도시기본계획의 탄소중립 전략 평가 연구: 평가지표 개발 및 적용을 중심으로
Development and Application of Carbon Neutrality Strategy Evaluation Indicators in Urban Master Plans: A Case Study of 12 Cities in Gyeonggi-do
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
도시는기후변화대응에서핵심적역할을수행한다. 도시기본계획은하위계획수립의방향을제시하므로효과적인저탄소정책실행을위해서는도시기본계획에탄소중립전략을명확히반영해야한다. 따라서본연구는도시기본계획에서탄소중립전략을효과적으로평가하기위한지표를개발하고경기도12개도시를대상으로평가하였다. 이를위해계층적의사결정방법을활용하여평가지표간가중치를산정하였다. 도시기본계획평가결과, 의정부, 오산, 양주등은에너지보존·효율성목표수립, 산업기술및생산시스템개선, 기후취약계층지원계획을구체적으로마련해높은점수를받았다. 반면, 화성, 구리, 파주시는에너지보존·효율성목표설정, 산업기술개선, 지역신재생에너지개발계획등이미흡해낮은평가를받았다. 지표간에서는‘탄소배출현황및원인’지표는높은가중치와체계적자료구축으로우수한평가를받았으나, 타기관협력과취약계층지원지표는구체적실행계획이부족하여상대적으로낮은평가를받았다. 본연구는도시기본계획의명확한지표설정과핵심지침의의무화를통해도시기본계획이정부의탄소중립목표를효과적으로달성하는데기여하고자한다.
Abstract
Cities play a critical role in addressing climate change, and urban master plans, as guidingframeworks for subordinate plans, must effectively incorporate carbon neutrality strategies. This studydeveloped evaluation indicators for assessing such strategies in urban master plans and applied themto domestic cities, employing a hierarchical decision-making approach to determine indicator weights. Results show that cities such as Uijeongbu, Osan, and Yangju scored highly by establishing detailed energy conservation and efficiency targets, improving industrial technology and production systems,and formulating support plans for vulnerable populations. In contrast, Hwaseong, Guri, and Pajuscored lower due to insufficient energy targets, industrial technology improvements, and localrenewable energy development plans. While the “Greenhouse Gas Emission Status and Causes”indicator received high marks for its robust weighting and systematic data collection, indicators forinter-agency cooperation and vulnerable group support were notably underdeveloped. This studysuggests that clarifying urban master plan formulation guidelines and mandating key directives cansignificantly enhance their contribution to achieving the government’s carbon neutrality goals.