본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

직무자율성과 자기효능감이 창의적 행동에 미치는 영향:스마트워크 환경에서 지식공유의 매개효과를 중심으로

Effects of Job Autonomy and Self-Efficacy on Creative Behavior: Focusing on the Mediation Effect of Knowledge Sharing in Smart Work Environment

0

조회

0

다운로드

50

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

In order to solve problems in an uncertain and complicated management environment of the modern world, a creative solution that combines diverse perspectives, knowledge, and effort based on diversity within an organization is required. Smart work environment provides an opportunity to express the potential diversity of an individual, extending the source of ideas to the organization, enhancing communication, and linking and sharing information and knowledge. So, this results in increased creative behavior. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the process of connecting and sharing information and knowledge of organizational members on creative behavior and the effect of smart work environment in the process. The purpose of this study is to identify roles of job autonomy, selfefficacy, knowledge sharing and smart work environment in creative process. For the study, 353 surveys with work use group(156 people) and unused group(197 people). Statistical analysis included validity and reliability analysis, structural model analysis. The results showed that self-efficacy and job autonomy had positive effects on creative behavior and knowledge sharing, and job autonomy had a positive effect on self-efficacy. Knowledge sharing has a positive effect on creative behavior, and mediates the relationship between self-efficacy, job autonomy and creative behavior. Particularly, knowledge sharing has a more positive effect on smart work use group. In case of smart work use group, self-efficacy and job autonomy have a relatively high influence on knowledge sharing rather than direct influence on creative behavior appear. This result implies that the achievements of smart work are revealed in terms of knowledge sharing and creative behavior.

Abstract

In order to solve problems in an uncertain and complicated management environment of the modern world, a creative solution that combines diverse perspectives, knowledge, and effort based on diversity within an organization is required. Smart work environment provides an opportunity to express the potential diversity of an individual, extending the source of ideas to the organization, enhancing communication, and linking and sharing information and knowledge. So, this results in increased creative behavior. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the process of connecting and sharing information and knowledge of organizational members on creative behavior and the effect of smart work environment in the process. The purpose of this study is to identify roles of job autonomy, selfefficacy, knowledge sharing and smart work environment in creative process. For the study, 353 surveys with work use group(156 people) and unused group(197 people). Statistical analysis included validity and reliability analysis, structural model analysis. The results showed that self-efficacy and job autonomy had positive effects on creative behavior and knowledge sharing, and job autonomy had a positive effect on self-efficacy. Knowledge sharing has a positive effect on creative behavior, and mediates the relationship between self-efficacy, job autonomy and creative behavior. Particularly, knowledge sharing has a more positive effect on smart work use group. In case of smart work use group, self-efficacy and job autonomy have a relatively high influence on knowledge sharing rather than direct influence on creative behavior appear. This result implies that the achievements of smart work are revealed in terms of knowledge sharing and creative behavior.

참고문헌 (75)

  1. 고은정, "유연근무제 사용에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구 : 동기 및 개인, 조직, 직무 특성의 조절효과를 중심으로", 경영컨설팅연구, 17(4), pp.87~101 (2017), 한국경영컨설팅학회
  2. 권상집, "서번트 리더십이 조직 구성원의 지식공유와 창의성에 미치는 영향: 정서적 몰입의 매개효과", 지식경영연구, 17(1), pp.89~109 (2016), 한국지식경영학회[DOI]
  3. 김해룡, "직무자율성과 조직구성원 태도간의 관계에 대한 자기효능감의 매개효과에 관한 연구", 조직과 인사관리연구, 30(3), pp.181~215 (2006), 한국인사관리학회
  4. 김현진, "신뢰와 갈등, 그리고 지식공유가 개인창의성에 미치는 영향", 대한경영학회지, 29(5), pp.711~735 (2016), 대한경영학회[DOI]
  5. 노규성, "스마트워크 2.0" (2011), 커뮤니케이션북스
  6. 박준기, "팀 혁신활동을 위한 지식공유 활동 영향요인에 관한 연구", 한국IT서비스학회지, 12(3), pp.253~271 (2013), 한국IT서비스학회[DOI]
  7. 변찬복, "지식공유의 선행요인과 서비스 혁신행동에 관한 연구: 서울시 특1급 호텔을 대상으로", 관광연구저널, 27(4), pp.49~68 (2013), 한국관광연구학회
  8. 설홍수, "조직혁신 과정에서 사회정치적 지원, 조직지원인식, 혁신행동의 관계", 조직과 인사관리연구, 30(3), pp.60~82 (2006), 한국인사관리학회
  9. 신선진, "지식관리시스템에서의 지식공유에 대한 영향요인과 성과 간의 구조적 관계에 관한 연구", 지식경영연구, 9(2), pp.87~107 (2008), 한국지식경영학회[DOI]
  10. 오인수, "직무자율성과 급진적", 점진적 창의성간의 관계:팀 몰입의 조절효과에 관한 다수준 연구, 2016, pp.38(4), 1~25[DOI]
  11. 이국용, "조직 구성원의 지식공유 활동에 영향을 미치는 요인", 경영정보학연구, 12(1), pp.81~105 (2010), 한국경영정보학회
  12. 이재성, "스마트워크 현황과 활성화 방안 연구", 한국지역정보화학회지, 13(4), pp.75~96 (2010), 한국지역정보화학회[DOI]
  13. 이혜정, "스마트워크 정책 프레임워크에 관한 연구", 디지털융복합연구, 10(11), pp.145~164 (2012), 한국디지털정책학회
  14. 정성한, "종업원의 자율성과 관리적 통제", 인사조직연구, 8(2), pp.135~163 (2000)
  15. 정성한, "직무자율성의 구성개념과 측정", 경영연구, 16(4), pp.1~24 (2001)
  16. 2015년 스마트워크 이용현황 실태조사, "한국정보화진흥원", 한국정보화진흥원, ~ (2015)
  17. 허명숙, "역할스트레스와 개인 창의성 간의 관계에 대한 실증연구: 창의적 자아효능감과 자기주도성의 매개역할", 정보시스템연구, 22(2), pp.51~83 (2013), 한국정보시스템학회
  18. Alavi, M., "Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues", MIS Quarterly, 25(1), pp.107~136 (2001)
  19. Amabile, T. M, "The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), pp.357~376 (1983)
  20. Amabile, T. M., "Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity", Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), pp.1154~1184 (1996)
  21. Bandura, A., "Social Learning Theory" (1977), Prentice Hall
  22. Bandura, A., "Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control" (1997), Macmillan
  23. Bandura, A., "Negative Self-efficacy and Goal Effects Revisited", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), pp.87~99 (2003)
  24. Breaugh, J. A, "The Measurement of Work Autonomy", H uman R elations, 38(6), pp.551~570 (1985)
  25. Bu kow it z, W, "At t he Core of a Knowledge Base", Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(3), pp.215~224 (1997)
  26. Chen, S. S., "Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of KMS Quality, KMS Self-efficacy, and Organizational Climate", Knowledge-Based Systems, 31, pp.106~118 (2012)
  27. Chin, W. W, "The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling", Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), pp.295~336 (1998)
  28. Chin, W. W., "A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronicmail Emotion", adoption Study, 2003, pp.14(2), 189~217
  29. Davenport, T. H., "Working Knowledge" (1998), Harvard Business School Press
  30. Deci, E. L., "Self-determination in a Work Organization", Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), pp.580~590 (1989)
  31. Dewett, T, "Employee creativity and the role of risk", European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), pp.257~266 (2004)
  32. Dewett, T., "The Role of Information Technology in the Organization: A Review, Model, and Assessment", Journal of Management, 27(3), pp.313~346 (2001)
  33. Drucker, P. F, "The Coming of the New Organization", Harvard Business Review, pp.3~11 (1988)
  34. Eisenberger, R., "Perceived Organizational Support", Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), pp.500~ (1986)
  35. Falk, R. F., "A Primer for Soft Modeling" (1992), University of Akron Press
  36. Ford, C. M, "A Theory of Individual Creative Action in Multiple Social Domains", Academy of Management Review, 21(4), pp.1112~1142 (1996)
  37. Fornell, C., "Partial Least Squares", Advanced Methods of Marketing Research, 407(3), pp.52~78 (1994)
  38. Fornell, C., "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error", Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp.39~50 (1981)
  39. Galbraith, J. R., "Organizing for the Future: The New Logic for Managing Complex Organizations" (1993), Jossey-Bass Inc Pub
  40. Gist, M. E., "Selfeff icacy: A Theoretical Analysis of its Determinants and Malleability", Academy of Management Review, 17(2), pp.183~211 (1992)
  41. Gottschalk, P, "Strategic Knowledge Networks: The Case of IT Support for Eurojur is Law Firms in Norway", International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 14(1), pp.115~129 (2000)
  42. Grant, R. M, "Toward a Knowledgebased Theory of the Firm", Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), pp.109~122 (1996)
  43. Gupta, A. K., "Knowledge Management’s Social Dimension: Lessons from Nucor Steel", MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(1), pp.71~80 (2000)
  44. Hackman, J. R., "Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), pp.250~279 (1976)
  45. Hargadon, A. B, "Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lessons in Pursuing Continuous Innovation", California Management Review, 40(3), pp.209~227 (1998)
  46. Hargadon, A. B., "When Collections of Creatives become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work", Organization Science, 17(4), pp.484~500 (2006)
  47. Helm, S., "Handbook of Partial Least Squares", pp.515~534 (2010), Springer
  48. Hoyle, R. H., "Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research", pp.195~222 (1999), Sage Publications
  49. Hsu, M. H., "Examining Interpersonal Trust as a Facilitator and Uncertainty as an Inhibitor of Intra-organisational Knowledge Sharing", Information Systems Journal, 24(2), pp.119~142 (2014)
  50. 김상수, "The Role of ICT in Smart-work Continuance", Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 28(1), pp.1~18 (2018), 한국경영정보학회[DOI]
  51. Lee, Y. M., "Korean Adaptation of the General Selfefficacy Scale", ~ (2017)
  52. Lin, H. F, "Knowledge Sharing and Firm Innovation Capability: An Empirical Study", International Journal of Manpower, 28(3), pp.315~332 (2007)
  53. Lin, M. J., "Fostering the Determinants of Knowledge Sharing in Professional Virtual Communities", Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), pp.929~939 (2009)
  54. Loher, B. T., "A Meta-analysis of the Relation of Job Characteristics to Job Satisfaction", Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(2), pp.280~289 (1985)
  55. Morgan, K., "Psychological Developments in High Technology Teaching and Learning Environments", British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), pp.71~79 (2000)
  56. Neter, J., "Applied Linear Statistical Models" (1990), Irwin
  57. Nonaka, I, "A Dynamic Theory of Orga n i zat iona l K nowledge Creat ion", Organization Science, 5(1), pp.14~37 (1994)
  58. Nonaka, I., "SECI, Ba and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation", Long Range Planning, 33(1), pp.5~34 (2000)
  59. O’Driscoll, M. P., "New developments in theoretical and conceptual approaches to job stress", pp.269~316 (2010), Emerald Group Publishing Limited
  60. Oldham, G. R., "Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work", Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), pp.607~634 (1996)
  61. Osterloh, M., "Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms", Organization Science, 11(5), pp.538~550 (2000)
  62. Palvalin, M., "Analysing the Impacts of ICT on Knowledge Work Productivity", Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(4), pp.545~557 (2013)
  63. Papadopoulos, T., "Exploring the Determinants of Knowledge Sharing via Employee Weblogs", International Journal of Information Management, 33(1), pp.133~146 (2013)
  64. Podsakoff, P. M., "Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the literature and Recommended Remedies", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), pp.879~903 (2003)
  65. Salomon, G, "Television is ‘Easy’ and Print is ‘Tough’: The Differential Investment of Mental Effort in Learning as a Function of Perceptions and Attributions", Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), pp.647~658 (1984)
  66. Scott, S. G., "Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace", Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), pp.580~607 (1994)
  67. Sobel, M. E, "Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models", Sociological Methodology, 13, pp.290~312 (1982)
  68. Spender, J. C, "Making Knowledge the Basis of a Dynamic Theory of the Firm", Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), pp.45~62 (1996)
  69. Steinmueller, W. E, "Will New Information and Communication Technologies Improve the ‘Codification’ of Knowledge?", Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), pp.361~376 (2000)
  70. Tierney, P., "Creative Self-efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance", Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), pp.1137~1148 (2002)
  71. Tierney, P., "The Pygmalion Process and Employee Creativity", Journal of Management, 30(3), pp.413~432 (2004)
  72. Van Den Hooff, B., "Knowledge Sharing in Context: The Influence of Organizational Commitment, Communication Climate and CMC Use on Knowledge Sharing", Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), pp.117~130 (2004)
  73. Van Knippenberg, D., "Work Group Diversity and Group Performance: An Integrative Model and Research Agenda", Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), pp.1008~1022 (2004)
  74. Wasko, M. M., "Why Should I S hare? E xamining S ocial C apital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice", MIS Quarterly, 29(1), pp.35~57 (2005)
  75. Zhou, J., "When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice", Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), pp.682~696 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)