의학전문대학원 신입생 선발에서의 Multiple Mini-Interview
Multiple Mini-Interview in Selecting Medical Students
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Selecting medical students through interviews seems difficult and the reliability of the results is one of the major concerns. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and acceptability of the Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) in selecting medical students of Kangwon National University. Methods: Eighty-four applicants participated in the MMI which consists of 3 8-minute stations that have 9 checklist items and 3 global items. The 3 domains that we chose were motivation to become a doctor, communication and interpersonal skills, and ethical decision-making. We placed 2 interviewers in each room. The interviewers were chosen from our faculty. We analyzed the reliability of the MMI with urGENOVA for PC. We conducted a survey of these applicants and interviewers. Results: The reliability was 0.791. Students answered that the interview was impressive and enjoyable. Students were also satisfied with the level and quality of the MMI cases. They described that they were evaluated objectively. Interviewers also responded positively. They stated that more stations and more efforts to develop the cases were needed to improve the reliability and validity. Conclusion: The MMI was acceptable to our applicants and faculty. It is reliable for assessing medical school applicants in Korea. We should develop more stations and better cases to increase the reliability and validity of the MMI.
Abstract
Purpose: Selecting medical students through interviews seems difficult and the reliability of the results is one of the major concerns. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and acceptability of the Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) in selecting medical students of Kangwon National University. Methods: Eighty-four applicants participated in the MMI which consists of 3 8-minute stations that have 9 checklist items and 3 global items. The 3 domains that we chose were motivation to become a doctor, communication and interpersonal skills, and ethical decision-making. We placed 2 interviewers in each room. The interviewers were chosen from our faculty. We analyzed the reliability of the MMI with urGENOVA for PC. We conducted a survey of these applicants and interviewers. Results: The reliability was 0.791. Students answered that the interview was impressive and enjoyable. Students were also satisfied with the level and quality of the MMI cases. They described that they were evaluated objectively. Interviewers also responded positively. They stated that more stations and more efforts to develop the cases were needed to improve the reliability and validity. Conclusion: The MMI was acceptable to our applicants and faculty. It is reliable for assessing medical school applicants in Korea. We should develop more stations and better cases to increase the reliability and validity of the MMI.
참고문헌 (20)
- Morrison J, "How to choose tomorrow's doctors", Med Educ, 39, pp.240~242 (2005)
- Lumsden MA, "Assessment of personal qualities in relation to admission to medical school", Med Educ, 39, pp.258~265 (2005)
- Hughes P, "Can we improve on how we select medical students?", J R Soc Med, 95, pp.18~22 (2002)
- Lee K, "Simcheungmyeonjeop: Je12cha Uihakgyoyukhapdonghaksuldaehoe gyeolgwabogoseo", pp.131~145 (2002), Araminswae
- Eva KW, "An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview", Med Educ, 38, pp.314~326 (2004)
- 박혜숙, "임상실습 전 학생과 임상실습 후 학생에서 시행한 객관구조화진료시험(OSCE) 평가", 한국의학교육, 16(1), pp.63~72 (2004), 한국의학교육학회
- Brownell K, "Introduction of the multiple mini interview into the admissions process at the University of Calgary: acceptability and feasibility", Med Teach, 29, pp.394~396 (2007)
- Harris S, "Discerning quality: using the multiple mini-interview in student selection for the Australian National University Medical School", Med Educ, 41, pp.234~241 (2007)
- Edwards JC, "The interview in the admission process", Acad Med, 65, pp.167~177 (1990)
- Pendleton D, "Interviews in the selection of partners, trainees, and medical students", J R Coll Gen Pract, 38, pp.147~148 (1988)
- Searle J, "Selection for medical school: just pick the right students and the rest is easy!", Med Educ, 37, pp.458~463 (2003)
- Lemay JF, "Assessment of non-cognitive traits through the admissions multiple mini-interview", Med Educ, 41, pp.573~579 (2007)
- Downing SM, "Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data", Med Educ, 38, pp.1006~1012 (2004)
- McManus IC, "Factors affecting likelihood of applicants being offered a place in medical schools in the United Kingdom in 1996 and 1997: retrospective study", BMJ, 317, pp.1111~1116 (1998)
- Shaw DL, "Influence of medical school applicants' demographic and cognitive characteristics on interviewers' ratings of noncognitive traits", Acad Med, 70, pp.532~536 (1995)
- Eva KW, "The relationship between interviewers' characteristics and ratings assigned during a multiple mini-interview", Acad Med, 79, pp.602~609 (2004)
- Albanese MA, "Assessing personal qualities in medical school admissions", Acad Med, 78, pp.313~321 (2003)
- Bullimore DW, "Selection interviewing for medical school admission", Med Educ, 26, pp.347~349 (1992)
- Lowe M, "Is it possible to assess the "ethics" of medical school applicants?", J Med Ethics, 27, pp.404~408 (2001)
- Reiter HI, "The effect of defined violations of test security on admissions outcomes using multiple mini-interviews", Med Educ, 40, pp.36~42 (2006)