본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

Teaching clinical reasoning: principles from the literature to help improve instruction from the classroom to the bedside

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타의약학

초록

Clinical reasoning has been characterized as being an essential aspect of being a physician. Despite this, clinical reasoning has a variety of definitions and medical error, which is often attributed to clinical reasoning, has been reported to be a leading cause of death in the United States and abroad. Further, instructors struggle with teaching this essential ability which often does not play a significant role in the curriculum. In this article, we begin with defining clinical reasoning and then discuss four principles from the literature as well as a variety of techniques for teaching these principles to help ground an instructors’ understanding in clinical reasoning. We also tackle contemporary challenges in teaching clinical reasoning such as the integration of artificial intelligence and strategies to help with transitions in instruction (e.g., from the classroom to the clinic or from medical school to residency/registrar training) and suggest next steps for research and innovation in clinical reasoning.

Abstract

Clinical reasoning has been characterized as being an essential aspect of being a physician. Despite this, clinical reasoning has a variety of definitions and medical error, which is often attributed to clinical reasoning, has been reported to be a leading cause of death in the United States and abroad. Further, instructors struggle with teaching this essential ability which often does not play a significant role in the curriculum. In this article, we begin with defining clinical reasoning and then discuss four principles from the literature as well as a variety of techniques for teaching these principles to help ground an instructors’ understanding in clinical reasoning. We also tackle contemporary challenges in teaching clinical reasoning such as the integration of artificial intelligence and strategies to help with transitions in instruction (e.g., from the classroom to the clinic or from medical school to residency/registrar training) and suggest next steps for research and innovation in clinical reasoning.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Connor DM, "Clinical reasoning as a core competency", Acad Med, 95(8), pp.1166~1171 (2020)
  2. Durning SJ, "Clinical reasoning and diagnostic error : a call to merge two worlds to improve patient care", Acad Med, 95(8), pp.1159~1161 (2020)
  3. Holmboe ES, "Assessing clinical reasoning : moving from in vitro to in vivo", Diagnosis(Berl), 1(1), pp.111~117 (2014)
  4. Durning SJ, "Clarifying assumptions to enhance our understanding and assessment of clinical reasoning", Acad Med, 88(4), pp.442~448 (2013)
  5. Young M, "Drawing boundaries : the difficulty in defining clinical reasoning", Acad Med, 93(7), pp.990~995 (2018)
  6. Elvén M, "Clinical reasoning curricula in health professions education : a scoping review", J Med Educ Curric Dev, 10, pp.23821205231209093~ (2023)
  7. Young M, "The terminology of clinical reasoning in health professions education : implications and considerations", Med Teach, 41(11), pp.1277~1284 (2019)
  8. Kononowicz AA, "The need for longitudinal clinical reasoning teaching and assessment : results of an international survey", Med Teach, 42(4), pp.457~462 (2020)
  9. Rencic J, "Clinical reasoning education at US medical schools : results from a National Survey of Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors", J Gen Intern Med, 32(11), pp.1242~1246 (2017)
  10. Kim MJ, "Developing the Korean Association of Medical Colleges graduate outcomes of basic medical education based on"the role of Korean doctor, 2014"", Korean J Med Educ, 30(2), pp.79~89 (2018)
  11. Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care, "Improving diagnosis in health care" (2015), National Academies Press
  12. Cooper N, "Consensus statement on the content of clinical reasoning curricula in undergraduate medical education", Med Teach, 43(2), pp.152~159 (2021)
  13. Daniel M, "Clinical reasoning assessment methods : a scoping review and practical guidance", Acad Med, 94(6), pp.902~912 (2019)
  14. Durning SJ, "Situativity theory : a perspective on how participants and the environment can interact : AMEE guide no. 52", Med Teach, 33(3), pp.188~199 (2011)
  15. Young JQ, "Cognitive Load Theory : implications for medical education : AMEE guide no. 86", Med Teach, 36(5), pp.371~384 (2014)
  16. Ericsson KA, "Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains", Acad Med, 79(10 Suppl), pp.S70~S81 (2004)
  17. Pelaccia T, "An analysis of clinical reasoning through a recent and comprehensive approach : the dual-process theory", Med Educ Online, 16, pp.5890~ (2011)
  18. Evans JS, "Dual-process theories of higher cognition : advancing the debate", Perspect Psychol Sci, 8(3), pp.223~241 (2013)
  19. Kahneman D, "Thinking, fast and slow" (2011), Farrar, Straus and Giroux
  20. van Merriënboer JJ, "Cognitive load theory in health professional education : design principles and strategies", Med Educ, 44(1), pp.85~93 (2010)
  21. Ericsson KA, "The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance" (2018), Cambridge University Press
  22. Merkebu J, "Situativity : a family of social cognitive theories for understanding clinical reasoning and diagnostic error", Diagnosis(Berl), 7(3), pp.169~176 (2020)
  23. Schwartz A, "Clinical Reasoning in the Health Professions", pp.223~234 (2008), Elsevier
  24. Elstein AS, "Medical problem solving: an analysis of clinical reasoning" (1978), Harvard University Press
  25. Croskerry P, "The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them", Acad Med, 78(8), pp.775~780 (2003)
  26. Aagaard E, "Effectiveness of the one-minute preceptor model for diagnosing the patient and the learner : proof of concept", Acad Med, 79(1), pp.42~49 (2004)
  27. Wolpaw TM, "SNAPPS : a learnercentered model for outpatient education", Acad Med, 78(9), pp.893~898 (2003)
  28. Baker EA, "The IDEA Assessment Tool : assessing the reporting, diagnostic reasoning, and decision-making skills demonstrated in medical students’ hospital admission notes", Teach Learn Med, 27(2), pp.163~173 (2015)
  29. LeBlanc VR, "Predictable chaos : a review of the effects of emotions on attention, memory and decision making", Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 20(1), pp.265~282 (2015)
  30. Rudland JR, "The stress paradox : how stress can be good for learning", Med Educ, 54(1), pp.40~45 (2020)
  31. Sawatsky AP, "Autonomy and developing physicians : reimagining supervision using self-determination theory", Med Educ, 56(1), pp.56~63 (2022)
  32. Kozlowski D, "The role of emotion in clinical decision making : an integrative literature review", BMC Med Educ, 17(1), pp.255~ (2017)
  33. Boyle JG, "Distributed cognition : theoretical insights and practical applications to health professions education : AMEE guide no. 159", Med Teach, 45(12), pp.1323~1333 (2023)
  34. Woods NN, "On clinical reasoning research and applications : redefining expertise", Med Educ, 49(5), pp.543~ (2015)
  35. Eva KW, "On the generality of specificity", Med Educ, 37(7), pp.587~588 (2003)
  36. Koufidis C, "Representation, interaction and interpretation : making sense of the context in clinical reasoning", Med Educ, 56(1), pp.98~109 (2022)
  37. Watsjold BK, "An ecological account of clinical reasoning", Acad Med, 97(11S), pp.S80~S86 (2022)
  38. Lee J, "Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education : a scoping review", Acad Med, 96(11S), pp.S62~S70 (2021)
  39. Schaye V, "Development and validation of a machine learning model for automated assessment of resident clinical reasoning documentation", J Gen Intern Med, 37(9), pp.2230~2238 (2022)
  40. Koulaouzidis G, "Artificial intelligence in cardiology : a narrative review of current status", J Clin Med, 11(13), pp.3910~ (2022)
  41. Segato A, "Artificial intelligence for brain diseases : a systematic review", APL Bioeng, 4(4), pp.041503~ (2020)
  42. Harish V, "Artificial intelligence and clinical decision making : the new nature of medical uncertainty", Acad Med, 96(1), pp.31~36 (2021)
  43. Pinnock R, "Humans and machines : moving towards a more symbiotic approach to learning clinical reasoning", Med Teach, 42(3), pp.246~251 (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)