본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

세계 주요국의 자율주행차 정책 및 기업전략에 관한 통합적 연구

Integrative research on industrial policy and corporate strategy of autonomous car

백서인
한국지식경영학회 (The Knowledge Management Society of Korea)|2017.09|지식경영연구 (Knowledge Management Research)|제18권 제3호|pp. 1-36|DOI 10.15813/kmr.2017.18.3.001

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Knowledge ManagementCorporate StrategyAutonomous CarDriverless carIndustry Policy
주제분류경영학

초록

This study conducted comparative study on autonomous car’s industry policy and corporate strategy of US, China, Germany, Japan and Korea. By analyzing core technologies and industry paradigm shifts of autonomous car industry, I was able to figure out autonomous car has high potential to be dominant transportation in the future and it is important to construct core competency in technology area. The meaningful findings by analyzing various primary and secondary data are as followings: First, in case of US, Google was leading autonomous car industry by developing its own OS and Platform. US government has been actively supporting and interacting with private firms and Universities for stimulating industry/technology convergence and establishing standard. Second, in case of Germany, autonomous car development was leading by several auto makers such as Mercedes, BMW in Hardware and manufacturing area, and German government was focusing on deregulations for private company. Third, in case of Japan which quite similar with German situation, they were both independently developing technology and expanding alliances with MNCs. And Japanese government was supporting triple helix system construction between local companies and universities. Fourth, in case of China, autonomous car industry was leading by IT companies, and various cooperations between IT companies and automakers were established. Chinese government was regulating foreign companies and supporting domestic companies both in market and technologies Last, in Korean case, the active and extensive alliances were lacking in Korean companies while strategic and strong government supports were missing in public sector. For competing with other countries and players, more active collaboration between different countries and strong policy supports are needed in Korean auto industry.

Abstract

This study conducted comparative study on autonomous car’s industry policy and corporate strategy of US, China, Germany, Japan and Korea. By analyzing core technologies and industry paradigm shifts of autonomous car industry, I was able to figure out autonomous car has high potential to be dominant transportation in the future and it is important to construct core competency in technology area. The meaningful findings by analyzing various primary and secondary data are as followings: First, in case of US, Google was leading autonomous car industry by developing its own OS and Platform. US government has been actively supporting and interacting with private firms and Universities for stimulating industry/technology convergence and establishing standard. Second, in case of Germany, autonomous car development was leading by several auto makers such as Mercedes, BMW in Hardware and manufacturing area, and German government was focusing on deregulations for private company. Third, in case of Japan which quite similar with German situation, they were both independently developing technology and expanding alliances with MNCs. And Japanese government was supporting triple helix system construction between local companies and universities. Fourth, in case of China, autonomous car industry was leading by IT companies, and various cooperations between IT companies and automakers were established. Chinese government was regulating foreign companies and supporting domestic companies both in market and technologies Last, in Korean case, the active and extensive alliances were lacking in Korean companies while strategic and strong government supports were missing in public sector. For competing with other countries and players, more active collaboration between different countries and strong policy supports are needed in Korean auto industry.

참고문헌 (83)

  1. 사물인터넷(IoT) 개발과 스마트카톡(Car-Talk) 서비스 구축 및 비즈니스 창출방안, "곽수진", Korea Educational Center for Future Technology, ~ (2016)
  2. 4차산업혁명에 대응한 중장기 종합대책, "관계부처합동", 관계부처합동, ~ (2016)
  3. 관계부처합동, "과학기술과 ICT를 활용한경제 활성화 방안", 과학기술전략회의 (2017)
  4. 권상집, "기업가적 의지, 조직학습, 기술", 시장 변화에 의한 대학발 창업 벤처기업의 기회실현 과정: i-KAIST 탐색적 사례연구, 2013, pp.14(5), 55~80[DOI]
  5. 완전자율주행차, "기석철", ICT Convergence Korea, ~ (2017)
  6. 자율주행차를 위한 카메라 알고리즘과 영상DB 적용기술, "기석철", Korea Educational Center for Future Technology, ~ (2016)
  7. 김경묵, "한국과 일본 자동차 업체의 혁신 성과 공유 방식에 대한 비교 연구", 지식경영연구, 12(4), pp.17~40 (2011), 한국지식경영학회
  8. 자율주행차를 위한 플랫폼 개발과 적용방안, "김문식", Korea Educational Center for Future Technology, ~ (2016)
  9. 중국 스마트 자동차 개발 동향과시사점, "김승민", 산업연구원, ~ (2016)
  10. 김왕동, "미래산업의 기술능력 축적과정에 대한 연구 : 중소 반도체 장비 제조업체에 대한 정성적 접근", 박사, 경영학, pp.2002
  11. 김왕동, "기술능력의 축적과정 및영향요인에 대한 연구: 중소 반도체 장비 제조업체를 중심으로", 지식경영연구, 3(2), pp.49~70 (2002)
  12. 인공지능 기반의 스마트 모빌리티 허브 구축 방안과 기반기술, "문영준", Korea Educational Center for Future Technology, ~ (2016)
  13. 커넥티드 기반의 자율차를 위한 Soc 개발과 적용방안, "민경원", Korea Educational Center for Future Technology, ~ (2016)
  14. 실시간 돌발상황 검지시스템을 활용한 도로 상황정보 수집기술, "박재형", Korea Educational Center for Future Technology, ~ (2016)
  15. 지능형 자율주행차 구현을 위한 시스템 반도체 및 인포테인먼트 개발기술, "박지철", Korea Educational Center for Future Technology, ~ (2016)
  16. 백서인, "추격 및 탈추격형 혁신 전략과 정책에 관한 통합적 연구: 자동차 산업의 기술학습과 비즈니스 모델 및 협력구조를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2017
  17. 백서인, "지속성장을 위한 사회적 책임(CSR)의 전략적 활용: 중국 내 자동차 기업에 대한 탐색적 사례연구", 지식경영연구, 16(3), pp.103~128 (2015), 한국지식경영학회[DOI]
  18. 백서인, "중국 3대 경제권 자동차 산업에 대한 연구: 기술학습, 아키텍처, 클러스터를 중심으로", 지식경영연구, 15(4), pp.147~170 (2014), 한국지식경영학회[DOI]
  19. 백서인, "기업가정신과 업무경력에 관한 탐색적 사례연구: 기업유형별 기회포착, 기회실현, 위기관리 전략", 중소기업연구, 37(2), pp.107~146 (2015), 한국중소기업학회
  20. 백서인, "중국 자동차 산업의 기술혁신, 성장전략 및 산업정책의 시사점", 지식경영연구, 17(2), pp.75~101 (2016), 한국지식경영학회
  21. 무인이동체산업의 국내 역량분석 및 정책방향: 드론 및 자율주행차를 중심으로, "서동혁", 산업연구원, 216~268 (2016)
  22. 자율주행차 특강: 완전자율주행을 위한 기술적, 법적 과제들, "서승우", ICT Convergence Korea, ~ (2017)
  23. 스마트카 보안 솔루션 개발과적용 기술, "심상규", Korea Educational Center for Future Technology, ~ (2016)
  24. 지능형 자율차를 위한 인공지능, 빅데이터의 활용방안, "심규석", Korea Educational Center for Future Technology, ~ (2016)
  25. e-business의 확산과 산업혁신과정의 변화: 자동차산업, "엄미정", 과학기술정책연구원, ~, pp.정책연구, 01-12 (2001)
  26. 열차 무인자율주행, "윤용기", ICT Convergence Korea, ~ (2017)
  27. 이공래, "한국의 국가혁신체제" (1998), 기술정책관리연구소
  28. 융합이 기술혁신 패턴에 미치는 영향과 대응전략：자동차산업과 디스플레이산업을 중심으로, "이광호", 과학기술정책연구원, ~, pp.정책연구, 16-09 (2016)
  29. 자동차산업의 장기발전을 위한기술혁신전략, "이영희", 과학기술정책연구원, ~, pp.정책연구, 95-07 (1994)
  30. 자율차용 무선통신모듈 상용화이슈와 V2X통신 적용사례, "임기택", Korea Educational Center for Future Technology, ~ (2016)
  31. 교통정보기술의 진화: 과거, 현재 그리고 4차 산업혁명, "장기태", ICT Convergence Korea, ~ (2017)
  32. CES 2017, 완전자율주행을 위한도전, "정규민", ICT Convergence Korea, ~ (2017)
  33. IOT, 빅데이터, 자율주행 기술이 가져올 스마트 물류의 현재와 미래, "정태수", ICT Convergence Korea, ~ (2017)
  34. 주요산업의 기술혁신체제: 환경, 생물, 자동차 산업을 중심으로, "정선양", 과학기술정책연구원, ~, pp.정책연구, 00-14 (2001)
  35. AUTOSAR 기반의 전장시스템용 SW플랫폼 기술개발과 적용사례, "채승엽", Korea Educational Center for Future Technology, ~ (2016)
  36. 최병헌, "중국의 자동차 산업구조 변화에 관한 연구", 국제지역연구, 14(3), pp.485~516 (2010), 국제지역연구센터
  37. 최석식, "과학기술정책론" (2011), 시그마프레스
  38. 최원석, "왜 다시 토요타인가" (2016), 더퀘스트
  39. 자율주행을 위한 클라우드 기반의 고정밀 전자지도(맵) 구축방안과 적용기술, "최정단", Korea Educational Center for Future Technology, ~ (2016)
  40. Atkins, E. M., "Autonomy as an enabler of economically-viable, beyondline-of-sight, low-altitude UAS applications with acceptable risk", AUVSI Unmanned Systems (2014)
  41. Cho, D. S., "Latecomer strategies: evidence from the semiconductor industry in Japan and Korea", Organization Science, 9(4), pp.489~505 (1998)
  42. Connor, P., "National innovation, industrial policy and renewable energy technology", Proceedings of the 2003Conference on Government Intervention in Energy Markets, 200 (2004), Oxford University
  43. Dudenhöffer, F., "Wer kriegt die Kurve?: Zeitenwende in der Autoindustrie" (2016), Campus Verlag
  44. Dutton, J. E, "Keeping an eye on the mirror: The role of image and identity in organizational adaptation", Academy of Management Journal, 34, pp.517~554 (1991)
  45. Edmondson, A. C, "Disruptedroutines : Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals", Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, pp.685~716 (2001)
  46. Eisenhardt, K. M, "Building theories from case study research", Academy of Management Review, 14, pp.532~550 (1989)
  47. Eisenhardt, K. M., "Theorey building from cases : Opportunities and Challenges", Academy of Management Journal, 50, pp.25~32 (2007)
  48. Fagnant, D. J., "Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: oppor tunities, barriers and policy recommendations", Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, pp.167~181 (2015)
  49. Fujimoto, T., "The evolution of a manufacturing system at Toyota" (1999), Oxford university press
  50. Architecture-based comparative advantage in Japan and Asia, "Fujimoto, T.", MMRC, 1~8, pp.MMRC Discussion Paper, 94 (2006)
  51. Complexity and control: Comparative study of automobiles and electronic products, "Fujimoto, T", MMRC, 1~33, pp.MMRC Discussion Pape , 352 (2011)
  52. Holt, K., "Market-oriented product innovation at Høyang Polaris and Jøtul", Technovation, 8(4), pp.249~254 (1988)
  53. Johnson, A, "Trans for mation and Development", pp.197~227 (2003), Physica-Verlag HD
  54. Khanna, T., "The paradox of Samsung’s rise", Har vard Business Review, 89(7-8), pp.142~147 (2011)
  55. Kim, L., "Imitation to innovation:The dynamics of Korea’s technological learning" (1997), Harvard Business Press
  56. Kim, L., "Cr isis const r uc t ion and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor", Organization Science, 9(4), pp.506~521 (1998)
  57. Kusunoki, K., "Organizational capabilities in product development of Japanese firms:a conceptual framework and empirical findings", Organization Science, 9(6), pp.699~718 (1998)
  58. Lach, S, "Do R&D subsidies stimulateord isplace private R&D? Evidence from Israel", The Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(4), pp.369~390 (2002)
  59. Levy, S., "Who’s in the Driver’s Seat?", Educational Leadership, 73(3), pp.62~67 (2015)
  60. Lewis, J. I., "Fostering a renewable energy technology industry:An international comparison of wind industry policy support mechanisms", Energy Policy, 35(3), pp.1844~1857 (2007)
  61. Leyden, D. P., "Why are governmental R&D and private R&D complements?", Applied Economics, 23(10), pp.1673~1681 (1991)
  62. Lipson, H., "Driverless: Intelligent Cars and the Road Ahead" (2016), MIT Press
  63. Nam, K. M., "Learning through the international joint venture: lessons from the experience of China’s automotive sector", Industrialand Corporate Change, 20(3), pp.855~907 (2011)
  64. Nam, K. M., "Out of passivity: potential role of OFDI in IFDIbased learning trajectory", Industrialand Corporate Change, 22(3), pp.711~743 (2013)
  65. Nam, K. M, "Compact organizational space and technological catch-up: Comparison of China’s three leading automotive groups", Research Policy, 44(1), pp.258~272 (2015)
  66. Fatal Analysis Reporting System. U.S. Department of Transportation, "National High way Traffic Safety Administration", ~ (2012)
  67. Preliminar y Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles, "National High way Traffic Safety Administration", ~ (2013)
  68. U.S. Department of Transportation Announces Decision to Move Forward with Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Technology for Light Vehicles, "National High way Traffic Safety Administration", ~ (2014)
  69. Managing the firm as information creation process.Working paper, Institute of Business Research, "Nonaka, I.", Hitotsubashi University, ~ (1987)
  70. Nonaka, I., "A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation", Organization Science, 5(1), pp.14~37 (1994)
  71. Meadows, D. L., "Estimate accuracy and project selection models in industrial research", Industrial Management Review, 9(3), pp.105~ (1968)
  72. Meyer, M. H., "New product strategy in small technology-based firms: A pilot study", Management Science, 32(7), pp.806~821 (1986)
  73. Mitchell, C., "Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany", Energy Policy, 34, pp.297~305 (2006)
  74. Competitive strategy:Techniques for analyzing industries and companies, "Porter, M. E.", ~ (1980)
  75. Posth, M., "1,000 days in Shanghai:the story of Volkswagen: the first ChineseGerman car factory" (2008), Wiley
  76. Siggelkow, N., "Why focus? A study of intra-industry focus effects", Journal of Industrial Economics, 12, pp.1~150 (2003)
  77. Wernerfelt, B., "Competitive Strategy Under Uncertainty", Academy of Management Proceedings, (1), pp.42~46 (1984)
  78. Xiao, Y., "Why not greater catch-up by Chinese firms? The impact of IPR, corporate governance and technology intensity on late-comer strategies", Research Policy, 42(3), pp.749~764 (2013)
  79. "中国汽车工业协会" (2016)[URL]
  80. "中國製造2025’" (2016)[URL]
  81. 中华人民共和国國務院, "中国国民经济和社会发展第十一个五年规划纲要", ~ (2011)
  82. 中华人民共和国國務院, "中国国民经济和社会发展第十二个五年规划纲要", ~ (2013)
  83. 中华人民共和国國務院, "中国国民经济和社会发展第十三个五年规划纲要", ~ (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

자율주행차 기술 개발의 국제비교 - 한⋅미⋅중⋅일의 특허 출원을 중심으로 -범효걸, 최의현중국연구센터 · 중국과 중국학2021 · 제42권 자율주행 기술의 현황과 미래 동향 고찰 : 산업계 동향을 중심으로 기술 융합 관점의 접근박성근한국융합학회 · 한국융합학회논문지2018 · 제9권 제1호코비드 이후 정책 불확실성 하의 중국 자율주행차 산업 발전에 대한 연구: 중국 완성차 제조업체의 전략적 제휴를 중심으로이상윤한국비교경제학회 · 비교경제연구2024 · 제31권 제1호선진국 대비 자율주행 기술수준 비교 분석김영율, 김진태, 문동환, 이창훈, 조재호한국ITS학회 · 한국ITS학회 논문지2025 · 제24권 제5호스마트 자동차 기술 선점을 위한 전략문종덕, 조광오에스케이텔레콤 (주) · Telecommunications Review2015 · 제25권 제3호기업들의 완전자율주행 기술 개발 전략: 자체개발과 아웃소싱 전략을 중심으로강동우, 김연배, 이동우한국모빌리티학회 · 모빌리티연구2024 · 제4권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

지식은폐의도와 지식전이의도의 영향요인에 관한 실증분석 -공기업 현장근로자와 사무실근로자의 비교분석-김남열, 김민용, 전현규pp. 37-64빅데이터 환경 형성에 따른 데이터 감시 위협과 온라인 프라이버시 보호 활동의 관계에 대한 연구채상미, 박민정pp. 65-82국내외 지식경영연구의 주제어 프로파일링 및 동시출현분석을 통한 학문정체성에 관한 연구김민용, 윤승정pp. 83-102토픽모델링을 이용한 국가간 행복과 불행 토픽 비교 분석 : 한국, 미국, 영국, 브라질송의령, 이연경, 김희웅, 이소현pp. 103-126나노기술에 대한 소비자 지식 및 수용의도 탐색 연구김남희, 송호준, 이동환, 천성용, 배성훈, 강상규pp. 127-148
원문 보기