본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

An analysis of verbs used in the course outcomes of outcome-based integrated courses at a medical school based on the taxonomy of educational objectives

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타의약학

초록

Purpose: The purposes of this study were to analyze the course outcomes of integrated courses of a medical school that introduced an outcome-based curriculum and to suggest ways to improve techniques in the description of outcomes. Methods: In order to investigate the course outcomes of 39 courses in the first and second grades at Kyungpook National University School of Medicine in Korea, verbs for the course outcome were classified according to Bloom’s taxonomy and frequency analysis was completed. The appropriateness of use of verbs in description of the outcomes was also analyzed. Results: The total number of course outcomes for both grades was 497. The number of course outcomes per credit ranged from a minimum of 0.9 to a maximum of 22.0. Most of the course outcomes were classified as the comprehension domain according to Bloom’s taxonomy. The most frequently used verb was “explain,” accounting for 61.0% (n=303) of the entire course outcome verbs. Some verbs in the outcomes, however, were unmeasurable. Conclusion: The major findings of this study include the followings. First, the number of course outcomes varied according to courses. Second, several course outcomes included unmeasurable verbs. Finally, most of the verbs used to describe course outcome belonged to the two lower levels of Bloom’s taxonomy—knowledge and comprehension. In order to improve the description of course outcomes, this study suggests that it is necessary to adjust the number of course outcomes, applicate overt behavior verbs, and elevate the level of course outcomes from the lower memorizing level to the higher application level.

Abstract

Purpose: The purposes of this study were to analyze the course outcomes of integrated courses of a medical school that introduced an outcome-based curriculum and to suggest ways to improve techniques in the description of outcomes. Methods: In order to investigate the course outcomes of 39 courses in the first and second grades at Kyungpook National University School of Medicine in Korea, verbs for the course outcome were classified according to Bloom’s taxonomy and frequency analysis was completed. The appropriateness of use of verbs in description of the outcomes was also analyzed. Results: The total number of course outcomes for both grades was 497. The number of course outcomes per credit ranged from a minimum of 0.9 to a maximum of 22.0. Most of the course outcomes were classified as the comprehension domain according to Bloom’s taxonomy. The most frequently used verb was “explain,” accounting for 61.0% (n=303) of the entire course outcome verbs. Some verbs in the outcomes, however, were unmeasurable. Conclusion: The major findings of this study include the followings. First, the number of course outcomes varied according to courses. Second, several course outcomes included unmeasurable verbs. Finally, most of the verbs used to describe course outcome belonged to the two lower levels of Bloom’s taxonomy—knowledge and comprehension. In order to improve the description of course outcomes, this study suggests that it is necessary to adjust the number of course outcomes, applicate overt behavior verbs, and elevate the level of course outcomes from the lower memorizing level to the higher application level.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 이동엽, "학습성과의 개념과 작성에 대한 탐구", 의학교육논단, 18(3), pp.125~131 (2016), 연세대학교 의과대학
  2. 채수진, "학습성과중심교육과정에서의 교육과정 설계 탐색", 의학교육논단, 11(1), pp.3~9 (2009), 연세대학교 의과대학
  3. 안재희, "성과중심교육과정 개발절차에 대한 고찰", 의학교육논단, 15(1), pp.9~18 (2013), 연세대학교 의과대학
  4. 김선, "학습성과의 개념과 필요성", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 24(2), pp.89~92 (2012), 한국의학교육학회
  5. Harden RM, "Learning outcomes and instructional objectives: is there a difference?", Med Teach, 24(2), pp.151~155 (2002)
  6. Hauenstein AD, "New taxonomy of educational objectives" (2004), Kyoyookbook Press
  7. Kang EC, "Teaching method and professionalism of teacher" (2015), Hakjisa
  8. 한재진, "외국 의과대학에서의 성과중심교육과정 개발", 의학교육논단, 15(1), pp.19~24 (2013), 연세대학교 의과대학
  9. 최규일, "신교육목표분류학의 틀에서 본 구강보건교육학 목표 분석", 치위생과학회지, 12(3), pp.259~269 (2012), 한국치위생과학회[DOI]
  10. 신정철, "Trends of Higher Education Research: Research Topic Analysis", 한국교육, 35(3), pp.167~193 (2008), 한국교육개발원[DOI]
  11. Bloom BS, "Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals: cognitive domain" (1956), McKay
  12. 임유나, "역량기반 교육목표 개발과 분석을 위한 Hauenstein 신 교육목표분류학의 재조명", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 17(21), pp.771~797 (2017), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  13. 임선주, "성과중심교육에서 학생평가", 의학교육논단, 15(1), pp.25~30 (2013), 연세대학교 의과대학
  14. 민경석, "의학교육 학생평가의 객관성에 대한 쟁점", 의학교육논단, 15(3), pp.105~111 (2013), 연세대학교 의과대학
  15. 박장희, "성과중심교육 측면에서 우리나라 의과대학 학생평가의 현실과 과제", 의학교육논단, 15(3), pp.112~119 (2013), 연세대학교 의과대학
  16. 김민정, "Developing the Korean Association of Medical Colleges graduate outcomes of basic medical education based on “the role of Korean doctor, 2014”", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 30(2), pp.79~89 (2018), 한국의학교육학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)