본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

성격 유형이 임상수행능력시험 결과에 미치는 영향

The Effect of Personal Character on the Results of Clinical Performance Skill Tests

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타의약학

초록

Purpose: Even though many studies have indicated that the personality of medical students affects learning style and academic achievement, the effect of personality types on the performance skill tests has not been well known in the medical field due to the rarity of published papers. Thus, the aim of this study was to reveal the effect of personal traits on clinical skill performance tests. Methods: Fifty-seven fourth-grade medical students were enrolled in this study. They had all completed clinical performance tests. To assess personality types, we used the Korean version of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Results: Fifty-five of 57 senior medical students responded completely to the MBTI questionnaire. The proportion of four paired MBTI dimensions was Introversion (I)-Extroversion (E) (67.3% vs. 32.7%), Sensing (S)-Intuition (I) (76.4% vs. 23.6%), Thinking (T)-Feeling (F) (61.8% vs. 38.2%), and Judging (J)-Perception (P) (56.4% vs. 43.6%). The dominant personality types were ISTJ (23.6%), ESTJ (14.5%), and ISTP (10.9%). The first objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) test showed higher scores in Extraversion,Judging, and Sensing-Judging types compared to the counterparts (p<0.05), but this effect was not observed in the second OSCE test. On the clinical performance examination, Extraversion, Sensing, and Judging types had a higher score, as measured by standardized patients. Conclusion: Specific personal traits affect the test scores of the clinical performance skill examinations. So, personality measurement might be a useful tool for understanding a student who has difficulty in performance tests. We hope this study will give valuable information to examiners when they instruct and counsel students about clinical performance tests.

Abstract

Purpose: Even though many studies have indicated that the personality of medical students affects learning style and academic achievement, the effect of personality types on the performance skill tests has not been well known in the medical field due to the rarity of published papers. Thus, the aim of this study was to reveal the effect of personal traits on clinical skill performance tests. Methods: Fifty-seven fourth-grade medical students were enrolled in this study. They had all completed clinical performance tests. To assess personality types, we used the Korean version of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Results: Fifty-five of 57 senior medical students responded completely to the MBTI questionnaire. The proportion of four paired MBTI dimensions was Introversion (I)-Extroversion (E) (67.3% vs. 32.7%), Sensing (S)-Intuition (I) (76.4% vs. 23.6%), Thinking (T)-Feeling (F) (61.8% vs. 38.2%), and Judging (J)-Perception (P) (56.4% vs. 43.6%). The dominant personality types were ISTJ (23.6%), ESTJ (14.5%), and ISTP (10.9%). The first objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) test showed higher scores in Extraversion,Judging, and Sensing-Judging types compared to the counterparts (p<0.05), but this effect was not observed in the second OSCE test. On the clinical performance examination, Extraversion, Sensing, and Judging types had a higher score, as measured by standardized patients. Conclusion: Specific personal traits affect the test scores of the clinical performance skill examinations. So, personality measurement might be a useful tool for understanding a student who has difficulty in performance tests. We hope this study will give valuable information to examiners when they instruct and counsel students about clinical performance tests.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. Myers IB, "manual: a guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator" (2003), Consulting Psychologists Press
  2. 박훈기, "객관구조화진료시험(OSCE; Objective Structured Clinical Examination)의 임상적 활용", 한국의학교육, 16(1), pp.13~24 (2004), 한국의학교육학회
  3. Brinton DA, "A small-group instruction experiment in medical education", J Med Educ, 59, pp.13~18 (1984)
  4. McNulty JA, "Personality preference influences medical student use of specific computer-aided instruction (CAI)", BMC Med Educ, 6, pp.7~ (2006)
  5. Richardson J, "Factors that influence first year medical students' choice of student selected component", Med Teach, 31, pp.418~424 (2009)
  6. Davies SM, "The impact of student learning styles on interviewing skills and academic performance", Teach Learn Med, 9, pp.131~135 (1997)
  7. Kim S, "A study on the relationship between personality, study satisfaction and academic achievement of medical students", Korean J Med Educ, 11, pp.271~284 (1999)
  8. 김선, "의과대학생 성격과 학업성취도 비교를 통한 교육방법", 한국의학교육, 17(2), pp.107~120 (2005), 한국의학교육학회
  9. Stilwell NA, "Myers-Briggs type and medical specialty choice: a new look at an old question", Teach Learn Med, 12, pp.14~20 (2000)
  10. Hojat M, "Personality and specialty interest in medical students", Med Teach, 30, pp.400~406 (2008)
  11. Hecker K, "How much do differences in medical schools influence student performance? A longitudinal study employing hierarchical linear modeling", Teach Learn Med, 20, pp.104~113 (2008)
  12. Harrington R, "The relationship between life satisfaction, self-consciousness, and the Myers-Briggs type inventory dimensions", J Psychol, 135, pp.439~450 (2001)
  13. Thompson JA, "Physicians' reactions to learning style and personality type inventories", Med Teach, 20, pp.10~14 (1998)
  14. Clack GB, "Personality differences between doctors and their patients: implications for the teaching of communication skills", Med Educ, 38, pp.177~186 (2004)
  15. Boyle GJ, "Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI): some psychometric limitations", Aust Psychol, 30, pp.71~74 (1995)
  16. Wu S, "Personality types of Chinese dental school applicants", J Dent Educ, 71, pp.1593~1598 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)