앞안쪽관자엽절제술 후 발작이 지속된 간질 환자의수술 후 전기임상적 특성
Postoperative Electroclinical Features in Epilepsy Patients With Seizures After Anteromesial Temporal Resection
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
ackground: Anteromesial temporal resection (AMTR) is well established as effective in patients with intractable mesial temporal epilepsy. However, little electroclinical information is available relevant to poor surgical outcome after AMTR. We examined the postoperative electroclinical features based on postoperative MRI and video-EEG monitoring (VEM) in patients with poor surgical outcome. Methods: We reviewed clinical features and postoperative VEM results in 20 patients with failure in AMTR. According to the postoperative electroclinical features, we classified them into mesial temporal (MT), bitemporal (BT), extramesial temporal (XMT), combined (C), and unclassified groups. The postoperative VEM results were compared among the groups. Surgical outcome was assessed in five patients who underwent reoperation. Results: Patients comprised 6 MT, 2 BT, 6 XMT, 1 C, and 6 unclassified. Aura and automatism were more frequent in MT (50.0%, 83.3%) than in XMT (16.7%, 33.3%). Theta to delta rhythm, during the ictal onset and build-up period, was more frequent in MT (83.3%, 66.7%) than in XMT (33.3%, 33.3%). The ictal onset and build-up pattern of ictal EEG were most frequently localized to the frontotemporal region in MT (66.7%, 100.0%), while there was no predominantly localized region in XMT. The surgical outcome after reoperation was better in MT group than in XMT and C groups. Conclusions: Postoperative MRI and VEM are useful to assess the postoperative electroclinical features in failed AMTR. Reoperation of the residual mesiotemporal structures after confirming epileptogenic foci may have good surgical outcome.
Abstract
ackground: Anteromesial temporal resection (AMTR) is well established as effective in patients with intractable mesial temporal epilepsy. However, little electroclinical information is available relevant to poor surgical outcome after AMTR. We examined the postoperative electroclinical features based on postoperative MRI and video-EEG monitoring (VEM) in patients with poor surgical outcome. Methods: We reviewed clinical features and postoperative VEM results in 20 patients with failure in AMTR. According to the postoperative electroclinical features, we classified them into mesial temporal (MT), bitemporal (BT), extramesial temporal (XMT), combined (C), and unclassified groups. The postoperative VEM results were compared among the groups. Surgical outcome was assessed in five patients who underwent reoperation. Results: Patients comprised 6 MT, 2 BT, 6 XMT, 1 C, and 6 unclassified. Aura and automatism were more frequent in MT (50.0%, 83.3%) than in XMT (16.7%, 33.3%). Theta to delta rhythm, during the ictal onset and build-up period, was more frequent in MT (83.3%, 66.7%) than in XMT (33.3%, 33.3%). The ictal onset and build-up pattern of ictal EEG were most frequently localized to the frontotemporal region in MT (66.7%, 100.0%), while there was no predominantly localized region in XMT. The surgical outcome after reoperation was better in MT group than in XMT and C groups. Conclusions: Postoperative MRI and VEM are useful to assess the postoperative electroclinical features in failed AMTR. Reoperation of the residual mesiotemporal structures after confirming epileptogenic foci may have good surgical outcome.
참고문헌 (28)
- Nishio S, "Temporal lobe epilepsy: a clinicopathological study with special reference to temporal neocortical changes", Neurosurg Rev, 23, pp.84~89 (2000)
- Engel J Jr, "Practice parameter: temporal lobe and localized neocortical resections for epilepsy: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, in association with the American Epilepsy Society and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons", Neurology, 60, pp.538~547 (2003)
- Erdem A, "Reoperation of a recurrent temporal lobe epilepsy: a technical case report", Surg Neurol, 64(2), pp.102~105 (2005)
- Awad IA, "Reoperation for intractable seizures", Clin Neurosurg, 39, pp.125~139 (1992)
- Awad IA, "Second operation after the failure of previous resection for epilepsy", Neurosurgery, 28, pp.510~518 (1991)
- Germano IM, "Reoperation for recurrent temporal lobe epilepsy", J Neurosurg, 81, pp.31~36 (1994)
- Schwartz TH, "Strategies for reoperation after comprehensive epilepsy surgery", J Neurosurg, 95, pp.615~623 (2001)
- Gonzalez-Martinez JA, "Long-term seizure outcome in reoperation after failure of epilepsy surgery", Neurosurgery, 60, pp.873~880 (2007)
- Siegel AM, "Resective reoperation for failed epilepsy surgery: seizure outcome in 64 patients", Neurology, 63, pp.2298~2302 (2004)
- Salanova V, "Temporal lobe epilepsy: analysis of failures and the role of reoperation", Acta Neurol Scand, 111, pp.126~133 (2005)
- Kim O, "Prognostic factors in anterior temporal lobectomy patients and predictability of prognosis by discriminant analysis", J Korean Neurol Assoc, 17, pp.816~822 (1999)
- Yoo Y, "Anterior temporal lobectomy with tailored hippocampectomy: review of 100 cases with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy", J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 26, pp.676~680 (1997)
- Hong S, "Epilepsy Surgery II", J Korean Med Assoc, 49, pp.347~357 (2006)
- Aghakhani Y, "Patients with temporoparietal ictal symptoms and inferomesial EEG do not benefit from anterior temporal resection", Epilepsia, 45, pp.230~236 (2004)
- Wieser HG, "ILAE Commission Report. Proposal for a new classification of outcome with respect to epileptic seizures following epilepsy surgery", Epilepsia, 42, pp.282~286 (2001)
- Alsaadi TM, "Potentially misleading extratemporal lobe lesions in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 74, pp.566~569 (2003)
- Cascino GD, "Operative strategy in patients with MRI-identified dual pathology and temporal lobe epilepsy", Epilepsy Res, 14, pp.175~182 (1993)
- Diehl B, "Worsening seizures after surgery for focal epilepsy due to emergence of primary generalized epilepsy", Neurology, 51, pp.1178~1180 (1998)
- Maillard L, "Semiologic and electrophysiologic correlations in temporal lobe seizure subtypes", Epilepsia, 45, pp.1590~1599 (2004)
- Haut SR, "Interrater reliability among epilepsy centers: multicenter study of epilepsy surgery", Epilepsia, 43, pp.1396~1401 (2002)
- Risinger MW, "Ictal localization of temporal lobe seizures with scalp", sphenoidal recordings, 1989, pp.39, 1288~1293
- Hashiguchi K, "Correlation between scalp-recorded electroencephalographic and electrocorticographic activities during ictal period", Seizure, 16, pp.238~247 (2007)
- Nayel MH, "Extent of mesiobasal resection determines outcome after temporal lobectomy for intractable complex partial seizures", Neurosurgery, 29, pp.55~60 (1991)
- McKhann GM 2nd, "Intraoperative hippocampal electrocorticography to predict the extent of hippocampalresection in temporal lobe epilepsy surgery", J Neurosurg, 93, pp.44~52 (2000)
- Wyler AR, "Results of reoperation for failed epilepsy surgery", J Neurosurg, 71, pp.815~819 (1989)
- Spencer DD, "Access to the posterior medial temporal lobe structures in the surgical treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy", Neurosurgery, 15, pp.667~671 (1984)
- Gleissner U, "Memory outcome after selective amygdalohippocampectomy in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: one-year follow-up", Epilepsia, 45, pp.960~962 (2004)
- Kim H, "Effects of anterior temporal lobectomy for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy on intellectual and memory functions: 1-year follow-up", J Korean Neurol Assoc, 24, pp.347~355 (2006)