Utility of BRAF VE1 Immunohistochemistry as a Screening Tool for Colorectal Cancer Harboring BRAF V600E Mutation
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: BRAF mutation has been recognized as an important biomarker of colorectal cancer (CRC) for targeted therapy and prognosis prediction. However, sequencing for every CRC case is not cost-effective. An antibody specific for BRAF V600E mutant protein has been introduced, and we thus examined the utility of BRAF VE1 immunohistochemistry for evaluating BRAF mutations in CRC. Methods: Fifty-one BRAF-mutated CRCs and 100 age and sexmatched BRAF wild-type CRCs between 2005 and 2015 were selected from the archives of Asan Medical Center. Tissue microarrays were constructed and stained with BRAF VE1 antibody. Results: Forty-nine of the 51 BRAF-mutant CRCs (96.1%) showed more than moderate cytoplasmic staining, except for two weakly stained cases. Six of 100 BRAF wild-type cases also stained positive with BRAF VE1 antibody; four stained weakly and two stained moderately. Normal colonic crypts showed nonspecific weak staining, and a few CRC cases exhibited moderate nuclear reactivity (3 BRAF-mutant and 10 BRAF wild-type cases). BRAF-mutated CRC patients had higher pathologic stages and worse survival than BRAF wild-type patients. Conclusions: BRAF VE1 immunohistochemistry showed high sensitivity and specificity, but occasional nonspecific staining in tumor cell nuclei and normal colonic crypts may limit their routine clinical use. Thus, BRAF VE1 immunohistochemistry may be a useful screening tool for BRAF V600E mutation in CRCs, provided that additional sequencing studies can be done to confirm the mutation in BRAF VE1 antibody-positive cases.
Abstract
Background: BRAF mutation has been recognized as an important biomarker of colorectal cancer (CRC) for targeted therapy and prognosis prediction. However, sequencing for every CRC case is not cost-effective. An antibody specific for BRAF V600E mutant protein has been introduced, and we thus examined the utility of BRAF VE1 immunohistochemistry for evaluating BRAF mutations in CRC. Methods: Fifty-one BRAF-mutated CRCs and 100 age and sexmatched BRAF wild-type CRCs between 2005 and 2015 were selected from the archives of Asan Medical Center. Tissue microarrays were constructed and stained with BRAF VE1 antibody. Results: Forty-nine of the 51 BRAF-mutant CRCs (96.1%) showed more than moderate cytoplasmic staining, except for two weakly stained cases. Six of 100 BRAF wild-type cases also stained positive with BRAF VE1 antibody; four stained weakly and two stained moderately. Normal colonic crypts showed nonspecific weak staining, and a few CRC cases exhibited moderate nuclear reactivity (3 BRAF-mutant and 10 BRAF wild-type cases). BRAF-mutated CRC patients had higher pathologic stages and worse survival than BRAF wild-type patients. Conclusions: BRAF VE1 immunohistochemistry showed high sensitivity and specificity, but occasional nonspecific staining in tumor cell nuclei and normal colonic crypts may limit their routine clinical use. Thus, BRAF VE1 immunohistochemistry may be a useful screening tool for BRAF V600E mutation in CRCs, provided that additional sequencing studies can be done to confirm the mutation in BRAF VE1 antibody-positive cases.
참고문헌 (17)
- Barras D, "BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer: an update", Biomark Cancer, 7(Suppl 1), pp.9~12 (2015)
- Boulagnon C, "BRAFV600E gene mutation in colonic adenocarcinomas: immunohistochemical detection using tissue microarray and clinicopathologic characteristics: an 86 case series", Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol, 24, pp.88~96 (2016)[DOI]
- Ritterhouse LL, "BRAF V600E mutation-specific antibody: a review", Semin Diagn Pathol, 32, pp.400~408 (2015)[DOI]
- Safaee Ardekani G, "The prognostic value of BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer and melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis", PLoS One, 7, pp.e47054~ (2012)[DOI]
- Bloe JR, "BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry is reliable in primary and metastatic colorectal carcinoma regardless of treatment status and shows high intratumoral homogeneity", Am J Surg Pathol, 38, pp.1418~1428 (2014)[DOI]
- Mesteri I, "Improved molecular classification of serrated lesions of the colon by immunohistochemical detection of BRAF V600E", Mod Pathol, 27, pp.135~144 (2014)[DOI]
- Loes IM, "Performance comparison of three BRAF V600E detection methods in malignant melanoma and colorectal cancer specimens", Tumour Biol, 36, pp.1003~1013 (2015)[DOI]
- Schafroth C, "VE1 immunohistochemistry predicts BRAF V600E mutation status and clinical outcome in colorectal cancer", Oncotarget, 6, pp.41453~41463 (2015)
- Gonzalez de Castro D, "A comparison of three methods for detecting KRAS mutations in formalin-fixed colorectal cancer specimens", Br J Cancer, 107, pp.345~351 (2012)[DOI]
- Lang AH, "Optimized allelespecific real-time PCR assays for the detection of common mutations in KRAS and BRAF", J Mol Diagn, 13, pp.23~28 (2011)[DOI]
- Shin SJ, "Feasibility of multiplexed gene mutation detection in plasma samples of colorectal cancer patients by mass spectrometric genotyping", PLoS One, 12, pp.e0176340~ (2017)[DOI]
- Zlobec I, "Clinicopathological and protein characterization of BRAF- and K-RAS-mutated colorectal cancer and implications for prognosis", Int J Cancer, 127, pp.367~380 (2010)
- Lochhead P, "Microsatellite instability and BRAF mutation testing in colorectal cancer prognostication", J Natl Cancer Inst, 105, pp.1151~1156 (2013)[DOI]
- Ogino S, "CpG island methylator phenotype, microsatellite instability, BRAF mutation and clinical outcome in colon cancer", Gut, 58, pp.90~96 (2009)[DOI]
- Adackapara CA, "Immunohistochemistry using the BRAF V600E mutation-specific monoclonal antibody VE1 is not a useful surrogate for genotyping in colorectal adenocarcinoma", Histopathology, 63, pp.187~193 (2013)[DOI]
- Qiu T, "Detection of BRAF mutation in Chinese tumor patients using a highly sensitive antibody immunohistochemistry assay", Sci Rep, 5, pp.9211~ (2015)[DOI]
- Ogino S, "Distinct molecular features of colorectal carcinoma with signet ring cell component and colorectal carcinoma with mucinous component", Mod Pathol, 19, pp.59~68 (2006)[DOI]