Kirkpatrick의 4단계 평가 모델을 활용한 이종욱-서울 프로젝트 1차년도 성과 평가
Evaluation of first year outcomes of Lee Jong-Wook Seoul Project using Kirkpatrick’s four-level evaluation approach
1
조회
0
다운로드
16
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The Lee Jong-Wook Seoul Project, which began in 2011, is a training program that aims to educate faculty membersof Lao University of Health Sciences in medical knowledge and skills. The project has tremendous significance, attempting to applythe Korean health care developmental model to developing countries. Precise evaluation of the project outcome must be performedto enhance the effectiveness, improve the shortcomings, and adjust the future direction of the program. Methods: Trainers and exchange professors were asked to fill out questionnaires in the middle and at the end of the program. Eight months after its completion, an evaluation team visited Lao and interviewed each exchange professor individually. Also,360-degree feedback was obtained from their colleagues. We analyzed the answers to the questionnaires, based on Kirkpatrick’s4-level model. Results: The trainers and exchange professors had positive reactions to the program. All participants felt that their knowledge andskills improved (in their respective fields), although the actual improvement was not extensive, according to their trainers' assessments. The 360-degree feedback demonstrated that the participants actively passed on their experience, knowledge, and skills to their colleagueson returning to work. Conclusion: Although a 4-level evaluation was not conducted and despite the limitations in examining academic achievement,interviewing Lao professors, and acquiring quantitative data at Lao University of Health Sciences, this project has demonstratedits value in the development of individual professors and their colleagues.
Abstract
Purpose: The Lee Jong-Wook Seoul Project, which began in 2011, is a training program that aims to educate faculty membersof Lao University of Health Sciences in medical knowledge and skills. The project has tremendous significance, attempting to applythe Korean health care developmental model to developing countries. Precise evaluation of the project outcome must be performedto enhance the effectiveness, improve the shortcomings, and adjust the future direction of the program. Methods: Trainers and exchange professors were asked to fill out questionnaires in the middle and at the end of the program. Eight months after its completion, an evaluation team visited Lao and interviewed each exchange professor individually. Also,360-degree feedback was obtained from their colleagues. We analyzed the answers to the questionnaires, based on Kirkpatrick’s4-level model. Results: The trainers and exchange professors had positive reactions to the program. All participants felt that their knowledge andskills improved (in their respective fields), although the actual improvement was not extensive, according to their trainers' assessments. The 360-degree feedback demonstrated that the participants actively passed on their experience, knowledge, and skills to their colleagueson returning to work. Conclusion: Although a 4-level evaluation was not conducted and despite the limitations in examining academic achievement,interviewing Lao professors, and acquiring quantitative data at Lao University of Health Sciences, this project has demonstratedits value in the development of individual professors and their colleagues.
참고문헌 (17)
- "OECD Development Assistance Committee" (2013)[URL]
- 고경민, "공적개발원조(ODA)와 국익: 한국 ODA 정책의 발전을 위한 함의", 한국과 국제정치, 26(3), pp.95~128 (2010), 극동문제연구소
- Shin JS, "Lee Jong-Wook Seoul Project: the 1st year training program and educational performance evaluation report" (2011), Korea Foundation for International Healthcare
- Development Assistance Committee, "DAC principles for evaluation of development assistance" (1991), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
- Development Assistance Committee, "Paris Declaration on aide effectiveness: ownership, harmonisation, alignment, results, and mutual accountability" (2005), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
- Kirkpatrick DL, "Techniques for evaluating training programs", J Am Soc Train Dir, 13, pp.21~26 (1959)
- Bates R., "A critical analysis of evaluation practice : the Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence", Eval Program Plann, 27, pp.341~347 (2004)
- 안금희, "실무교육 프로그램의 효과평가", 임상간호연구, 9(1), pp.17~28 (2003), 병원간호사회
- 정현수, "International Collaborative Faculty Development Program on Simulation-Based Healthcare Education: A Report on Its Successes and Challenges", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 24(4), pp.319~327 (2012), 한국의학교육학회[DOI]
- Yardley S, "Kirkpatrick's levels and education ‘evidence’", Med Educ, 46, pp.97~106 (2012)
- Oh IK., "Evaluating learning effectiveness of web-based training in terms of the Kirkpatrick’s 4-level model", J Corp Educ, 2, pp.71~92 (2000)
- 김소영, "CIPP 평가모형과 Kirkpatrick 평가모형을 활용한 중소기업 훈련 컨소시엄 사업의 성과 평가연구", 직업교육연구, 30(1), pp.51~74 (2011), 한국직업교육학회
- Peterson PL, "Students’ aptitudes and their reports of cognitive processes during direct instruction", J Educ Psychol, 74, pp.535~547 (1982)
- Peterson PL, "Students’cognitions and time on task during mathematics instruction", Am Educ Res J, 21, pp.487~515 (1984)
- 홍계훈, "훈련에 대한 개인수준에서의 반응평가 모델 개발: Kirkpatrick의 모델을 기초로 하여", 조직과 인사관리연구, 32(4), pp.1~27 (2008), 한국인사관리학회
- Goldstein IL, "Training in organizations: needs assessment, development, and evaluation" (2002), Wadsworth Thomson Learning
- Rossett A., "Leveling the levels", Train Dev, 61, pp.49~53 (2007)