트리즈의 물리적 모순에 대한 모순해결 나비모형의 모순관계와 해결차원 분류
Classification of Contradiction Relations and their Solving Dimensions based on the Butterfly Model for Contradiction Solving for Physical Contradiction of TRIZ
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Creative problem solving has become an important issue in many fields. Among problems, dilemma need creative solutions. New creative and innovative problem solving strategies are required to handle the contradiction relations of the dilemma problems because most creative and innovative cases solved contradictions inherent in the dilemmas. Among various kinds of problem solving theories, TRIZ provides the concept of physical contradiction as a common problem solving principle in inventions and patents. In TRIZ, 4 separation principles solve the physical contradictions of given problems. The 4 separation principles are separation in time, separation in space, separation within a whole and its parts, and separation upon conditions. Despite this attention, an accurate definitions of the separation principles of TRIZ is missing from the literature. Thus, there have been several different interpretations about the separation principles of TRIZ. The different interpretations make problems more ambiguous to solve when the problem solvers apply the 4 separation principles. This research aims to fill the gap in several ways. First, this paper classify the types of contradiction relations and the contradiction solving dimensions based on the Butterfly model for contradiction solving. Second, this paper compares and analyzes each contradiction relation type with the Butterfly diagram. The contributions of this paper lies in reducing the problem space by recognizing the structures and the types of contradiction problems exactly.
Abstract
Creative problem solving has become an important issue in many fields. Among problems, dilemma need creative solutions. New creative and innovative problem solving strategies are required to handle the contradiction relations of the dilemma problems because most creative and innovative cases solved contradictions inherent in the dilemmas. Among various kinds of problem solving theories, TRIZ provides the concept of physical contradiction as a common problem solving principle in inventions and patents. In TRIZ, 4 separation principles solve the physical contradictions of given problems. The 4 separation principles are separation in time, separation in space, separation within a whole and its parts, and separation upon conditions. Despite this attention, an accurate definitions of the separation principles of TRIZ is missing from the literature. Thus, there have been several different interpretations about the separation principles of TRIZ. The different interpretations make problems more ambiguous to solve when the problem solvers apply the 4 separation principles. This research aims to fill the gap in several ways. First, this paper classify the types of contradiction relations and the contradiction solving dimensions based on the Butterfly model for contradiction solving. Second, this paper compares and analyzes each contradiction relation type with the Butterfly diagram. The contributions of this paper lies in reducing the problem space by recognizing the structures and the types of contradiction problems exactly.
참고문헌 (46)
- 김기영, "창의력 문제해결의 힘" (2008), 위즈덤하우스
- 김상수, "창의적 문제해결과 의사결정" (2011), 청람
- 김영채, "유추적 문제해결의 전이와 개념적이해", 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지, 6, pp.132~163 (1994)
- 김호종, "창의공학설계입문 실용트리즈" (2012), 진샘미디어
- 김효준, "창의성의 또 다른 이름 트리즈" (2009), 인피니티북스
- 다카하시 마코토, "창조력 사전" (2002), 매일경제신문사
- 미치오 카쿠, "미래의 물리학" (2013), 김영사
- 박선순, "아리즈 물안경의 렌즈는Why 있는 것일까?" (2012), GS인터비전
- 송용원, "창의성의 기술" (2014), 써네스트
- 송창용, "패러독스 경영을 위한 TOC와 TRIZ의 활용", 산업경영시스템학회지, 33(2), pp.72~80 (2010), 한국산업경영시스템학회
- 야마다 이쿠오, "TRIZ로 배우는 창의적 설계" (2006), 인터비전
- 오경철, "트리즈 마인드맵" (2012), 성안당
- 이경우, "공학문제 해결입문" (2007), 시그마프레스
- 이경원, "대학의 창의적 설계 교육에 적합한 퀵 트리즈(Quick TRIZ)프로세스와 적용사례들", 한국정밀공학회 2010년도 춘계학술대회논문집, pp.871~872 (2010)
- 이용규, "트리즈 (러시아의 창의적문제해결 이론)의 창의적 지식경영에서의 응용", 지식경영연구, 4(1), pp.81~94 (2003)
- 주진용, "생각의 씨앗" (2012), 과학사랑
- 현정석, "모순해결 나비 모형의 알고리즘과 교육효과", Korea Business Review, 16(3), pp.101~132 (2012), 한국경영학회
- 현정석, "혁신의 열쇠는 모순해결에 있다", 주간 금융경제 동향, 4(22), pp.1~5 (2014), 우리금융경영연구소
- 과학기술혁신의 모순해결을 위한 나비모형의 논리적 증명과 사례 연구, "현정석", 과학기술정책관리연구원, 1~80 (2014)
- 현정석, "분할-결합 원리와 상태모형에 대한 학습이 모순문제 해결과 성장 마인드세트에 미치는 영향", 지식경영연구, 14(4), pp.19~46 (2013), 한국지식경영학회
- 현정석, "모순해결 나비모형에 기반한 모순관계유형과 모순해결차원 분류", 한국지식경영학회 2014년 춘계학술대회 발표논문집, pp.1~12 (2014)
- Altshuller, Genrich, "And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving" (1996), Technical Innovation Center, Inc
- Altshuller, G. Saulovich, "Creativity as an Exact Science: The Theory of the Solution of Inventive Problems" (1984), CRC Press
- Bukhman, Isak, "TRIZ Technology for Innovation" (2012), Cubic Creativity Company
- Duncker, Karl, "On Problem-Solving", Psychological Monographs, 58(5)통권 : 270 (1945)
- Fey, Victor, "Innovation on Demand: New Product Development Using TRIZ" (2005), Cambridge University Press
- Fogler, H. Scott, "Strategies for Creative Problem-Solving" (1994), Prentice Hall
- Gick, Mary L, "Analogical Problem Solving", Cognitive Psychology, 12, pp.306~355 (1980)
- Hyun, J. S, "The Butterfly Model for Supporting Creative Problem Solving", 2012Seventh International Conference on IEEE, pp.28~34 (2012), Information and Creativity Support Systems
- Mankiw, N. Gregory, "Principles of Economics" (2009), Cengage Learning
- Martin, Roger L., "The Opposable Mind: Winning through Integrative Thinking" (2009), Harvard Business Press
- Miron-Spektor, Ella, "Paradoxical Frames and Creative Sparks: Enhancing Individual Creativity through Conflict and Integration", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, pp.229~240 (2011)
- Pedone, Roberto, "The Use of Diagrams in Analogical Problem Solving", Memory &Cognition, 29(2), pp.214~221 (2001)
- Peng, Kaiping, "Culture, Dialectics, and Reasoning about Contradiction", American Psychologist, 54(9), pp.741~754 (1999)
- Philatov, V., "Tools of Classical TRIZ" (1999), Ideation International Inc
- Polya, George, "How to Solve It" (1973), Princeton University Press
- Polya, George, "Mathematical Discovery: On Understanding, Learning, and Teaching Problem Solving" (1981), Wiley
- Rothenberg, Albert, "Psychopathology and Creative Cognition: A Comparison of Hospitalized Patients, Nobel Laureates, and Controls", Archives of General Psychiatry, 40(9), pp.937~942 (1983)
- Savransky, Semyon D., "Engineering of Creativity : Introduction to TRIZ Methodology of Inventive Problem Solving" (2002), CRC Press
- Shafir, Eldar, "Reason-based Choice", Cognition, 49(1-2), pp.11~36 (1993)
- Simonson, Itamar, "Choice in Context : Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion", Journal of Marketing Research, 29, pp.281~295 (1992)
- Smith, Wendy K., "Managing Strategic Contradictions:A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams", Organization Science, 16(5), pp.522~536 (2005)
- Spencer, R . Mason, "Context- dependent Effects on Analogical Transfer", Memory &Cognition, 14(5), pp.442~449 (1986)
- Terninko, John, "Systematic innovation: an introduction to TRIZ (theory of inventive problem solving)" (1998), CRC press
- Treffinger, Donald J., "Creative Problem Solving: An Introduction" (2005), Prufrock Press Inc
- Utterback, James M., "Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation" (1994), Harvard Business School Press