Scoping review: exploring residents’ views of supervisor entrustment and its effect on learning and professional development
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This scoping review aimed to systematically explore the complex and nuanced perceptions of residents entrusted with significant responsibilities by their supervisors in the clinical context. We conducted a comprehensive search strategy targeting six major electronic databases. Data were extracted using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and a scoping review protocol. Resident perceptions regarding entrustment and its impact on learning and professional development were categorized. This review elucidated the role of supervisor entrustment in shaping residents’ clinical performance, notably influencing autonomy, self-confidence, responsibility for patients, learning needs and goals, uncertainty management, and professional identity formation. Residents identified factors that promote and hinder performance and entrustment development resulting from supervisor entrustment and distinguished between appropriate supervision and over- or under-supervision. Our review suggests that residents’ perceptions of supervisor entrustment, as bestowed by supervisors, serves as a catalyst for enhancing autonomy, thereby exerting a significant influence on clinical performance, and fostering the development of a professional identity. However, residents’ views on appropriate supervision differ in some ways from supervisors’ perspectives. Further research is needed to bridge the gap between residents’ expectations of autonomy and what they are given, and to explore the intricate relationship between autonomy and entrustment.
Abstract
This scoping review aimed to systematically explore the complex and nuanced perceptions of residents entrusted with significant responsibilities by their supervisors in the clinical context. We conducted a comprehensive search strategy targeting six major electronic databases. Data were extracted using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and a scoping review protocol. Resident perceptions regarding entrustment and its impact on learning and professional development were categorized. This review elucidated the role of supervisor entrustment in shaping residents’ clinical performance, notably influencing autonomy, self-confidence, responsibility for patients, learning needs and goals, uncertainty management, and professional identity formation. Residents identified factors that promote and hinder performance and entrustment development resulting from supervisor entrustment and distinguished between appropriate supervision and over- or under-supervision. Our review suggests that residents’ perceptions of supervisor entrustment, as bestowed by supervisors, serves as a catalyst for enhancing autonomy, thereby exerting a significant influence on clinical performance, and fostering the development of a professional identity. However, residents’ views on appropriate supervision differ in some ways from supervisors’ perspectives. Further research is needed to bridge the gap between residents’ expectations of autonomy and what they are given, and to explore the intricate relationship between autonomy and entrustment.
참고문헌 (41)
- Schumacher DJ, "Clarifying essential terminology in entrustment", Med Teach, 43(7), pp.737~744 (2021)
- Ten Cate O, "Entrustment decision making in clinical training", Acad Med, 91(2), pp.191~198 (2016)
- Sawatsky AP, "Autonomy and professional identity formation in residency training : a qualitative study", Med Educ, 54(7), pp.616~627 (2020)
- ten Cate O, "Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training", Med Educ, 39(12), pp.1176~1177 (2005)
- Sterkenburg A, "When do supervising physicians decide to entrust residents with unsupervised tasks?", Acad Med, 85(9), pp.1408~1417 (2010)
- Tiyyagura G, "The greater good : how supervising physicians make entrustment decisions in the pediatric emergency department", Acad Pediatr, 14(6), pp.597~602 (2014)
- Salim SY, "The construction of surgical trust : how surgeons judge residents’ readiness for operative independence", Ann Surg, 271(2), pp.391~398 (2020)
- Melvin L, "Tensions in assessment : the realities of entrustment in internal medicine", Acad Med, 95(4), pp.609~615 (2020)
- Santen SA, "Factors affecting entrustment and autonomy in emergency medicine : "how much rope do I give them?"", West J Emerg Med, 20(1), pp.58~63 (2019)
- Hauer KE, "Understanding trust as an essential element of trainee supervision and learning in the workplace", Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 19(3), pp.435~456 (2014)
- Hauer KE, "How clinical supervisors develop trust in their trainees : a qualitative study", Med Educ, 49(8), pp.783~795 (2015)
- Holzhausen Y, "Applying occupational and organizational psychology theory to entrustment decision-making about trainees in health care : a conceptual model", Perspect Med Educ, 6(2), pp.119~126 (2017)
- Ten Cate O, "The ingredients of a rich entrustment decision", Med Teach, 42(12), pp.1413~1420 (2020)
- Winn AS, "A comparison of resident self-perception and pediatric hospitalist perceptions of the supervisory needs of new interns", Hosp Pediatr, 8(4), pp.214~219 (2018)
- Meyerson SL, "Defining the autonomy gap : when expectations do not meet reality in the operating room", J Surg Educ, 71(6), pp.e64~e72 (2014)
- Biondi EA, "Discordance between resident and faculty perceptions of resident autonomy : can self-determination theory help interpret differences and guide strategies for bridging the divide?", Acad Med, 90(4), pp.462~471 (2015)
- Mattar SG, "General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship : results of a survey of fellowship program directors", Ann Surg, 258(3), pp.440~449 (2013)
- Sandhu G, "Progressive entrustment to achieve resident autonomy in the operating room : a national qualitative study with general surgery faculty and residents", Ann Surg, 265(6), pp.1134~1140 (2017)
- Kilminster S, "AMEE Guide No. 27 : effective educational and clinical supervision", Med Teach, 29(1), pp.2~19 (2007)
- Arksey H, "Scoping studies : towards a methodological framework", Int J Soc Res Methodol, 8(1), pp.19~32 (2005)
- Tricco AC, "PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews(PRISMA-ScR) : checklist and explanation", Ann Intern Med, 169(7), pp.467~473 (2018)
- Sheu L, "How supervisor experience influences trust, supervision, and trainee learning : a qualitative study", Acad Med, 92(9), pp.1320~1327 (2017)
- Gin BC, "How supervisor trust affects early residents’ learning and patient care : a qualitative study", Perspect Med Educ, 10(6), pp.327~333 (2021)
- Crockett C, "Learning to drive : resident physicians’ perceptions of how attending physicians promote and undermine autonomy", BMC Med Educ, 19(1), pp.293~ (2019)
- Kshetrapal A, "Overextending : a qualitative study of trainees learning at the edge of evolving expertise", J Grad Med Educ, 14(3), pp.295~303 (2022)
- Rivard SJ, "Resident perceptions of faculty behaviors promoting learner operative skills and autonomy", J Surg Educ, 79(2), pp.431~440 (2022)
- Randle RW, "Surgical trainees’ sense of responsibility for patient outcomes : a multi-institutional appraisal", J Surg Res, 255, pp.58~65 (2020)
- LaDonna KA, "Staging a performance : learners’ perceptions about direct observation during residency", Med Educ, 51(5), pp.498~510 (2017)
- Wojcik BM, "The residentrun minor surgery clinic : a four-year analysis of patient outcomes, satisfaction, and resident education", J Surg Educ, 78(6), pp.1838~1850 (2021)
- Sagasser MH, "Self-entrustment : how trainees’ selfregulated learning supports participation in the workplace", Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 22(4), pp.931~949 (2017)
- Woelfel I, "The construction of case-specific resident learning goals", J Surg Educ, 77(4), pp.859~865 (2020)
- Apramian T, "“Staying in the game”: how procedural variation shapes competence judgments in surgical education", Acad Med, 91(11 Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions), pp.S37~S43 (2016)
- Bochatay N, "Learning to manage uncertainty:supervision, trust and autonomy in residency training", Sociol Health Illn, 42(Suppl 1), pp.145~159 (2020)
- Zhao B, "Making the jump : a qualitative analysis on the transition from bedside assistant to console surgeon in robotic surgery training", J Surg Educ, 77(2), pp.461~471 (2020)
- George SJ, "Preparing for CBME : how often are faculty observing residents?", Paediatr Child Health, 26(2), pp.88~92 (2020)
- Deci EL, "The"what"and"why"of goal pursuits : human needs and the self-determination of behavior", Psychol Inq, 11(4), pp.227~268 (2000)
- Ten Cate TJ, "How selfdetermination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. AMEE guide No. 59", Med Teach, 33(12), pp.961~973 (2011)
- Kusurkar RA, "Autonomy support for autonomous motivation in medical education", Med Educ Online, 20, pp.27951~ (2015)
- Young KA, "Characterizing the relationship between surgical resident and faculty perceptions of autonomy in the operating room", J Surg Educ, 74(6), pp.e31~e38 (2017)
- Torbeck L, "Identification of behaviors and techniques for promoting autonomy in the operating room", Surgery, 158(4), pp.1102~1112 (2015)
- Light D Jr, "Uncertainty and control in professional training", J Health Soc Behav, 20(4), pp.310~322 (1979)