Sensitivity and Usefulness of VE1 Immunohistochemical Staining in Acral Melanomas with BRAF Mutation
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Acral melanomas are known to have a low frequency of BRAF mutation, in contrary to higher KIT mutation. Recently, VE1 immunostaining was reported to have a good correlation with BRAF mutation status. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological features of BRAF-mutated acral melanomas and validate the correlation of the VE1 immunohistochemical stains in those cases. Methods: The clinical features (age, sex, anatomical site), and histopathological characteristics of 41 patients with acral melanoma were evaluated. We performed a next-generation sequencing to detect BRAF mutation status. We also determined the correlation of VE1 immunohistochemical staining with BRAF mutation status. Results: Among 19 acral melanomas with BRAF mutation, common histopathological subtype was acral lentiginous melanoma (8/19, 42%) and nodular melanoma (8/19, 42%) and superficial spreading melanoma (3/19, 16%) followed. VE1 immunostaining results were positive in all 15 cases with BRAF V600E mutation (sensitivity 100%), and negative in 4 cases of BRAF non-V600E mutation. However, VE1 immunostaining was negative in all 22 patients with BRAF wild-type. Conclusion: VE1 immunostaining had a good correlation with BRAF V600E mutation status.
Abstract
Background: Acral melanomas are known to have a low frequency of BRAF mutation, in contrary to higher KIT mutation. Recently, VE1 immunostaining was reported to have a good correlation with BRAF mutation status. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological features of BRAF-mutated acral melanomas and validate the correlation of the VE1 immunohistochemical stains in those cases. Methods: The clinical features (age, sex, anatomical site), and histopathological characteristics of 41 patients with acral melanoma were evaluated. We performed a next-generation sequencing to detect BRAF mutation status. We also determined the correlation of VE1 immunohistochemical staining with BRAF mutation status. Results: Among 19 acral melanomas with BRAF mutation, common histopathological subtype was acral lentiginous melanoma (8/19, 42%) and nodular melanoma (8/19, 42%) and superficial spreading melanoma (3/19, 16%) followed. VE1 immunostaining results were positive in all 15 cases with BRAF V600E mutation (sensitivity 100%), and negative in 4 cases of BRAF non-V600E mutation. However, VE1 immunostaining was negative in all 22 patients with BRAF wild-type. Conclusion: VE1 immunostaining had a good correlation with BRAF V600E mutation status.
참고문헌 (29)
- 김상엽, "Cutaneous Melanoma in Asians", 전남의대학술지, 52(3), pp.185~193 (2016), 의과학연구소
- [URL]
- Wilson MA, "Molecular testing in melanoma", Cancer J, 18, pp.117~123 (2012)[DOI]
- [URL]
- Davies H, "Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer", Nature, 417, pp.949~954 (2002)[DOI]
- Rubinstein JC, "Incidence of the V600K mutation among melanoma patients with BRAF mutations, and potential therapeutic response to the specific BRAF inhibitor PLX4032", J Transl Med, 8, pp.67~ (2010)[DOI]
- Edlundh-Rose E, "NRAS and BRAF mutations in melanoma tumours in relation to clinical characteristics: a study based on mutation screening by pyrosequencing", Melanoma Res, 16, pp.471~478 (2006)[DOI]
- Saldanha G, "Cutaneous melanoma subtypes show different BRAF and NRAS mutation frequencies", Clin Cancer Res, 12, pp.4499~4505 (2006)[DOI]
- Lang J, "Prevalence of exon 15 BRAF mutations in primary melanoma of the superficial spreading, nodular, acral, and lentigo maligna subtypes", J Invest Dermatol, 125, pp.575~579 (2005)[DOI]
- Jin SA, "BRAF mutations and KIT aberrations and their clinicopathological correlation in 202 Korean melanomas", J Invest Dermatol, 133, pp.579~582 (2013)[DOI]
- 홍진우, "Prognostic and Clinicopathologic Associations of BRAF Mutation in Primary Acral Lentiginous Melanoma in Korean Patients: A Preliminary Study", Annals of Dermatology, 26(2), pp.195~202 (2014), 대한피부과학회
- Pearlstein MV, "Validation of the VE1 immunostain for the BRAF V600E mutation in melanoma", J Cutan Pathol, 41, pp.724~732 (2014)[DOI]
- Marin C, "Detection of BRAF p.V600E mutations in melanoma by immunohistochemistry has a good interobserver reproducibility", Arch Pathol Lab Med, 138, pp.71~75 (2014)[DOI]
- Capper D, "Assessment of BRAF V600E mutation status by immunohistochemistry with a mutation-specific monoclonal antibody", Acta Neuropathol, 122, pp.11~19 (2011)[DOI]
- Long GV, "Immunohistochemistry is highly sensitive and specific for the detection of V600E BRAF mutation in melanoma", Am J Surg Pathol, 37, pp.61~65 (2013)[DOI]
- Manfredi L, "Highly concordant results between immunohistochemistry and molecular testing of mutated V600E BRAF in primary and metastatic melanoma", Acta Derm Venereol, 96, pp.630~634 (2016)[DOI]
- Capper D, "Immunohistochemical testing of BRAF V600E status in 1,120 tumor tissue samples of patients with brain metastases", Acta Neuropathol, 123, pp.223~233 (2012)[DOI]
- Yaman B, "BRAF-V600 Mutation heterogeneity in primary and metastatic melanoma: a study with pyrosequencing and immunohistochemistry", Am J Dermatopathol, 38, pp.113~120 (2016)[DOI]
- Li H, "Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform", Bioinformatics, 25, pp.1754~1760 (2009)[DOI]
- DePristo MA, "A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data", Nat Genet, 43, pp.491~498 (2010)
- Van der Auwera GA, "From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the genome analysis toolkit best practices pipeline", Curr Protoc Bioinformatics, 43, pp.11~ (2013)
- Wilm A, "LoFreq: a sequence-quality aware, ultra-sensitive variant caller for uncovering cell-population heterogeneity from high-throughput sequencing datasets", Nucleic Acids Res, 40, pp.11189~11201 (2012)[DOI]
- Wei Z, "SNVer: a statistical tool for variant calling in analysis of pooled or individual next-generation sequencing data", Nucleic Acids Res, 39, pp.e132~ (2011)[DOI]
- Hayward NK, "Whole-genome landscapes of major melanoma subtypes", Nature, 11(545), pp.175~180 (2017)
- Wu X, "Mutations in BRAF codons 594 and 596 predict good prognosis in melanoma", Oncol Lett, 14, pp.3601~3605 (2017)[DOI]
- Boursault L, "Tumor homogeneity between primary and metastatic sites for BRAF status in metastatic melanoma determined by immunohistochemical and molecular testing", PLoS One, 8, pp.e70826~ (2013)[DOI]
- Rapisuwon S, "Discordance between cobas BRAF V600 testing and VE1 immunohistochemistry in a melanoma patient with bone marrow metastases", Am J Dermatopathol, 38, pp.687~689 (2016)[DOI]
- Heinzerling L, "Rare BRAF mutations in melanoma patients: implications for molecular testing in clinical practice", Br J Cancer, 108, pp.2164~2171 (2013)[DOI]
- Ihle MA, "Comparison of high resolution melting analysis, pyrosequencing, next generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry to conventional Sanger sequencing for the detection of p.V600E and non-p.V600E BRAF mutations", BMC Cancer, 14, pp.13~ (2014)[DOI]
