Potential bias factors that affect the course evaluation of students in preclinical courses
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: We aim to identify what potential bias factors affected students’ overall course evaluation, and to observe what factors should be considered in the curriculum evaluation system of medical schools. Methods: This study analyzed students’ ratings of preclinical instructions at the Ajou University School of Medicine. The ratings of instructions involved 41 first-year and 45 second-year medical students. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between years of study and ratings’ scoring. Learning difficulty, learning amount, student assessment, and teacher preparation from second-year students were significantly higher than first-year students (p<0.05). The analysis results revealed that student assessment was the predictor of ratings from first-year students, while teacher preparation was the predictor of ratings from second-year students. Conclusion: We found significant interactions between year of study and the students’ rating results. We were able to confirm that satisfaction of instructions factors perceived by medical students were different for the characteristics of courses. Our results may be an important resource for evaluating preclinical curriculums.
Abstract
Purpose: We aim to identify what potential bias factors affected students’ overall course evaluation, and to observe what factors should be considered in the curriculum evaluation system of medical schools. Methods: This study analyzed students’ ratings of preclinical instructions at the Ajou University School of Medicine. The ratings of instructions involved 41 first-year and 45 second-year medical students. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between years of study and ratings’ scoring. Learning difficulty, learning amount, student assessment, and teacher preparation from second-year students were significantly higher than first-year students (p<0.05). The analysis results revealed that student assessment was the predictor of ratings from first-year students, while teacher preparation was the predictor of ratings from second-year students. Conclusion: We found significant interactions between year of study and the students’ rating results. We were able to confirm that satisfaction of instructions factors perceived by medical students were different for the characteristics of courses. Our results may be an important resource for evaluating preclinical curriculums.
참고문헌 (21)
- 채수진, "학생에 의한 강의평가에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 27(1), pp.19~25 (2015), 한국의학교육학회[DOI]
- Elzubeir M, "Evaluating the quality of teaching in medical education: are we using the evidence for both formative and summative purposes?", Med Teach, 24, pp.313~319 (2002)
- Donnon T, "Student and teaching characteristics related to ratings of instruction in medical sciences graduate programs", Med Teach, 32, pp.327~332 (2010)
- Woloschuk W, "What factors affect students’ overall ratings of a course?", Acad Med, 86, pp.640~643 (2011)
- Stratton TD, "Validating dental and medical students’ evaluations of faculty teaching in an integrated, multi-instructor course", J Dent Educ, 69, pp.663~670 (2005)
- Schonrock-Adema J, "Necessary steps in factor analysis:enhancing validation studies of educational instruments. The PHEEM applied to clerks as an example", Med Teach, 31, pp.e226~e232 (2009)
- Marsh HW, "Students’ evaluations of university teaching:dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential baises, and utility", J Educ Psychol, 76, pp.707~754 (1984)
- Howard GS, "Construct validity of measures of college teaching effectiveness", J Educ Psychol, 77, pp.187~196 (1985)
- Centra JA, "Reflective faculty evaluation: enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness" (1993), Jossey-Bass
- Feldman KA, "Class size and college students' evaluations of teachers and courses: a closer look", Res High Educ, 21, pp.45~116 (1984)
- Feldman KA, "College students’ views of male and female college teachers: part I. evidence from the social laboratory and experiments", Res High Educ, 33, pp.317~375 (1992)
- Hofman JE, "Attitudes toward higher education and course evaluation", J Educ Psychol, 72, pp.610~617 (1980)
- Stratton TD, "Medical students’ ratings of faculty teaching in a multi-instructor setting: an examination of monotonic response patterns", Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 7, pp.99~116 (2002)
- Leamon MH, "Measuring teaching effectiveness in a pre-clinical multi-instructor course: a case study in the development and application of a brief instructor rating scale", Teach Learn Med, 17, pp.119~129 (2005)
- 채수진, "국내 의과대학 강좌평가제 운영 실태 분석", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 19(2), pp.133~142 (2007), 한국의학교육학회
- Beck AH, "The Flexner report and the standardization of American medical education", JAMA, 291, pp.2139~2140 (2004)
- Frank JR, "Competency-based medical education: theory to practice", Med Teach, 32, pp.638~645 (2010)
- Huang L, "Curriculum reform at Chinese medical schools: what have we learned?", Med Teach, 36, pp.1043~1050 (2014)
- Bandiera G, "Integration and timing of basic and clinical sciences education", Med Teach, 35, pp.381~387 (2013)
- Brauer DG, "The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE guide no. 96", Med Teach, 37, pp.312~322 (2015)
- 채수진, "Longitudinal analysis of the effect of academic failure tolerance on academic achievement fluctuation in medical school students", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 28(1), pp.25~28 (2016), 한국의학교육학회