무자에게 주어지는 정 보 현황과 수요를 파악하고 향후 생태계 분야 기후변화 지식 발전방향에 대한 시사점을 도출하였다. 우리 나라 17개 광역지자체 및 이하 기초지자체 생태계 분야 소관부서에서 적응 실무를 수행하는 공무원을 대상 으로, “생태계 분야 기후적응 지식기반 진단 및 정보수요”설문조사를 실시하여 실무에 활용되는 생태정보 활용현황을 분석하고 활용도 증진 방안을 제시하였다. 설문응답자 전체(231명)의 75%(광역 85%, 기초 72%)는 생태정보의 존재 및 활용이 적응사업 수행과 관련이 있다고 생각하고 있었으며 적응업무를 포함한 생태계 소관부서 내 업무 전반을 위해 생태정보가 필요하다고 응답하였다(광역 82%, 기초 72%). 그러나 실제로 국가 및 지자체에서 생산하는 생태정보를 업무에 활용하는 비율은 크게 낮았다(광역 28%-64명, 기초 18%-42명). 지자체 행정 실무자들이 현업에서 생태정보를 활용할 때 느끼는 주요 한계점은 생태정 보의 존재에 대한 인식과 업무 연계방안 등 정보 자체에 대한 사전 지식의 부족이었다. 이에 현존하는 기후 변화 지식과 생태정보를 지자체 행정 실무자에게 교육 및 홍보를 통해 전달하는 것이 급선무로 나타났다. 향후 지자체 실무자들에게는 지자체 정책 목적에 따라 생태계 보전 또는 주민생활 지원 사업 등 생태계서 비스 증진 측면의 활용을 동시에 충족시킬 수 있도록 생태계 현황에 대한 기초 정보와 지역개발 및 보전사 업에 활용할 수 있는 생태정보가 마련되어야 한다. 정보 활용체계를 강화하기 위해 생태정보 활용방안에 대해 구체적 가이드라인을 제공하는 동시에 이용활성화를 위한 제도의 운영 및 관리가 필요하다. 국가적으 로 양질의 정보를 제공하고 관련 정보에 대한 홍보, 업무 활용방안에 대해서 교육을 제공함으로써 지자체 의 적응지식 및 생태정보 활용역량을 강화시킬 필요가 있다.

Abstract

This study aimed at analyzing the current status and further needs of ecological information which is provided with the civil servants in the process of climate change adaptation planning in ecosystem sector and at providing suggestions for future development of ecological knowledge on climate change. Therefore, we conducted a questionary survey titled as “the knowledge-base and information needs for climate change adaptation in ecosystem sector” with the civil servants who are engaged with adaptation practices in the ecology related divisions in 17 regional local governments (RLG) and the affiliated basic local governments (BLG) in Korea. As a result, the characteristics of ecological information which is applied in public practices was analyzed and strategies for improved utilization was suggested. 75% of the respondents (RLG 85% and BLG 72%) were aware of the relativeness between the existence and utilization of ecological information and the execution of climate adaptation practices in ecosystem sector. They were agreed with the necessity of ecological information not only in adaptation practices but also overall affairs in the ecological related division in the local government (RLG 82% and BLG 72%). The current situation of utilizing ecological information which is produced from central or local government to civil affairs were only represented as 64 persons (28%) in RLG and 42 persons (18%) in BLG. One of the major obstacles that the respondents confront with when applying ecological information to public practices was deficit of prior knowledge on the ecological information itself, such as awareness of the characteristics of ecological information and the link with public affairs for adaptation plans. Therefore, delivering current knowledge and ecological information on climate change by educational and promotional method is an urgent priority to the civil servant. The future needs on ecological information for local government servants were deduced as basic information on local ecosystem and applied knowledge on local development to meet the biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services at the same time. The respondents expected not only the specific guidelines for using ecological information to apply on the adaptation plans in the relevant divisions of the local governments but also the institution where the usage activation of ecological information would be operated and managed to enhance the information utilizing structure in the local government. In the nation-wide, the capacity of local governments should be enhanced with adaptation knowledge and the application of appropriate information to the public practices by central government’s aiding with the better quality of information, its public promotion, and the applicability to civil affairs.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. UK climate change risk assessment evidence report, "Committee on Climate Change", UK Government, ~ (2017)
  2. Lindenmayer DB, "Conservation strategies in response to rapid climate change: Australia as a case study", Biol. Conser, 143, pp.1587~1593 (2010)
  3. Defra, "Climate change risk assessment for the biodiversity and ecosystem services sector", ~ (2012)
  4. UK climate change risk assessment, "Defra", ~ (2017)
  5. 김동현, "니즈평가 기법을 활용한 기후변화 적응역량 평가", 환경정책, 24(3), pp.51~72 (2016), 한국환경정책학회[DOI]
  6. 오도교, "기후변화대응정책에 대한 시민들의 인식 분석 - 대전광역시 산림부분 정책을 중심으로 -", Korean Journal of Agricultural Science, 37(1), pp.19~25 (2010), 농업과학연구소
  7. The National Adaptation Programme, "HMGovernment.", UK Government, ~ (2013)
  8. De Koning J, "Natura 2000 and climate change-Polarisation, uncertainty, and pragmatism in discourses on forest conservation and management in Europe", Environ. Sci. Policy, 39, pp.129~138 (2014)
  9. 고재경, "지방공무원들은 기후변화 적응정책의 필요성을 인식하고 있는가?", 도시행정학보, 24(3), pp.51~72 (2011), 한국도시행정학회
  10. 고재경, "지방자치단체 기후변화 적응 거버넌스 변화 연구- 기후변화 적응대책 세부시행계획 수립 단계와 이후를 중심으로 -", 한국기후변화학회지, 8(2), pp.99~108 (2017), 한국기후변화학회[DOI]
  11. Perry J, "Climate change adaptation in the world’s best places : A wicked problem in need of immediate attention", Landscape Urban Plan, 133, pp.1~11 (2015)
  12. Korea Environment Institute, "Manual for local adaptation planning(I)", ~ (2010)
  13. Korea Environment Institute, "Manual for local adaptation planning(II) – ecosystem sector", ~ (2016)
  14. Developing climate change combat capability assessment framework, "Korea Environment Institute", ~ (2016)
  15. Survey on current status of building and using statistics for evidencebased policy, "Korea Institute of Public Administration", ~ (2017)
  16. Webster MS, "Who should pick the winners of climate change?", Cellpress Trends Ecol. Evol, 32, pp.167~173 (2017)
  17. Climate adaptation in Ecosystem sector -Current and future development in adaptation strategy for biodiversity in the advanced countries, "National Institute of Ecology", ~ (2017)
  18. Assessment of climate change and adaptation strategy research for ecosystem in Korea, "National Institute of Ecology", ~ (2018)
  19. Implementation planning for national climate change adaptation (2016~2020), "Government Relevant Ministry", ~ (2018)
  20. 김상수, "기초지자체의 기후변화 전망 및 취약성 평가 결과와 공무원·시민의 인식도 비교분석 연구 - 영월군 사례를 중심으로 -", 한국기후변화학회지, 6(2), pp.133~142 (2015), 한국기후변화학회[DOI]
  21. Hagerman SM, "Entangled judgments: Expert preferences for adapting biodiversity conservation to climate change", Environ. Mgmt, 129, pp.555~563 (2013)
  22. Oh S, "A Study on Vulnerability Assessment and Prioritizing Sectors to Support Adaptation Strategy to Climate Change –Case Study of Gangwon Province –", J Clim. Change Res, 3(4), pp.245~257 (2012)
  23. Booth TH, "Biodiversity and Climate Change Adaptation in Australia: Strategy and Research Developments", Advances in Clim. Change Res, 3(1), pp.12~21 (2012)
  24. 강영은, "기후변화 적응 전략 중요도 분석 및 유형화", 환경정책, 24(1), pp.243~262 (2016), 한국환경정책학회[DOI]
  25. 반영운, "기후변화 적응에 대한 공무원 및 도민의 인식 비교 분석 - 충청북도를 중심으로 -", 지역연구, 33(4), pp.19~28 (2017), 한국지역학회
  26. 정윤지, "일반국민 및 이해관계자의 기후변화 적응 인식 비교 연구", 한국기후변화학회지, 6(2), pp.159~166 (2015), 한국기후변화학회[DOI]
  27. "UNFCCC" (2019)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)