Piloting a constructive feedback model for problem-based learning in medical education
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Constructive feedback is key to successful teaching and learning. The unique characteristics of problem-based learning (PBL) tutorials require a unique feedback intervention. Based on the review of existing literature, we developed a feedback model for PBL tutorials, as an extension of the feedback facilitator guide of Mubuuke and his colleagues. This study was aimed to examine the perceptions of students and tutors on the feedback model that was piloted in PBL tutorials. Methods: This study employed a qualitative research design. The model was tested in nine online PBL sessions, selected using the maximum variation sampling strategy based on tutors’ characteristics. All sessions were observed by the researcher. Afterwards, tutors and students in the PBL sessions were interviewed to explore their perceptions of the model. Results: Three themes were identified based on the perceptions of the tutors and students: cognitive changes, behavioral changes, and challenges of the use of the feedback model. Both tutors and students benefited from improved cognition and behavior. However, the use of the feedback model still encountered some challenges, such as limited sources of feedback data, flexibility and adaptability of the model, content of feedback delivered, students’ characteristics and performance, tutors’ characteristics and self-perceptions, and supportive infrastructure. Conclusion: The model can be used as a reference for tutors to deliver constructive feedback during PBL tutorials. The challenges identified in using the constructive feedback model include the need for synchronized guidelines, ample time to adapt to the model, and skills training for tutors.
Abstract
Purpose: Constructive feedback is key to successful teaching and learning. The unique characteristics of problem-based learning (PBL) tutorials require a unique feedback intervention. Based on the review of existing literature, we developed a feedback model for PBL tutorials, as an extension of the feedback facilitator guide of Mubuuke and his colleagues. This study was aimed to examine the perceptions of students and tutors on the feedback model that was piloted in PBL tutorials. Methods: This study employed a qualitative research design. The model was tested in nine online PBL sessions, selected using the maximum variation sampling strategy based on tutors’ characteristics. All sessions were observed by the researcher. Afterwards, tutors and students in the PBL sessions were interviewed to explore their perceptions of the model. Results: Three themes were identified based on the perceptions of the tutors and students: cognitive changes, behavioral changes, and challenges of the use of the feedback model. Both tutors and students benefited from improved cognition and behavior. However, the use of the feedback model still encountered some challenges, such as limited sources of feedback data, flexibility and adaptability of the model, content of feedback delivered, students’ characteristics and performance, tutors’ characteristics and self-perceptions, and supportive infrastructure. Conclusion: The model can be used as a reference for tutors to deliver constructive feedback during PBL tutorials. The challenges identified in using the constructive feedback model include the need for synchronized guidelines, ample time to adapt to the model, and skills training for tutors.
참고문헌 (35)
- Sandars J, "The use of reflection in medical education : AMEE guide no. 44", Med Teach, 31(8), pp.685~695 (2009)
- Rider EA, "Giving constructive feedback", JAMA, 274(11), pp.867~ (1995)[DOI]
- Winstone NE, "Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback : a systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes", Educ Psychol, 52(1), pp.17~37 (2017)
- Ramani S, "Twelve tips to promote a feedback culture with a growth mind-set : swinging the feedback pendulum from recipes to relationships", Med Teach, 41(6), pp.625~631 (2019)
- Ajjawi R, "Scaling up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education", pp.129~144 (2017), Springer Nature
- "Indones J Med Educ", 2013, 180~187
- Oktaria D, "Undergraduate medical students’perceptions on feedback-seeking behaviour", Malays J Med Sci, 25(1), pp.75~83 (2018)
- Lim WK, "Dysfunctional problem-based learning curricula : resolving the problem", BMC Med Educ, 12, pp.89~ (2012)
- de Jong N, "To what extent can PBL principles be applied in blended learning : lessons learned from health master programs", Med Teach, 39(2), pp.203~211 (2017)
- Shamsan B, "Evaluation of problem based learning course at college of medicine, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia", Int J Health Sci(Qassim), 3(2), pp.249~258 (2009)
- Archer JC, "State of the science in health professional education : effective feedback", Med Educ, 44(1), pp.101~108 (2010)
- Carr S, "The Foundation Programme assessment tools : an opportunity to enhance feedback to trainees?", Postgrad Med J, 82(971), pp.576~579 (2006)
- Sargeant J, "Facilitated reflective performance feedback : developing an evidence-and theory-based model that builds relationship, explores reactions and content, and coaches for performance change(R2C2)", Acad Med, 90(12), pp.1698~1706 (2015)
- Mubuuke AG, "Utilizing students’ experiences and opinions of feedback during problem based learning tutorials to develop a facilitator feedback guide : an exploratory qualitative study", BMC Med Educ, 16, pp.6~ (2016)
- "Indones J Med Educ", 2016, 88~100
- Carless D, "Scaling up assessment for learning in higher education" (2017), Springer Nature
- Telio S, "The"educational alliance"as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education", Acad Med, 90(5), pp.609~614 (2015)
- Lipnevich AA, "Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback" (2018), Cambridge University Press;
- Henderson M, "The impact of feedback in higher education" (2019), Palgrave Macmillan;
- Zelenski AB, "Beyond"read more" : an intervention to improve faculty written feedback to learners", J Grad Med Educ, 11(4), pp.468~471 (2019)
- "Indones J Med Educ", 2013, 159~173
- Creswell JW, "Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design:Choosing among Five Approaches", pp.53~84 (2007), Sage Publication Inc
- Lockspeiser TM, "Understanding the experience of being taught by peers : the value of social and cognitive congruence", Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 13(3), pp.361~372 (2008)
- Anderson PA, "Giving feedback on clinical skills : are we starving our young?", J Grad Med Educ, 4(2), pp.154~158 (2012)
- Kollar I, "Peer assessment as collaborative learning : a cognitive perspective", Learn instr, 20(4), pp.344~348 (2010)
- Hattie J, "The power of feedback", Rev Educ Res, 77(1), pp.81~112 (2007)
- Kluger AN, "The effects of feedback interventions on performance : a historical review, a metaanalysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory", Psychol Bull, 119(2), pp.254~284 (1996)
- "Med J Lampung Univ", 2019, 76~84
- Helms JL, "Comparing student performance in online and face-to-face delivery modalities", J Async Learn Netw, 18(1), pp.1~14 (2014)
- Ng ML, "Designing, implementing and evaluating an online problem-based learning(PBL)environment : a pilot study", Clin Linguist Phon, 28(1-2), pp.117~130 (2014)
- De Jong N, "The role of the e-tutor in synchronous online problem-based learning : a study in a Master Public Health Programme", Br J Educ Technol, 49(3), pp.385~397 (2018)
- Sargeant J, "The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback", pp.289~312 (2018), Cambridge University Press
- Henderson M, "The challenges of feedback in higher education", Assess Eval High Educ, 44(8), pp.1237~1252 (2019)
- Sefton AE, "A Practical Guide of Medical Teachers", pp.166~172 (2013), Churchill Livingstone
- Kindler P, "Difficult incidents and tutor interventions in problembased learning tutorials", Med Educ, 43(9), pp.866~873 (2009)