의대생의 학년별 환자-의사 관계 평가 비교
Comparison of Patient-Physician Interaction (PPI) Evaluation between Different Grade Medical Students
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: A proper patient-physician interaction (PPI) creates rapport between doctors and patients and improves medical outcomes. The importance of PPI evaluation items was evaluated in each medical student in grades 3 and 4, before and after their clinical clerkship. Methods: Six PPI evaluation guidelines (SEGUE, Kalamazoo Consensus, Calgary-Cambridge Guide, Macy guideline, 2 Korean Consortium guidelines) were selected and importance of each guideline was evaluated through the structured questionnaire in 73pre-clinical clerkship (3rd-grade) and 78 post-clinical clerkship (4th-grade) medical students. Results: The importance of medical communication items among total clinical performance, students-rated PPI portion was 21±9.7%. In SEGUE recommendations, 'Elicit information' was evaluated to be most important items before (58.3%) and after (65.8%)clinical clerkship. In Kalamazoo Consensus, 'Gathering information' was evaluated to be most important (49.3%/42.3%), same as in Calgary-Cambridge Guide (52.1%/56.4%) and Daegu Gyeongbuk Consortium (47.9%/43.6%). In the Macy guideline, 'Listening'was evaluated to be most important (28.8%/33.3%). In the Seoul Gyeonggi Consortium, 'Buidling relationships' was evaluated to be most important (23.3%/28.2%). Conclusion: In the 4th-grade post-clerkship medical students after clinical clerkship, importance of 'Gathering information' was evaluated to be less important, however, 'Giving information' and 'Understanding the patient perspective' was evaluated to be more important, compared to pre-clerkship students 3rd-grade students.
Abstract
Purpose: A proper patient-physician interaction (PPI) creates rapport between doctors and patients and improves medical outcomes. The importance of PPI evaluation items was evaluated in each medical student in grades 3 and 4, before and after their clinical clerkship. Methods: Six PPI evaluation guidelines (SEGUE, Kalamazoo Consensus, Calgary-Cambridge Guide, Macy guideline, 2 Korean Consortium guidelines) were selected and importance of each guideline was evaluated through the structured questionnaire in 73pre-clinical clerkship (3rd-grade) and 78 post-clinical clerkship (4th-grade) medical students. Results: The importance of medical communication items among total clinical performance, students-rated PPI portion was 21±9.7%. In SEGUE recommendations, 'Elicit information' was evaluated to be most important items before (58.3%) and after (65.8%)clinical clerkship. In Kalamazoo Consensus, 'Gathering information' was evaluated to be most important (49.3%/42.3%), same as in Calgary-Cambridge Guide (52.1%/56.4%) and Daegu Gyeongbuk Consortium (47.9%/43.6%). In the Macy guideline, 'Listening'was evaluated to be most important (28.8%/33.3%). In the Seoul Gyeonggi Consortium, 'Buidling relationships' was evaluated to be most important (23.3%/28.2%). Conclusion: In the 4th-grade post-clerkship medical students after clinical clerkship, importance of 'Gathering information' was evaluated to be less important, however, 'Giving information' and 'Understanding the patient perspective' was evaluated to be more important, compared to pre-clerkship students 3rd-grade students.
참고문헌 (13)
- Weinberger M, "he impact of clinical encounter events on patient and physician satisfaction", Soc Sci Med E, 15, pp.239~244 (1981)
- Maguire P, "Consultation skills of young doctors: I--Benefits of feedback training in interviewing as student's persist", Br Med J (Clin Res Ed), 292, pp.1573~1576 (1986)
- Bowman FM, "McGrath G. Improving the skills of established general practitioners:the long- term benefits of group teaching", Med Educ, 26, pp.63~68 (1992)
- Fallowfield L, "Enduring impact of communication skills training: results of a 12-month follow-up", Br J Cancer, 89, pp.1445~1449 (2003)
- Winefield HR, "Evaluating the outcome of communication skill teaching for entry-level medical students: dose knowledge of empathy increase?", Med Educ, 34, pp.90~94 (2000)
- Evans BJ, "Effects of communication skills training on students' diagnostic efficiency", Med Educ, 25, pp.517~526 (1991)
- Yedidia MJ, "Effect of communication training on medical student performenece", JAMA, 290, pp.1157~1165 (2003)
- Makoul G, "The SEGUE framework for teaching and assessing communication skills", Patient Educ Couns, 45, pp.23~34 (2001)
- Makoul G, "Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the Kalamazoo consensus statement", Acad Med, 76, pp.390~393 (2001)
- Kurtz S, "Marrying content and process in clinical method teaching:enhancing the Calgary-Cambridge guides", Acad Med, 78, pp.802~809 (2003)
- Kalet A, "Teaching communication in clinical clerkships: models from the Macy Initiative in Health Communications", Acad Med, 79, pp.511~520 (2004)
- 이영미, "의료대화 수업의 실기시험과 임상진료시험에서 환자-의사관계 점수의 연관성", 한국의학교육, 20(4), pp.313~320 (2008), 한국의학교육학회
- 안서원, "전공의와 환자의 의사-환자 관계에 대한 상호 인식 조사", 한국의학교육, 18(3), pp.279~288 (2006), 한국의학교육학회