TRIZ의 핵심 발명원리를 이용한 발명적 사고도구의 개선
Improving the Inventive Thinking Tools Using Core Inventive Principles of TRIZ
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: SIT(Systematic Inventive Thinking) has been widely used in recent years. The validity of the five thinking tools of SIT is examined, and how to improve the inventive thinking tools is investigated. Methods: Frequency analysis on the usage of the TRIZ 40 inventive principles was used. Inventive thinking tools are derived by eliminating principles with low frequencies and grouping similar principles together. Results: Segmentation, prior action, combining, extraction, cushion in advance, transformation of properties are most frequently used among the 40 principles of TRIZ. The most frequently used principles and similar principles with them are grouped into new inventive thinking tools. Two of them, division and attribute dependency, belong to the 5 thinking tools of SIT, and the others, proactive measures, combination and reversal, do not. Conclusion: The newly identified inventive thinking tools are division, combination, proactive measures, attribute dependency, and reversal. The new five inventive thinking tools are quite efficient since they can cover more than two thirds of the TRIZ 40 inventive principles.
Abstract
Purpose: SIT(Systematic Inventive Thinking) has been widely used in recent years. The validity of the five thinking tools of SIT is examined, and how to improve the inventive thinking tools is investigated. Methods: Frequency analysis on the usage of the TRIZ 40 inventive principles was used. Inventive thinking tools are derived by eliminating principles with low frequencies and grouping similar principles together. Results: Segmentation, prior action, combining, extraction, cushion in advance, transformation of properties are most frequently used among the 40 principles of TRIZ. The most frequently used principles and similar principles with them are grouped into new inventive thinking tools. Two of them, division and attribute dependency, belong to the 5 thinking tools of SIT, and the others, proactive measures, combination and reversal, do not. Conclusion: The newly identified inventive thinking tools are division, combination, proactive measures, attribute dependency, and reversal. The new five inventive thinking tools are quite efficient since they can cover more than two thirds of the TRIZ 40 inventive principles.
참고문헌 (20)
- Altshuller, Genrich S., "The Innovation Algorithm: TRIZ, Systematic Innovation and Technical Creativity" (2007)
- "Think Inside the Umbrella: The Five Techniques of S.I.T."[URL]
- Boyd, Drew, "Inside the Box: A Proven System of Creativity for Breakthrough Results" (2013), Simon & Schuster
- Domb, Ellen, "40 inventive principles with examples", The TRIZ Journal (1997)
- Goldenberg, Jacob, "Finding Your Innovation Spot", Harvard Business Review, 81, pp.120~129 (2003)
- 허건, "창의적인 식품 개발에 있어서 SIT의 효과성에 관한 연구 - H사의 신제품을 중심으로 -", 품질경영학회지, 44(1), pp.95~108 (2016), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Horowitz, Roni, "From TRIZ to ASIT in 4 Steps", The TRIZ Journal (2001)
- Ilevbare, Imoh M., "A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice", Technovation, 33(2-3), pp.30~37 (2013)[DOI]
- 강익선, "아이디어의 창의성과 고객만족의 측정에 관한 연구", 품질경영학회지, 44(1), pp.139~152 (2016), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 박진영, "신제품 디자인 콘셉트에 내재된 비즈니스창의성코드에 관한 연구 : K-디자인 수상작을 중심으로", 한국창업학회지, 12(3), pp.310~332 (2017), 한국창업학회[DOI]
- 김중현, "트리즈 도구별 활용도 분석: S사의 적용사례를 중심으로", 공학교육연구, 20(4), pp.3~11 (2017), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 김중현, "SIT 사고도구에 내재된 TRIZ 발명원리 분석", 공학교육연구, 20(6), pp.35~42 (2017), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- Park, Young T., "An Extension of Quality Function Deployment", Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, 25(4), pp.27~49 (1997)
- 박영택, "품질경영과 창의혁신", 품질경영학회지, 43(1), pp.1~10 (2015), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Park, Young T., "Park on Creative Ideation" (2016)
- Rantanen, K., "Simplified TRIZ: New Problem-Solving Applications for Engineers and Manufacturing Professionals" (2002), CRC Press
- Stern, Y., "New Thoughts for Food", Food Technology, 61(10), pp.34~40 (2007)
- 여형석, "신제품 콘셉트 발상을 위한 SIT&BCC 활용에 관한 연구", 산업디자인학연구, 11(3), pp.11~22 (2017), 한국인더스트리얼디자인학회[DOI]
- 여형석, "플립드 러닝과 마인드 원더링이 아이디어 창출에 미치는 영향: SIT와 BCC의 활용을 중심으로", 공학교육연구, 20(5), pp.23~33 (2017), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 연주한, "해외 아이디어 상품들의 내재된 발명적 사고원리와 창의성에 관한 연구: 일반기계분야를 중심으로", 한국창업학회지, 12(1), pp.167~192 (2017), 한국창업학회[DOI]