본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Retrospective Clinical Trial of Fusidic Acid versus Petrolatum in the Postprocedure Care of Clean Dermatologic Procedures

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류피부과학

초록

Background: Clean dermatologic procedures create woundswith a low risk of infection (usually up to 5%). Whether theuse of topical antibiotics is advocated, with regard to itsefficacy and safety issues such as antibiotic resistance andsensitizing potential, is controversial. Fusidic acid, a topicalantibiotic against gram-positive bacteria, is a rare sensitizerand commonly used in postprocedure care in Korea. Objective: This is a retrospective study aimed at comparingthe efficacy and safety between fusidic acid and petrolatumfor the postprocedure care of clean dermatologic procedures. Methods: Patients were treated with either fusidic acid orpetrolatum ointment, applied on the wound created duringclean dermatologic procedures such as biopsy of the punch,incisional, excisional, and shave types. The efficacy, adverseevents, and subjective level of satisfaction were retrievedfrom medical records. Results: A total of 414 patients with atotal of 429 wounds were enrolled. The overall rate of adverseevents was 0.9%, and the rates of adverse events in the fusidicacid group and the petrolatum group were 1.4% and 0.5%,respectively (p=0.370). There was no wound discharge,pain, tenderness, swelling, induration, or dehiscence in bothgroups. The patients’ self-assessment of the wound was notsignificantly different between the two treatment groups. Conclusion: Our findings support the hypothesis that theroutine prophylactic use of topical antibiotics is not indicatedfor clean dermatologic procedures. We recommend the useof petrolatum in the postoperative care of clean dermatologicprocedures because of its equivalent efficacy and superiorsafety profiles.

Abstract

Background: Clean dermatologic procedures create woundswith a low risk of infection (usually up to 5%). Whether theuse of topical antibiotics is advocated, with regard to itsefficacy and safety issues such as antibiotic resistance andsensitizing potential, is controversial. Fusidic acid, a topicalantibiotic against gram-positive bacteria, is a rare sensitizerand commonly used in postprocedure care in Korea. Objective: This is a retrospective study aimed at comparingthe efficacy and safety between fusidic acid and petrolatumfor the postprocedure care of clean dermatologic procedures. Methods: Patients were treated with either fusidic acid orpetrolatum ointment, applied on the wound created duringclean dermatologic procedures such as biopsy of the punch,incisional, excisional, and shave types. The efficacy, adverseevents, and subjective level of satisfaction were retrievedfrom medical records. Results: A total of 414 patients with atotal of 429 wounds were enrolled. The overall rate of adverseevents was 0.9%, and the rates of adverse events in the fusidicacid group and the petrolatum group were 1.4% and 0.5%,respectively (p=0.370). There was no wound discharge,pain, tenderness, swelling, induration, or dehiscence in bothgroups. The patients’ self-assessment of the wound was notsignificantly different between the two treatment groups. Conclusion: Our findings support the hypothesis that theroutine prophylactic use of topical antibiotics is not indicatedfor clean dermatologic procedures. We recommend the useof petrolatum in the postoperative care of clean dermatologicprocedures because of its equivalent efficacy and superiorsafety profiles.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Del Rosso JQ, "Topical antibiotics: therapeutic value or ecologic mischief?", Dermatol Ther, 22, pp.398~406 (2009)
  2. Garner JS, "CDC guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections, 1985. Supersedes guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections published in 1982. (Originally published in November 1985)", Infect Control, 7, pp.193~200 (1986)
  3. Dixon AJ, "Prospective study of wound infections in dermatologic surgery in the absence of prophylactic antibiotics", Dermatol Surg, 32, pp.819~826 (2006)
  4. Futoryan T, "Postoperative wound infection rates in dermatologic surgery", Dermatol Surg, 21, pp.509~514 (1995)
  5. Cook JL, "A prospective evaluation of the incidence of complications associated with Mohs micrographic surgery", Arch Dermatol, 139, pp.143~152 (2003)
  6. Bencini PL, "Antibiotic prophylaxis of wound infections in skin surgery", Arch Dermatol, 127, pp.1357~1360 (1991)
  7. Rogers HD, "Prospective study of wound infections in Mohs micrographic surgery using clean surgical technique in the absence of prophylactic antibiotics", J Am Acad Dermatol, 63, pp.842~851 (2010)
  8. Maragh SL, "Prospective evaluation of surgical site infection rate among patients with Mohs micrographic surgery without the use of prophylactic antibiotics", J Am Acad Dermatol, 59, pp.275~278 (2008)
  9. McHugh SM, "The role of topical antibiotics used as prophylaxis in surgical site infection prevention", J Antimicrob Chemother, 66, pp.693~701 (2011)
  10. Heal CF, "Does single application of topical chloramphenicol to high risk sutured wounds reduce incidence of wound infection after minor surgery? Prospective randomised placebo controlled double blind trial", BMJ, 338, pp.a2812~ (2009)
  11. Dire DJ, "Prospective evaluation of topical antibiotics for preventing infections in uncomplicated soft-tissue wounds repaired in the ED", Acad Emerg Med, 2, pp.4~10 (1995)
  12. Dixon AJ, "Randomized clinical trial of the effect of applying ointment to surgical wounds before occlusive dressing", Br J Surg, 93, pp.937~943 (2006)
  13. Campbell RM, "Gentamicin ointment versus petrolatum for management of auricular wounds", Dermatol Surg, 31, pp.664~669 (2005)
  14. Smack DP, "Infection and allergy incidence in ambulatory surgery patients using white petrolatum vs bacitracin ointment. A randomized controlled trial", JAMA, 276, pp.972~977 (1996)
  15. Del Rosso JQ, "Status report on antibiotic resistance: implications for the dermatologist", Dermatol Clin, 25, pp.127~132 (2007)
  16. Gehrig KA, "Allergic contact dermatitis to topical antibiotics: Epidemiology, responsible allergens, and management", J Am Acad Dermatol, 58, pp.1~21 (2008)
  17. Warshaw EM, "North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 2009 to 2010", Dermatitis, 24, pp.50~59 (2013)
  18. Sheth VM, "Postoperative topical antimicrobial use", Dermatitis, 19, pp.181~189 (2008)
  19. Taylor SC, "Postprocedural woundhealing efficacy following removal of dermatosis papulosa nigra lesions in an African American population: a comparison of a skin protectant ointment and a topical antibiotic", J Am Acad Dermatol, 64(3 Suppl), pp.S30~S35 (2011)
  20. Draelos ZD, "A comparison of postprocedural wound care treatments: do antibiotic-based ointments improve outcomes?", J Am Acad Dermatol, 64(3 Suppl), pp.S23~S29 (2011)
  21. Morris SD, "Comparative frequency of patch test reactions to topical antibiotics", Br J Dermatol, 146, pp.1047~1051 (2002)
  22. Eaglstein WH, "Moist wound healing with occlusive dressings: a clinical focus", Dermatol Surg, 27, pp.175~181 (2001)
  23. Levender MM, "Use of topical antibiotics as prophylaxis in clean dermatologic procedures", J Am Acad Dermatol, 66, pp.445~451 (2012)
  24. Trookman NS, "Treatment of minor wounds from dermatologic procedures: a comparison of three topical wound care ointments using a laser wound model", J Am Acad Dermatol, 64(3 Suppl), pp.S8~S15 (2011)
  25. Sachs B, "Anaphylaxis and toxic epidermal necrolysis or Stevens-Johnson syndrome after nonmucosal topical drug application:fact or fiction?", Allergy, 62, pp.877~883 (2007)
  26. Tam CC, "Allergic contact dermatitis caused by white petrolatum on damaged skin", Dermatitis, 17, pp.201~203 (2006)
  27. Kang H, "Allergic contact dermatitis to white petrolatum", J Dermatol, 31, pp.428~430 (2004)
  28. Mason BW, "Fusidic acid resistance in community isolates of methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and the use of topical fusidic acid: a retrospective case-control study", Int J Antimicrob Agents, 23, pp.300~303 (2004)
  29. Sule O, "Fusidic acid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (FRSA) carriage in patients with atopic eczema and pattern of prior topical fusidic acid use", Int J Antimicrob Agents, 30, pp.78~82 (2007)
  30. Schöfer H, "Fusidic acid in dermatology: an updated review", Eur J Dermatol, 20, pp.6~15 (2010)
  31. Shah M, "High levels of fusidic acid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in dermatology patients", Br J Dermatol, 148, pp.1018~1020 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

Effect of the Recombinant Human Epidermal Growth Factor Ointment on Cutaneous Surgical Wounds Compared to Antibiotic Ointment김고은, 김일환, 류숙인, 문혜림, 박종헌, 정재영대한피부과학회 · Annals of Dermatology2021 · 제33권 제6호Inappropriate Topical Antibiotics Use in Clean Dermatological Procedures in South Korea in 2018: A Nationwide Population-Based Cross-Sectional StudyKi Duk Kim, Min Soo Park, Sang Jun Eun대한가정의학회 · Korean Journal of Family Medicine2022 · 제43권 제4호Antibiotic Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus in Atopic Dermatitis: Current Prevalence of Methicillin- Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Korea and Treatment Strategies박지호, 양준모, 이동윤, 이혜영, 정미영, 정종윤대한피부과학회 · Annals of Dermatology2015 · 제27권 제4호An Open Label, Multi-Center, Non-Interventional Post-Marketing Surveillance to Monitor the Safety and Efficacy of ALTARGOⓇ (Retapamulin) Administered in Korean Patients According to the Prescribing Information노영석, 박천욱, 윤문수, 이일섭, 홍우성대한피부과학회 · Annals of Dermatology2018 · 제30권 제4호Change in Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Skin-Colonizing Staphylococcus aureus in Korean Patients with Atopic Dermatitis during Ten-Year Period고현창, 김도원, 김문범, 김병수, 김정민, 박정민, 장호선, 조주현, 진현주대한피부과학회 · Annals of Dermatology2016 · 제28권 제4호Clindamycin Mono-Therapy of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study김동현, 문수진, 신정우, 안지혜, 윤문수, 이희정대한피부과학회 · Annals of Dermatology2021 · 제33권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (30건)