본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Development of the Perceived Stress Inventory: A New Questionnaire for Korean Population Surveys

1

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류가정의학

초록

Background: Given emerging evidence of the association between stress and disease, practitioners need a tool for measuring stress. Several instruments exist to measure perceived stress; however, none of them are applicable for population surveys because stress conceptualization can differ by population. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Perceived Stress Inventory (PSI) and its short version for use in population surveys and clinical practice in Korea. Methods: From a pool of perceived stress items collected from three widely used instruments, 20 items were selected for the new measurement tool. Nine of these items were selected for the short version. We evaluated the validity of the items using exploratory factor analysis of the preliminary data. To evaluate the convergent validity of the PSI, 387 healthy people were recruited and stratified on the basis of age and sex. Confirmatory analyses and examination of structural stability were also carried out. To evaluate discriminatory validity, the PSI score of a group with depressive symptoms was compared with that of a healthy group. A similar comparison was also done for persons with anxious mood. Results: Exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor construct (tension, depression, and anger) for the PSI. Reliability values were satisfactory, ranging from 0.67 to 0.87. Convergent validity was confirmed through correlation with the Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. People with depressive or anxious mood had higher scores than the healthy group on the total PSI, all three dimensions, and the short version. Conclusion: The long and short versions of the PSI are valid and reliable tools for measuring perceived stress. These instruments offer benefits for stress research using population-based surveys.

Abstract

Background: Given emerging evidence of the association between stress and disease, practitioners need a tool for measuring stress. Several instruments exist to measure perceived stress; however, none of them are applicable for population surveys because stress conceptualization can differ by population. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Perceived Stress Inventory (PSI) and its short version for use in population surveys and clinical practice in Korea. Methods: From a pool of perceived stress items collected from three widely used instruments, 20 items were selected for the new measurement tool. Nine of these items were selected for the short version. We evaluated the validity of the items using exploratory factor analysis of the preliminary data. To evaluate the convergent validity of the PSI, 387 healthy people were recruited and stratified on the basis of age and sex. Confirmatory analyses and examination of structural stability were also carried out. To evaluate discriminatory validity, the PSI score of a group with depressive symptoms was compared with that of a healthy group. A similar comparison was also done for persons with anxious mood. Results: Exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor construct (tension, depression, and anger) for the PSI. Reliability values were satisfactory, ranging from 0.67 to 0.87. Convergent validity was confirmed through correlation with the Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. People with depressive or anxious mood had higher scores than the healthy group on the total PSI, all three dimensions, and the short version. Conclusion: The long and short versions of the PSI are valid and reliable tools for measuring perceived stress. These instruments offer benefits for stress research using population-based surveys.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Richardson S, "Meta-analysis of perceived stress and its association with incident coronary heart disease", Am J Cardiol, 110, pp.1711~1716 (2012)
  2. Vinkers CH, "Stress exposure across the life span cumulatively increases depression risk and is moderated by neuroticism", Depress Anxiety, 31, pp.737~745 (2014)
  3. Huang J, "Pancreatic cancer risk after loss of a child: a register-based study in Sweden during 1991-2009", Am J Epidemiol, 178, pp.582~589 (2013)
  4. Chen YH, "Increased risk of cancer subsequent to severe depression:a nationwide population-based study", J Affect Disord, 131, pp.200~206 (2011)
  5. DeLongis A, "The impact of daily stress on health and mood: psychological and social resources as mediators", J Pers Soc Psychol, 54, pp.486~495 (1988)
  6. Levenstein S, "Development of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: a new tool for psychosomatic research", J Psychosom Res, 37, pp.19~32 (1993)
  7. Fliege H, "The Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) reconsidered: validation and reference values from different clinical and healthy adult samples", Psychosom Med, 67, pp.78~88 (2005)
  8. Koh KB, "Development of the stress response inventory and its application in clinical practice", Psychosom Med, 63, pp.668~678 (2001)
  9. 고경봉, "Development of the Stress-induced Cognition Scale", Yonsei Medical Journal, 47(3), pp.384~392 (2006), 연세대학교의과대학
  10. 최승미, "스트레스 반응 척도의 수정판 개발 및 타당화 연구 : 근로자 대상", 신경정신의학, 45(6), pp.541~553 (2006), 대한신경정신의학회
  11. Lee EH, "Korean versions of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14, 10 and 4): psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic disease", Scand J Caring Sci, 29, pp.183~192 (2015)
  12. "Projected population by age and sex"[URL]
  13. 이종하, "한글판 스트레스 자각척도의 신뢰도와 타당도 연구", 정신신체의학, 20(2), pp.127~134 (2012), 한국정신신체의학회
  14. Kim JJ, "A reliability and validity of Korean version of Daily Stress Inventory", J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc, 37, pp.295~305 (1998)
  15. Brantley PJ, "A Daily Stress Inventory:development, reliability, and validity", J Behav Med, 10, pp.61~74 (1987)
  16. Han KS, "Influencing factors on symptoms of stress of middle aged women", J Korean Acad Nurs, 30, pp.1427~1436 (2000)
  17. Cho MJ, "Diagnostic validity of the CES-D (Korean version) in the assessment of DSM-III-R major depression", J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc, 32, pp.381~399 (1993)
  18. Hahn DW, "Korean adaptation of Spielberger’s STAI (K-STAI)", Korean J Health Psychol, 1, pp.1~14 (1996)
  19. 조영신, "류마티스 질환에서 한국어판 EQ-5D의교차문화적 적응과 타당도 평가", 대한류마티스학회지, 12(3), pp.173~188 (2005), 대한류마티스학회
  20. 이현욱, "Association between Metabolic Syndrome and Microalbuminuria in Korean Adults", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 36(2), pp.60~71 (2015), 대한가정의학회
  21. American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, text revision" (2000), American Psychiatric Association
  22. Min SK., "A study on the concept of hwa-byung", J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc, 28, pp.604~661 (1989)
  23. Min SK., "Hwa-byung and the psychology of haan", J Korean Med Assoc, 34, pp.1189~1198 (1991)
  24. Cohen S, "A global measure of perceived stress", J Health Soc Behav, 24, pp.385~396 (1983)
  25. Golden-Kreutz DM, "Assessing stress in cancer patients: a second-order factor analysis model for the Perceived Stress Scale", Assessment, 11, pp.216~223 (2004)
  26. Lehman KA, "Development of the brief inventory of perceived stress", J Clin Psychol, 68, pp.631~644 (2012)
  27. Min SK, "The anger syndrome hwa-byung and its comorbidity.", J Affect Disord, 124, pp.211~214 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)