자기주도학습을 도입한 임상실습에서 의과대학생이 설정한 학습목표, 방법 및 의견과 자기평가 점수의 분석
Medical Students' Goals, Methods and Opinions on Self-directed Learning
1
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the goals, methods and opinions of medical students on self-directed learning(SDL) and to compare the self-assessments with faculty-evaluations. Methods: The study group included 90 medical students doing their clerkship in the department of Laboratory Medicine, Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, from August 2005 to October 2006. Students were asked to review cases, formulate learning goals, implement appropriate learning strategies and present learning outcomes. Students' opinions on SDL were collected. Their self-assessments were compared with the faculty evaluation scores using the same checklist. Three groups were defined according to the faculty scores: scores >12, high; scores 10~12, middle; scores <9, low. Results: SDL was helpful in increasing confidence in students’ own learning abilities and in raising interest in the patient-doctor relationship. Some students had difficulty formulating learning goals on their own. The mean of the self-assessments was significantly higher than that of faculty mean(11.8±2.1 vs. 10.9±2.3, p=.005). Rater agreement by items was approximately 30%. There was significant interaction between raters and group. Among the ‘high’ group, 55% under-rated their scores to middle or low levels, whereas 66% of the ‘low’ group rated themselves higher to high or middle levels. Spearman's correlation coefficient between faculty’s and student's scores was r=.219(p=.038) and 4.4% of the faculty evaluations was predicted by the self-assessment scores. Conclusion: These results suggest that SDL is an effective learning tool during clerkship. Since students' scores did not correlate with those of the faculty’s, students need to develop appropriate self-assessment skills.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the goals, methods and opinions of medical students on self-directed learning(SDL) and to compare the self-assessments with faculty-evaluations. Methods: The study group included 90 medical students doing their clerkship in the department of Laboratory Medicine, Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, from August 2005 to October 2006. Students were asked to review cases, formulate learning goals, implement appropriate learning strategies and present learning outcomes. Students' opinions on SDL were collected. Their self-assessments were compared with the faculty evaluation scores using the same checklist. Three groups were defined according to the faculty scores: scores >12, high; scores 10~12, middle; scores <9, low. Results: SDL was helpful in increasing confidence in students’ own learning abilities and in raising interest in the patient-doctor relationship. Some students had difficulty formulating learning goals on their own. The mean of the self-assessments was significantly higher than that of faculty mean(11.8±2.1 vs. 10.9±2.3, p=.005). Rater agreement by items was approximately 30%. There was significant interaction between raters and group. Among the ‘high’ group, 55% under-rated their scores to middle or low levels, whereas 66% of the ‘low’ group rated themselves higher to high or middle levels. Spearman's correlation coefficient between faculty’s and student's scores was r=.219(p=.038) and 4.4% of the faculty evaluations was predicted by the self-assessment scores. Conclusion: These results suggest that SDL is an effective learning tool during clerkship. Since students' scores did not correlate with those of the faculty’s, students need to develop appropriate self-assessment skills.
참고문헌 (23)
- Abraham, R.R., "Self-directed learning", Adv Physiol Educ, 29(2), pp.135~136 (2005)
- Ainoda, N., "Definitions and goals of “self-directed learning” in contemporary medical education literature", Ann Acad Med Singapore, 34(8), pp.515~519 (2005)
- Bryan, R.E., "Assessing professionalism in early medical education: experience with peer evaluation and self-evaluation in the gross anatomy course", Ann Acad Med Singapore, 34(8), pp.486~491 (2005)
- Chae, S.J., "Comparison of the academic achievement by self- directed learning readiness levels in a hybrid problem based learning course", Korean J Med Educ, 16(3), pp.281~288 (2004)
- Chaves, J.F., "Self, peer, and tutor assessments of MSN competencies using the PBL-evaluator", J Nurs Educ, 45(1), pp.25~31 (2006)
- Das, M., "Self and tutor evaluations in problem- based learning tutorials: is there a relationship?", Med Educ, 32(4), pp.411~418 (1998)
- Davis, D.A., "Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review", JAMA, 296(9), pp.1094~1102 (2006)
- Dolmans, D.H., "Problem-based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research", Med Educ, 39(7), pp.732~741 (2005)
- Hiramanek, N., "Self directed learning and continuing medical education", Aust Fam Physician, 34(10), pp.879~880 (2005)
- Kim, J.Y., "Does tutor evaluation in the PBL course assess different aspects of learning from what written examination assesses?", Korean J Med Educ, 17(1), pp.37~47 (2005)
- Knowles, M., "Self directed learning: a guide for learners and teachers" (1975), Association Press
- Kruger, J., "Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self- assessments", J Pers Soc Psychol, 77(6), pp.1121~1134 (1999)
- Langendyk, V., "Not knowing that they do not know: self-assessment accuracy of third-year medical students", Med Educ, 40(2), pp.173~179 (2006)
- Levett-Jones, T.L., "Self-directed learning: implications and limitations for undergraduate nursing education", Nurse Educ Today, 25(5), pp.363~368 (2005)
- Lind, D.S., "Competency-based student self-assessment on a surgery rotation", J Surg Res, 105(1), pp.31~34 (2002)
- Mandel, L.S., "Self-assessment of resident surgical skills: is it feasible?", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 193(5), pp.1817~1822 (2005)
- Mattheos, N., "The interactive examination: assessing students' self-assessment ability", Med Educ, 38(4), pp.378~389 (2004)
- Minter, R.M., "Gender differences in the self-assessment of surgical residents", Am J Surg, 189(6), pp.647~650 (2005)
- Pierre, R.B., "Student self-assessment in a paediatric objective structured clinical examination", West Indian Med J, 54(2), pp.144~148 (2005)
- Rudy, D.W., "Self-and peer assessment in a first-year communication and interviewing course", Eval Health Prof, 24(4), pp.436~445 (2001)
- Sullivan, M.E., "Peer and self assessment during problem-based tutorials", Am J Surg, 177(3), pp.266~269 (1999)
- Violato, C., "Self and peer assessment of pediatricians, psychiatrists and medicine specialists: implications for self-directed learning", Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 11(3), pp.235~244 (2006)
- Weiss, P.M., "How do medical student self-assessments compare with their final clerkship grades?", Med Teach, 27(5), pp.445~449 (2005)
