통합교육과정에서 녹화된 강의 동영상을 활용한 동료평가분석 연구
Peer review analysis of lectures using video recordings in an integrated curriculum
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of the peer review in an integrated curriculum and to guide furtherimprovements of curriculum. Methods: In 2012, Seoul National University College of Medicine implemented a peer review system for 11 courses in an integratedcurriculum. For each lecture, two reviewers conducted the rating using a 10-item questionnaire on a 4-point scale. We analyzedthe correlation between total scores and each item and the inter-rater reliability between the two reviewers by Pearson correlation. Further, the link between peer review scores and the student lecture evaluation was analyzed. Results: The mean total score for the checklist rating was 31.3 (out of 40.0), and the mean score for each item ranged from 2.65to 3.35 (out of 4.00). The correlation coefficient between the total score and each item was high, ranging from 0.656 to 0.849,except for three items. The mean of difference scores between reviewers was 5.03, and the correlation coefficient was significantlyhigh, which ranged from 0.968 to 0.999. The peer reviews scores and student lecture evaluations generally correlated, but therewere some outlying exceptions; the correlation coefficient was 0.105 and 0.093. Conclusion: Peer review is a useful method for improving the quality of lectures in an integrated curriculum by monitoring theobjectives, contents, and methods of the lectures and providing feedback to the professors.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of the peer review in an integrated curriculum and to guide furtherimprovements of curriculum. Methods: In 2012, Seoul National University College of Medicine implemented a peer review system for 11 courses in an integratedcurriculum. For each lecture, two reviewers conducted the rating using a 10-item questionnaire on a 4-point scale. We analyzedthe correlation between total scores and each item and the inter-rater reliability between the two reviewers by Pearson correlation. Further, the link between peer review scores and the student lecture evaluation was analyzed. Results: The mean total score for the checklist rating was 31.3 (out of 40.0), and the mean score for each item ranged from 2.65to 3.35 (out of 4.00). The correlation coefficient between the total score and each item was high, ranging from 0.656 to 0.849,except for three items. The mean of difference scores between reviewers was 5.03, and the correlation coefficient was significantlyhigh, which ranged from 0.968 to 0.999. The peer reviews scores and student lecture evaluations generally correlated, but therewere some outlying exceptions; the correlation coefficient was 0.105 and 0.093. Conclusion: Peer review is a useful method for improving the quality of lectures in an integrated curriculum by monitoring theobjectives, contents, and methods of the lectures and providing feedback to the professors.
참고문헌 (20)
- Kim YI, "Integrated curriculum: a pedagogical background in medical school", Korean J Med Educ, 10, pp.1~10 (1998)
- Ham TH, "The approaches of the faculty to medical education at Western Reserve University", J Med Educ, 34, pp.1163~1174 (1959)
- Ahn DS, "Current situation of medical integrated curriculum in Korea", Korean J Med Educ, 12(Suppl), pp.68~ (2000)
- Basic study for curriculum development of medical school, "Kim YI", Propulsion Research Group for Medical School in Korea, ~ (2003)
- Lee YM, "Evaluation of integrated lectures at Korea University, College of Medicine", Korean J Med Educ, 12, pp.343~351 (2000)
- 신종호, "대학수업 개선을 위한 수업에서의 동료평가 프로그램 도입 방안 탐색", 한국교원교육연구, 30(1), pp.201~230 (2013), 한국교원교육학회
- Peer review of teaching in Australian higher education: a handbook to support institutions in developing and embedding effective policies and practices, "Harris K", The University of Melbourne, Centre for the Study of Higher Education, ~ (2008)
- Horowitz S, "Successful peer review of courses : a case study", Acad Med, 73, pp.266~271 (1998)
- Kim S, "What' s new in medical education?", Korean J Med Educ, 10, pp.383~384 (1998)
- 이혜범, "의과대학 우수 강의자의 특성에 관한 연구", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 25(1), pp.47~53 (2013), 한국의학교육학회[DOI]
- 임은정, "의학교육에서 수업의 전문성 향상을 위한 ‘좋은 수업’의 요건 탐색", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 22(2), pp.101~111 (2010), 한국의학교육학회
- 한신일, "한국대학의 강의평가실태 분석", 교육행정학연구, 23(3), pp.379~404 (2005), 한국교육행정학회
- 홍경선, "대학교 강의평가에 나타난 일관적 응답 분석", 교육정보미디어연구, 12(2), pp.97~127 (2006), 한국교육정보미디어학회
- Woloschuk W, "What factors affect students' overall ratings of a course?", Acad Med, 86, pp.640~643 (2011)
- 오선아, "학생 관점에서 본 통합교육과정 평가", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 19(4), pp.305~311 (2007), 한국의학교육학회
- Bacro TR, "Evaluation of a lecture recording system in a medical curriculum", Anat Sci Educ, 3, pp.300~308 (2010)
- 백선용, "의학 강의의 질 개선을 위한 동영상 수업 분석 및 그 활용도 연구", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 23(4), pp.263~274 (2011), 한국의학교육학회
- Seong TJ, "Modern educational evaluation", pp.420~ (2010), Hakjisa
- Wachtel HK, "Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: a brief review", Assess Eval High Educ, 23, pp.191~212 (1998)
- Kulik JA, "Student ratings: validity, utility, and controversy", New Dir Inst Res, 2001, pp.9~25 (2001)