본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

생체권력(Bio-Power)과 1918년 인플루엔자

Bio-power and Control of the 1918 Influenza

김서형
한국아메리카학회 (The American Studies Association Of Korea)|2010.09|미국학 논집 (Journal of American Studies)|제42권 제2호|pp. 75-105

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

자기결정권self-determination rightpublic right1918년 인플루엔자Bio-power통제권력1918 Influenza생체권력Control power공적 권리
주제분류영어와문학

초록

The rapid spread and mortality of the 1918 Influenza in the fall of 1918 forced the United States Public Health Service[USPHS] to take more specific and active strategies to prevent it from spreading further. In this process, the spread and micronization of the control power was remarkable. The ultimate aim of the control power to suppress the 1918 Influenza was to intervene in the conditions of occurrence and spread of the infectious disease. Also, as it expanded the influence to total population, the control power had similar characters with the Bio-power. The control power operated in the private sphere not only the public sphere just as institution or system. And it accompanied more powerful binding force than any other period. As a result, the control power had contradicted private freedom, right and the Constitution and it caused conflicts and troubles during the 1918 Influenza. The conflicts and troubles were visible in two aspects. First, the forceful mask wearing policy caused controversy with self-determination elucidated in the Constitution. Especially, San Francisco took the most powerful force to wear the mask. So during the 1918 Influenza, between the forceful mask wearing and the private right existed considerable gap in San Francisco. In addition, to control the public meeting and close the public place, the control power of the 1918 Influenza brought about arguments. Also, it prohibited Liberty Bonds that wished the victory of the First World War and supported war expense. So, the control power could not avoid lots of blames that it was against the national profit and public right. During the 1918 Influenza, the control power in American society implemented vaccine and mortality statistics to control the infectious disease. Sine the 18th century, the modern Bio-power had been visible as experiencing the 1918 Influenza, and it was necessary of national intervention or interference. As Michel Foucault mentioned, the infectious disease could show the nature of the Bio-power to control and regulate the total population. The 1918 Influenza was the most important opportunity to operate the Bio-power in American society.

Abstract

The rapid spread and mortality of the 1918 Influenza in the fall of 1918 forced the United States Public Health Service[USPHS] to take more specific and active strategies to prevent it from spreading further. In this process, the spread and micronization of the control power was remarkable. The ultimate aim of the control power to suppress the 1918 Influenza was to intervene in the conditions of occurrence and spread of the infectious disease. Also, as it expanded the influence to total population, the control power had similar characters with the Bio-power. The control power operated in the private sphere not only the public sphere just as institution or system. And it accompanied more powerful binding force than any other period. As a result, the control power had contradicted private freedom, right and the Constitution and it caused conflicts and troubles during the 1918 Influenza. The conflicts and troubles were visible in two aspects. First, the forceful mask wearing policy caused controversy with self-determination elucidated in the Constitution. Especially, San Francisco took the most powerful force to wear the mask. So during the 1918 Influenza, between the forceful mask wearing and the private right existed considerable gap in San Francisco. In addition, to control the public meeting and close the public place, the control power of the 1918 Influenza brought about arguments. Also, it prohibited Liberty Bonds that wished the victory of the First World War and supported war expense. So, the control power could not avoid lots of blames that it was against the national profit and public right. During the 1918 Influenza, the control power in American society implemented vaccine and mortality statistics to control the infectious disease. Sine the 18th century, the modern Bio-power had been visible as experiencing the 1918 Influenza, and it was necessary of national intervention or interference. As Michel Foucault mentioned, the infectious disease could show the nature of the Bio-power to control and regulate the total population. The 1918 Influenza was the most important opportunity to operate the Bio-power in American society.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Annual Report of the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service of the United States for the Fiscal Year 1919, "Government Printing Office", Government Printing Office, ~ (1919)
  2. "Daily Pennsylvania", October 4 1918, ~ (1918)
  3. "Denver Post", October 4 1918, ~ (1918)
  4. "Denver Post", October 15 1918., ~ (1918)
  5. "Minneapolis Tribune", October 9 1918., ~ (1918)
  6. "Minneapolis Tribune", November 10 1918, ~ (1918)
  7. "Papers of Mayor James Rolph 2", ~
  8. "Philadelphia Inquirer", September 28 1918, ~ (1918)
  9. "Philadelphia Inquirer", October 8 1918, ~ (1918)
  10. "San Francisco Chronicle", October 15 1918, ~ (1918)
  11. "San Francisco Chronicle", October 22 1918, ~ (1918)
  12. "San Francisco Chronicle", October 26 1918, ~ (1918)
  13. "San Francisco Chronicle", October 28 1918, ~ (1918)
  14. "San Francisco Chronicle", October 30 1918, ~ (1918)
  15. "San Francisco Chronicle", November 2 1918, ~ (1918)
  16. "San Francisco Chronicle", December 5 1918, ~ (1918)
  17. "San Francisco Chronicle", December 9 1918, ~ (1918)
  18. "San Francisco Chronicle", December 12 1918, ~ (1918)
  19. "San Francisco Chronicle", December 13 1918, ~ (1918)
  20. "Washington Post", October 4 1918, ~ (1918)
  21. Barry, John, "The Great Influenza: The Story of Deadliest Pandemic in History" (2005), Penguin Books
  22. Crosby, Alfred W, "America’s Forgotten Pandemic: The Influenza of 1918" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  23. Daniel, Thomas M, "Wade Hampton Frost: Pioneer Epidemiologist 1880-1938: Up to the Mountain" (2004), University of Rochest Press
  24. Foucault, Michel, "사회를 보호해야 한다" (1998), 동문선
  25. Jordan, Edwin O, "Epidemic Influenza: A Survey" (1927), American Medical Association
  26. Morris, Alan, "The Influenza Pandemic of 1918-19 and How It affected the City of Schenectady" (1986), Union College
  27. Nadesan, Majia Holmer, "Governmentality, Biopower, and Everyday Life" (2008), Routledge
  28. Osborn, June E, "History, Science and Politics: Influenza in America, 1918-1976" (1977), Prodist
  29. Philips, Howard, "The Spanish Flu Pandemic of 1918: New Perspectives" (2005), Routledge
  30. 김강운, "헌법상 자기결정권의 의의", 법학연구, (20), pp.161~179 (2005), 한국법학회
  31. 김용우, "나치 집단수용소와 생명정치-프리모 레비와 조르조 아감벤의 논의를 중심으로", 대구사학, 98, pp.283~305 (2010), 대구사학회
  32. 임미원, "탈근대적 생명정치 개념의 기초적 고찰－푸코와 로즈의 생명정치 개념을 중심으로－", 법학논총, 27(1), pp.167~182 (2010), 법학연구소
  33. 조지형, "적법절차의 발전과 대서양 세계의 법문화: 미국헌법 수정조항 제5조를 중심으로", 세계헌법연구, 14(2), pp.283~314 (2008), 세계헌법학회한국학회
  34. 진태원, "생명정치의 탄생- 미셸 푸코와 생체권력의 문제", 문학과 사회, 75 (2006)
  35. Abbott, Charles Cortez, "Wall Street and the Security Markets", Harvard Economic Studies, 59 (1999)
  36. Foucault,Michel, "Right of Death and Power over Life", The History of Sexuality, 1 (1990), Vintage
  37. Garret, Thomas A, "Pandemic Economics: The 1918 Influenza and Its Modern-Day Implications", Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review (2008)
  38. Hatchett, Richard J, "Public Health Interventions and Epidemic Intensity During the 1918 Influenza Pandemic", the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104 (2007)
  39. Higgins,James E, "Keystone of an Epidemic: Pennsylvania’s Urban Experience During the 1918-1920 Influenza Epidemic", 박사, pp.2009
  40. Luckingham, Bradfrod, "To Mask or Not to Mask: A Note on the 1918 Spansih Influenza Epidemic in Tucson", Journal of Arizona History, 25 (1984)
  41. Markel, Howard, "Nonpharmaceutical Interventions Implemented by US Cities During the 1918-1919 Influenza Pandemic", Journal of the American Medical Association, 298 (2007)
  42. Rainbow, Paul, "Biopower Today" (2006), Bio-Societies
  43. Shope, Richard E, "Influenza: History, Epidemiology and Speculation", Public Health Reports, 73 (1958)
  44. Steel, B. J, "La Grippe and World War I: Conflict Participation and Pandemic Confrontation", Global Public Health, 4 (2009)
  45. Svider,Peter F, "Municipal Public Health Failures and Socioeconomic Differentiation during Pandemic Influenza in Philadelphia", 박사, pp.2008

관련 논문AI추천

전염병과 소수집단 배제의 담론: 1918년 인플루엔자를 중심으로김서형대구사학회 · 대구사학2014 · 제115권 코로나19 방역정책의 생명정치이론적 분석한민지법학연구원 · 法學論文集2023 · 제47권 제3호Postcolonial Bio-Power and the Duplicity of Society: South Korea under US Military Occupation, 1945–1948박정미한국학중앙연구원 · Korea Journal2025 · 제65권 제3호황열병의 통제담론과 권력관계: 1793년의 필라델피아김서형대한의사학회 · 의사학2014 · 제23권 제3호The Pandemic of the Spanish Influenza in Colonial Korea임채성한국학중앙연구원 · Korea Journal2011 · 제51권 제4호독일에서의 인구-인종주의 전개와 생명정치― ‘생존공간’과 제국을 향한 꿈 2 ―이진일수선사학회 · 사림2014 · 제50호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

미국의회 소위원회제도의 역사적 변천과 그 정치적 동학임성호pp. 5-42미국 민주주의의 사각지대: 대통령제의 권력분립과 대외정책이옥연pp. 43-74설교, 자서전, 에세이: 미국 개인주의 담론의 기원강우성pp. 107-138『가장 푸른 눈』에 나타난 삶을 향한 죽음의 변주 읽기강정희pp. 139-163『모두 왕의 사람들』에 나타난 미국정신의 이원적 현상김은향pp. 165-191
원문 보기