본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

경계연결리더십이 조직구성원의 자기효능감, 역할 외 활동, 그리고 흡수역량에 미치는 영향

The Effect of Boundary-spanning Leadership on Self-efficacy, Extra-role Behavior, and Absorptive Capacity

권정언|우형록
한국지식경영학회 (The Knowledge Management Society of Korea)|2019.03|지식경영연구 (Knowledge Management Research)|제20권 제1호|pp. 133-153|DOI 10.15813/kmr.2019.20.1.006

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Self-efficacyAbsorptive capacityBoundary-spanning leadershipExtra-role behavior
주제분류경영학

초록

Due to the uncertainty of dynamic business environment, modern organizations have been giving attention to dynamic capabilities beyond traditional notion of core competence. Among them, absorptive capacity and boundary-spanning activity are considered the most important. The former refers to activities regarding acquisition, assimilation, transformation and exploitation of internal and external knowledge. The latter is composed of boundary-loosening and boundary-tightening activities to detect internal or external information and then to preserve, protect, or acquire resources. Thus, both have achieved wide recognition as a potential source of change and innovation. This study investigated the cross-level relation between boundary-spanning leadership at team level and absorptive capacity at individual level. We also explored self-efficacy and extra-role behavior that can affect employees’ absorptive capacity. To test multi-level analysis, the survey data were collected from 862 members in 137 teams of different firms. Results revealed that boundary-spanning leadership had the positive cross-level impact on absorptive capacity in the team context. Moreover, absorptive capacity was positively associated with self-efficacy and extra-role behavior at individual level. Based on these findings, we provided theoretical and practical implications to address rapidly changing environments and discussed limitations of this paper for further research.

Abstract

Due to the uncertainty of dynamic business environment, modern organizations have been giving attention to dynamic capabilities beyond traditional notion of core competence. Among them, absorptive capacity and boundary-spanning activity are considered the most important. The former refers to activities regarding acquisition, assimilation, transformation and exploitation of internal and external knowledge. The latter is composed of boundary-loosening and boundary-tightening activities to detect internal or external information and then to preserve, protect, or acquire resources. Thus, both have achieved wide recognition as a potential source of change and innovation. This study investigated the cross-level relation between boundary-spanning leadership at team level and absorptive capacity at individual level. We also explored self-efficacy and extra-role behavior that can affect employees’ absorptive capacity. To test multi-level analysis, the survey data were collected from 862 members in 137 teams of different firms. Results revealed that boundary-spanning leadership had the positive cross-level impact on absorptive capacity in the team context. Moreover, absorptive capacity was positively associated with self-efficacy and extra-role behavior at individual level. Based on these findings, we provided theoretical and practical implications to address rapidly changing environments and discussed limitations of this paper for further research.

참고문헌 (96)

  1. 고은정, "직무자율성과 자기효능감이 창의적 행동에 미치는 영향:스마트워크 환경에서 지식공유의 매개효과를 중심으로", 지식경영연구, 19(2), pp.163~186 (2018), 한국지식경영학회[DOI]
  2. 구철모, "조직의 흡수역량이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증연구", 경영학연구, 37(3), pp.515~536 (2008), 한국경영학회
  3. 권정언, "완충조직의 경계관리와 성공요인에 관한 연구", 기업경영연구, 23(3), pp.57~76 (2016), 한국기업경영학회
  4. 김명후, "이슈리더십이 구성원의 경쟁적 협력에 미치는영향: 흡수역량의 매개효과와 진성리더십의매개된 조절효과를 중심으로", 리더십연구, 9(2), pp.125~155 (2018), 리더십학회
  5. 김병근, "한국 중소기업의 협력역량, 흡수역량과 협력성과", 연세경영연구, 54(3), pp.51~76 (2017), 경영연구소
  6. 김선왕, "개인의 기업가정신과 조직몰입의 관계에서 대내·외 네트워크와 창의적 효능감의 매개효과에 관한 연구", 경영과 정보연구, 36(5), pp.121~149 (2017), 대한경영정보학회[DOI]
  7. 김수연, "서비스보증정책과 서비스 종업원의 직무수행의지: 종업원의 자기효능감과 책임감의 영향을 중심으로", 연세경영연구, 49(2), pp.169~186 (2012), 경영연구소
  8. 송인숙, "교육훈련, 서번트 리더십, 자기효능감, 교육훈련 전이, 지식공유 간의 구조적 관계 분석", 지식경영연구, 18(4), pp.261~286 (2017), 한국지식경영학회[DOI]
  9. 이동윤, "지식자기효능감이 종업원의 지식공유의도에 미치는 영향: 개인성과기대 및 과업성과기대의 매개효과 검증", 지식경영연구, 19(3), pp.31~46 (2018), 한국지식경영학회[DOI]
  10. 이원준, "공급 사슬 참여 기업간 기존 거래 관계와 IT 기반 협업 활동이공급 사슬 성과에 미치는 영향: 흡수 역량을 중심으로", 지식경영연구, 19(4), pp.77~98 (2018), 한국지식경영학회[DOI]
  11. 장재승, "개인의 흡수 역량이 프로세스 및 제품 혁신에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구", 지식경영연구, 17(1), pp.133~152 (2016), 한국지식경영학회[DOI]
  12. 주영주, "기업 사이버교육생의 학업적 자기효능감, 자기조절학습능력, 온라인과제가치가 학업성취도와 학습전이에 미치는 영향", 지식경영연구, 9(4), pp.1~16 (2008), 한국지식경영학회[DOI]
  13. 채성욱, "소셜네트워크서비스에서 집합적 효능감이이용자들의 자기노출에 미치는 영향", 지식경영연구, 19(1), pp.19~39 (2018), 한국지식경영학회[DOI]
  14. Aldrich, H., "Boundary spanning roles and organizational structure", Academy of Management Review, 2(2), pp.217~230 (1977)
  15. Ancona, D. G., "Beyond task and maintenance: Defining external functions in groups", Group & Organization Studies, 13(4), pp.468~494 (1988)
  16. Ancona, D. G., "Beyond boundary spanning: Managing external dependence in product development teams", Journal of High Technology Management Research, 1(2), pp.119~135 (1990)
  17. Ancona, D. G., "Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams", Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), pp.634~665 (1992)
  18. Ancona, D. G., "Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance", Organization Science, 3(3), pp.321~341 (1992)
  19. Ancona, D. G., "Improving the performance of new product teams", Research-Technology Management, 50(5), pp.37~43 (2007)
  20. Armstrong, J. S., "Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys", Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), pp.396~402 (1977)
  21. Bagozzi, R. P., "On the evaluation of structural equation models", Journal of the Academy Marketing Science, 16(10), pp.74~94 (1988)
  22. Bandura, A., "Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change", Psychological Review, 84(2), pp.191~215 (1977)
  23. Bandura, A., "Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency", American Psychologist, 37(2), pp.122~147 (1982)
  24. Bandura, A., "Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning", Educational Psychologist, 28(2), pp.117~148 (1993)
  25. Becker, W. J., "Emotional labor within teams: Outcomes of individual and peer emotional labor on perceived team support, extra-role behaviors, and turnover intentions", Group & Organization Management, 43(1), pp.38~71 (2018)
  26. Benoliel, P., "The role of leader boundary activities in enhancing interdisciplinary team effectiveness", Small Group Research, 46(1), pp.83~124 (2015)
  27. Bliese, P. D., "Group size and measures of group-level properties: An examination of eta-squared and ICC values", Journal of Management, 24, pp.157~172 (1998)
  28. Bolino, M. C., "The impact of impression‐management tactics on supervisor ratings of organizational citizenship behavior", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), pp.281~297 (2006)
  29. Brender-Ilan, Y., "How do self-efficacy, narcissism and autonomy mediate the link between destructive leadership and counterproductive work behaviour", Asia Pacific Management Review, 23(4), pp.1~11 (2018)
  30. Brion, S., "Project leaders as boundary spanners: Relational antecedents and performance outcomes", International Journal of Project Management, 30(6), pp.708~722 (2012)
  31. Chen, G., "Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale", Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), pp.62~83 (2001)
  32. Chen, X., "Revisiting the relationship between justice and extra-role behavior: The role of state ownership", Management and Organization Review, 14(3), pp.607~639 (2018)
  33. Chiu, S. F., "The linkage between profit sharing and organizational citizenship behavior", International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(6), pp.1098~1115 (2007)
  34. Chomeya, R., "Quality of psychology test between Likert scale 5 and 6 points", Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), pp.399~403 (2010)
  35. Cohen, W. M., "Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), pp.128~ (1990)
  36. Cross, R., "Investing in boundary-spanning collaboration to drive efficiency and innovation", Organizational Dynamics, 44(3), pp.204~216 (2015)
  37. Cross, R., "A bridge too far? How boundary spanning networks drive organizational change and effectiveness", Organizational Dynamics, 42(2), pp.81~91 (2013)
  38. Da Silva, N., "Absorptive capacity at the individual level: Linking creativity to innovation in academia", Review of Higher Education, 34(3), pp.355~379 (2011)
  39. Tamer K. Darwish, "Organizational Learning of Absorptive Capacity and Innovation: Does Leadership Matter?", European Management Review (2018), Wiley[DOI]
  40. Decuyper, S., "Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations", Educational Research Review, 5(2), pp.111~333 (2010)
  41. Drach-Zahavy, A., "Interorganizational teams as boundary spanners: The role of team diversity, boundedness, and extrateam links", European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), pp.89~118 (2011)
  42. Edú-Valsania, S., "Authentic leadership and employee knowledge sharing behavior: Mediation of the innovation climate and workgroup identification", Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 37(4), pp.487~506 (2016)
  43. Eisenberger, R., "Perceived organizational support", Journal of Applied psychology, 71(3), pp.500~507 (1986)
  44. Ernst, C., "Flat world, hard boundaries: How to lead across them", MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(3), pp.81~88 (2011)
  45. Ferreras Méndez, J. L., "Transformational leadership and absorptive capacity: An analysis of the organisational catalysts for this relationship", Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 30(2), pp.211~226 (2018)
  46. Flatten, T. C., "A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation", European Management Journal, 29(2), pp.98~116 (2011)
  47. Fleming, L., "Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities", Organization Science, 18(2), pp.165~180 (2007)
  48. Fornell, C., "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error", Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp.39~50 (1981)
  49. George, J. M., "Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship", Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), pp.310~329 (1992)
  50. Gist, M. E., "Selfefficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability", Academy of Management Review, 17(2), pp.183~211 (1992)
  51. Gladstein, D. L., "Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness", Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), pp.499~517 (1984)
  52. Harman, H. H., "Modern factor analysis" (1967), University of Chicago
  53. Jean-Francois Harvey, "Leadership Practices for Teaming Across Boundaries", Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016(1), pp.17712~ (2016), Academy of Management[DOI]
  54. Hirst, G., "A model of R&D leadership and team communication: The relationship with project performance", R&D Management, 34(2), pp.147~160 (2004)
  55. Hitt, M. A., "Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management", Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), pp.1385~1399 (2007)
  56. Huber, G., "The essentials of knowledge management", pp.199~212 (2015), Palgrave Macmillan
  57. Jansen, J. J. P., "Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter?", Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), pp.999~1015 (2005)
  58. Johnson, K. L., "The view from the field: A case study of the expatriate boundary-spanning role", Journal of World Business, 45(1), pp.29~40 (2010)
  59. Kahn, W. A., "Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work", Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), pp.692~724 (1990)
  60. Katz, D., "The motivational basis of organizational behavior", Behavioral Science, 9(2), pp.131~146 (1964)
  61. Korschun, D., "Boundary-spanning employees and relationships with external stakeholders: A social identity approach", Academy of Management Review, 40(4), pp.611~629 (2015)
  62. Lane, P. J., "The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct", Academy of Management Review, 31(4), pp.833~863 (2006)
  63. Lichtenthaler, U., "Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning process", Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), pp.822~846 (2009)
  64. Likert, R., "The human organization: Its management and value" (1967), McGraw-Hill
  65. Limaj, E., "The roles of absorptive capacity and cultural balance for exploratory and exploitative innovation in SMEs", Journal of Business Research, 94, pp.137~153 (2019)
  66. MacKenzie, S. B., "The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on evaluations of salesperson performance", Journal of Marketing, 57(1), pp.70~80 (1993)
  67. Marrone, J. A., "Team boundary spanning: A multilevel review of past research and proposals for the future", Journal of Management, 36(4), pp.911~940 (2010)
  68. Marrone, J. A., "A multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of team member boundary-spanning behavior", Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), pp.1423~1439 (2007)
  69. Naqshbandi, M. M., "The interplay of leadership, absorptive capacity, and organizational learning culture in open innovation: Testing a moderated mediation model", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133, pp.156~167 (2018)
  70. Organ, D. W., "Linking pins between organizations and environment: Individuals do the interacting", Business Horizons, 14(6), pp.73~80 (1971)
  71. Palus, C. J., "Boundary-spanning in organizations: Network, influence, and conflict", pp.206~229 (2014), Routledge
  72. Podsakoff, P. M., "Selfreports in organization research: Problems and prospects", Journal of Management, 12(4), pp.531~544 (1986)
  73. Prochazka, J., "The relationship between transformational leadership and engagement: Self-efficacy as a mediator", Journal of Leadership Studies, 11(2), pp.22~33 (2017)
  74. Putrawan, I. M., "Leadership and selfefficacy: Its effect on employees motivation", Advanced Science Letters, 23(1), pp.173~176 (2017)
  75. Rai, R., "How do servant leaders ignite absorptive capacity? The role of epistemic motivation and organizational support", Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 32(2), pp.123~134 (2016)
  76. Ramarajan, L., "From the outside in: The negative spillover effects of boundary spanners’ relations with members of other organizations", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(6), pp.886~905 (2011)
  77. Rhoades, L., "Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature", Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), pp.698~714 (2002)
  78. Royle, M. T., "The interactive effects of accountability and job self-eff icacy on organizational citizenship behavior and political behavior", Organizational Analysis, 13(1), pp.53~71 (2005)
  79. Salem, M., "How field office leaders drive learning and creativity in humanitarian aid: Exploring the role of boundary-spanning leadership for expatriate and local aid worker collaboration", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(5), pp.594~611 (2018)
  80. Shah, N. P., "Secondhand social capital: Boundary spanning, secondhand closure, and individual performance", Social Networks, 52, pp.18~27 (2018)
  81. Somech, A., "Understanding extra-role behavior in schools: The relationships between job satisfaction, sense of efficacy, and teachers’ extra-role behavior", Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5-6), pp.649~659 (2000)
  82. Somech, A., "Team boundary activity: Its mediating role in the relationship between structural conditions and team innovation", Group & Organization Management, 39(3), pp.274~299 (2014)
  83. Sun, P. Y. T., "The combined influence of top and middle management leadership styles on absorptive capacity", Management Learning, 43(1), pp.25~51 (2012)
  84. Takanashi, C., "Boundary spanning leadership, resource mobilisation, and performance of university-industry R&D projects: A study in a Japanese university", Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 31(2), pp.140~154 (2019)
  85. Teece, D., "Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy", California Management Review, 58(4), pp.13~35 (2016)
  86. Tremblay, M., "Good things are not eternal: How consideration leadership and initiating structure influence the dynamic nature of organizational justice and extrarole behaviors at the collective level", Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 25(2), pp.211~232 (2018)
  87. van Meerkerk, I., "Critical reflections on interactive governance: Self-organization and participation in public governance", pp.467~490 (2016), Edward Elgar Publishing
  88. Wales, W. J., "Too much of a good thing? Absorptive capacity, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation", Strategic Management Journal, 34, pp.622~633 (2013)
  89. Wang, L., "How do incentives motivate absorptive capacity development? The mediating role of employee learning and relational contingencies", Journal of Business Research, 85, pp.226~237 (2018)
  90. Williams, L. J., "Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors", Journal of Management, 17(3), pp.601~617 (1991)
  91. Winter, S., "Reproducing knowledge: Inaccurate replication and failure in franchise organizations", Organization Science, 23(3), pp.672~685 (2012)
  92. Xie, X., "Knowledge absorptive capacity and innovation performance in high-tech companies: A multimediating analysis", Journal of Business Research, 88, pp.289~297 (2018)
  93. Yang, J., "A multi-level study of servant leadership on creativity: The roles of self-efficacy and power distance", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(5), pp.610~629 (2017)
  94. Yaseen, S. G., "Leadership styles, absorptive capacity and firm’s innovation", International Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(3), pp.82~100 (2018)
  95. Yukl, G., "Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research", Journal of Management, 15(2), pp.251~289 (1989)
  96. Zahra, S. A., "Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension", Academy of Management Review, 27(2), pp.185~203 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

상사의 변화지향 리더십이 조직구성원의 적응수행에 미치는 영향 : 영역초월행동의 매개효과를 중심으로박덕현, 조태준한국인력개발학회 · HRD연구2020 · 제22권 제1호연구개발팀에서 팀 효능감과 팀 혁신성과간의 관계에서 팀 학습행동의 매개역할김학수, 이준호한국지식경영학회 · 지식경영연구2012 · 제13권 제3호팀 학습행동이 팀 효과성에 미치는 영향과 팀 동적역량의 매개효과이균재, 홍아정한국지식경영학회 · 지식경영연구2014 · 제15권 제4호임파워링 리더십과 혁신 행위 간에 미치는 자기효능감의 매개효과권상집, 권정언한국기업교육학회 · 기업교육과인재연구2015 · 제17권 제1호중국 기업 구성원의 영역초월행동이 직무성과에 미치는 영향 - 흡수역량의 매개효과와 가치관의 조절효과를 중심으로임설교, 정수진한국상업경영학회 · 상업경영연구2020 · 제34권 제5호팀장 변혁적 리더십이 개인효과성에 미치는 영향에 관한 다수준 분석: 자기 및 집단효능감의 매개효과를 중심으로윤필현한국농·산업교육학회 · 농업교육과 인적자원개발2013 · 제45권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

R을 이용한 구조방정식모델링: 분석절차 및 방법곽기영pp. 1-26ICT 산업의 R&D 투자가 타 산업에 미치는 파급효과 측정정우진, 조신, 김현석pp. 27-43텍스트마이닝을 이용한 미용성형 주요 요인에 관한 연구이소현, 김희웅, 손새아pp. 45-75융합지향 조직 구축을 위한 융합인재 측정 도구 개발권상집, 이서영pp. 77-99The Effects of Integrated Destination Personality, Selfcongruity, Product Involvement in Smart Tourism City이선영, 구철모, 양시진pp. 101-132
원문 보기