본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method를 이용한 요양시설의 포괄적 약물관리 프로그램의 대상자 기준 개발

Development of Eligibility Criteria for Comprehensive Medication Management Programs in Long-term Care Facilities Using RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류약학

초록

Background: Comprehensive medication management is essential to achieve safe and optimal drug use for the elderly in long-termcare facilities (LTCF). This study aimed to develop eligibility criteria for ”Comprehensive medication management program inLTCF” using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM). Furthermore, we attempted to estimate the number ofbeneficiaries who met the criteria by analyzing the National Health Insurance claims data. Methods: Twelve criteria were selectedinitially. We composed a panel of 14 experts with expertise in long-term care. We conducted two survey rounds to reach a consensus. Rating for appropriateness and decision regarding agreement were applied per RAM. We analyzed the National Health Insurancedata to estimate the number of LTCF residents who met each eligibility criterion. Results: Of the 11 items agreed upon, ten itemswere determined to be appropriate. In 2018, 83.6% of 165,994 residents of LTCF met one or more eligibility criteria. The largestnumber of subjects met the “New residents of LTCF” criterion, followed by “Take high-alert drugs” and “Chronic excessivepolypharmacy.” Since the items evaluated as most appropriate by the expert panel and those with a large number of subjects weresimilar, we confirmed the external validity of our criteria. Conclusion: It is worth noting that this is the first attempt to establish theeligibility criteria for medication management in LTCF. Further preliminary research is needed to identify the selected subjects' drugrelatedproblems and revise the criteria according to the results.

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive medication management is essential to achieve safe and optimal drug use for the elderly in long-termcare facilities (LTCF). This study aimed to develop eligibility criteria for ”Comprehensive medication management program inLTCF” using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM). Furthermore, we attempted to estimate the number ofbeneficiaries who met the criteria by analyzing the National Health Insurance claims data. Methods: Twelve criteria were selectedinitially. We composed a panel of 14 experts with expertise in long-term care. We conducted two survey rounds to reach a consensus. Rating for appropriateness and decision regarding agreement were applied per RAM. We analyzed the National Health Insurancedata to estimate the number of LTCF residents who met each eligibility criterion. Results: Of the 11 items agreed upon, ten itemswere determined to be appropriate. In 2018, 83.6% of 165,994 residents of LTCF met one or more eligibility criteria. The largestnumber of subjects met the “New residents of LTCF” criterion, followed by “Take high-alert drugs” and “Chronic excessivepolypharmacy.” Since the items evaluated as most appropriate by the expert panel and those with a large number of subjects weresimilar, we confirmed the external validity of our criteria. Conclusion: It is worth noting that this is the first attempt to establish theeligibility criteria for medication management in LTCF. Further preliminary research is needed to identify the selected subjects' drugrelatedproblems and revise the criteria according to the results.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. "Population Projections for Korea (2020~2070)" (2021)[URL]
  2. "2020 Long Term Care Insurance Statistical Yearbook" (2021)[URL]
  3. Il-Young Jang, "Geriatrics Fact Sheet in Korea 2018 From National Statistics", Annals of geriatric medicine and research, 23(2), pp.50~53 (2019), 대한노인병학회[DOI]
  4. "2017 National survey of older Koreans: Findings and implications"[URL]
  5. "Long-term care status survey" (2019)[URL]
  6. 김정선, "노인요양시설 노인의 다약제 복용(Polypharmacy)과 부적절한 약물사용 실태", 보건의료산업학회지, 7(3), pp.237~249 (2013), 보건의료산업학회
  7. 문아름, "장기요양시설에서의 약물 관리와 약사의 역할", 약 학 회 지, 64(2), pp.166~172 (2020), 대한약학회[DOI]
  8. "Decision-making method using RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method RAM" (2010)[URL]
  9. 지선미, "RAND 방법으로 합의한 임상진료지침의 정의와 질 평가 기준", 보건행정학회지, 20(2), pp.1~16 (2010), 한국보건행정학회
  10. de Meyrick J, "The Delphi method and health research", Health Educ, 103(1), pp.7~16 (2003)
  11. "The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user’s manual" (2001)[URL]
  12. "ISMP List of High-Alert Medications in Community/Ambulatory Care Settings" (2021)[URL]
  13. "ISMP List of High-Alert Medications in Long-Term Care (LTC) Settings" (2021)[URL]
  14. Scott MG, "Integrated medicines management to medicines optimisation in Northern Ireland(2000-2014) : a review", Eur J Hosp Pharm, 22(4), pp.222~228 (2015)
  15. "Practice Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Management of High-Risk Drugs in Pharmacies"[URL]
  16. "High-risk drugs list" (2011)[URL]
  17. Polit DF, "The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations", Res Nurs Health, 29(5), pp.489~497 (2006)
  18. YusoffMSB, "ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation", Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), pp.49~54 (2019)
  19. "Program Rules Residential Medication Management Review" (2021)[URL]
  20. "Program Rules Residential Medication Management Review and Quality Use of Medicines" (2019)[URL]
  21. "Professional Pharmacy Services Guidebook 3.0: MedsCheck, Pharmaceutical Opinion and Pharmacy Smoking Cessation Program" (2016)[URL]
  22. "Structured Medication Reviews and Medicines Optimisation: Guidance" (2020)[URL]
  23. "CMS Review of Current Standards of Practice for Long-Term Care Pharmacy Services Long-Term Care Pharmacy Primer"[URL]
  24. "Long-Term Care Pharmacy Definition Act of 2020"[URL]
  25. "State Operations Manual Appendix PP-Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities F755, F756" (2017)[URL]
  26. Griese-Mammen N, "PCNE definition of medication review : reaching agreement", Int J Clin Pharm, 40(5), pp.1199~1208 (2018)
  27. Koria LG, "Impact of medication reviews on inappropriate prescribing in aged care", Curr Med Res Opin, 34(5), pp.833~838 (2018)
  28. Nishtala PS, "Impact of residential medication management reviews on Drug Burden Index in aged-care homes", Drugs Aging, 26(8), pp.677~686 (2009)
  29. Leguelinel-Blache G, "Impact of pharmacist-led multidisciplinary medication review on the safety and medication cost of the elderly people living in a nursing home : a before-after study", Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 20(5), pp.481~490 (2020)
  30. Kua C-H, "Health outcomes of deprescribing interventions among older residents in nursing homes : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Am Med Dir Assoc, 20(3), pp.362~372 (2019)
  31. Page AT, "The feasibility and effect of deprescribing in older adults on mortality and health : a systematic review and meta?analysis", Br J Clin Pharmacol, 82(3), pp.583~623 (2016)
  32. "Development and evaluation of a multidisplinary medication management program in long-term care facility residents (HC21C0069)"[URL]
  33. LaFleur J, "Prevalence of drug-related problems and cost-savings opportunities in medicaid high utilizers identified by a pharmacistrun drug regimen review center", J Manag Care Pharm, 12(8), pp.677~685 (2006)
  34. Chen EY, "Process, impact and outcomes of medication review in Australian residential aged care facilities: A systematic review", Australas J Ageing, 38(2), pp.9~25 (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)