본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

의학논문 보고지침

Reporting Guidelines of Medical Research

이정운
대한가정의학회 (The Korean Academy Of Family Medicine)|2009.01|Korean Journal of Family Medicine|제30권 제1호|pp. 1-14

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Reporting Guidelines
주제분류가정의학

초록

Medical research should be reported transparently so that readers can follow what was planned, what was done, what was found, and what conclusion was drawn. The credibility of research depends on a critical assessment by others of the strengths and weaknesses in study design, conduct, and analysis. Despite several decades of educational efforts, many researches still are not reported adequately. Therefore some investigators have suggested guidelines for reporting of various research results. After the initiative to improve the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCT), many other consensus across discipline for reporting guideline of meta-analysis of RCT, meta-analysis of observation study, case-control study, cohort study was developed. So we want to introduce family physicians various reporting guidelines that hope this report will contribute to assessing and improving the quality of reporting of medical researches.

Abstract

Medical research should be reported transparently so that readers can follow what was planned, what was done, what was found, and what conclusion was drawn. The credibility of research depends on a critical assessment by others of the strengths and weaknesses in study design, conduct, and analysis. Despite several decades of educational efforts, many researches still are not reported adequately. Therefore some investigators have suggested guidelines for reporting of various research results. After the initiative to improve the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCT), many other consensus across discipline for reporting guideline of meta-analysis of RCT, meta-analysis of observation study, case-control study, cohort study was developed. So we want to introduce family physicians various reporting guidelines that hope this report will contribute to assessing and improving the quality of reporting of medical researches.

참고문헌 (61)

  1. Metz CE, "Basic principles of ROC analysis", Semin Nucl Med, 8, pp.283~298 (1978)
  2. Bogardus ST Jr, "Clinical epidemiolo-gical quality in molecular genetic research: the need for metho-dological standards", JAMA, 281, pp.1919~1926 (1999)
  3. Thornley B, "Content and quality of 2000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 50 years", BMJ, 317, pp.1181~1184 (1998)
  4. Pocock SJ, "Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practice", BMJ, 329, pp.883~ (2004)
  5. Sacks HS, "Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials", N Engl J Med, 316, pp.450~455 (1987)
  6. Sacks HS, "Meta-analysis: an update", Mt Sinai J Med, 63, pp.216~224 (1996)
  7. Hotopf M, "Putting trials on trial-the costs and consequences of small trials in depression: a systematic re-view of methodology", J Epidemiol Community Health, 51, pp.354~358 (1997)
  8. Tooth L, "Quality of reporting of observational longitudinal research", Am J Epidemiol, 161, pp.280~288 (2005)
  9. Griner PF, "Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Principles and applications", Ann Intern Med, 94, pp.557~592 (1981)
  10. Dickinson K, "Size and quality of randomised controlled trials in head injury: review of published studies", BMJ, 320, pp.1308~1311 (2000)
  11. Begg C, "Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials, in The CONSORT statement", JAMA, 276, pp.637~639 (1996)
  12. Altman DG, "Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement", BMJ, 313, pp.570~571 (1996)
  13. Freemantle N, "CONSORT: an important step toward evidence-based health care. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials", Ann Intern Med, 126, pp.81~83 (1997)
  14. Huston P, "CMAJ endorses the CONSORT statement. CONsolidation of Standards for Reporting Trials", CMAJ, 155, pp.1277~1282 (1996)
  15. Schulz KF, "The quest for unbiased research: randomized clinical trials and the CONSORT reporting guidelines", Ann Neurol, 41, pp.569~573 (1997)
  16. Davidoff F, "News from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors", Ann Intern Med, 133, pp.229~231 (2000)
  17. Egger M, "Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials", JAMA, 285, pp.1996~1999 (2001)
  18. Moher D, "Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation", JAMA, 285, pp.1992~1995 (2001)
  19. Moher D, "Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses", Lancet, 354, pp.1896~1900 (1999)
  20. Stroup DF, "Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Ob-servational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group", JAMA, 283, pp.2008~2012 (2000)
  21. Bossuyt PM, "Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative", Clin Chem Lab Med, 41, pp.68~73 (2003)
  22. Bossuyt PM, "Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative", Clin Biochem, 36, pp.2~7 (2003)
  23. Bossuyt PM, "Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative", Am J Clin Pathol, 119, pp.18~22 (2003)
  24. Bossuyt PM, "Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative", Ann Intern Med, 138, pp.40~44 (2003)
  25. Bossuyt PM, "Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative", Radiology, 226, pp.24~28 (2003)
  26. Bossuyt PM, "Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative", BMJ, 326, pp.41~44 (2003)
  27. Bossuyt PM, "Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy", Clin Chem, 49, pp.1~6 (2003)
  28. Von Elm E, "The Strengthening the Reporting of Obser-vational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guide-lines for reporting observational studies", Epidemiology, 18, pp.800~804 (2007)
  29. von Elm E, "The Strengthening the Reporting of Obser-vational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guide-lines for reporting observational studies", Bull World Health Organ, 85, pp.867~872 (2007)
  30. von Elm E, "The Strengthening the Reporting of Obser-vational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guide-lines for reporting observational studies", Prev Med, 45, pp.247~251 (2007)
  31. von Elm E, "Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies", BMJ, 335, pp.806~808 (2007)
  32. von Elm E, "The Strengthening the Reporting of Obser-vational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies", PLoS Med, 4, pp.e296~ (2007)
  33. von Elm E, "The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies", Ann Intern Med, 147, pp.573~577 (2007)
  34. von Elm E, "The Strengthening the Reporting of Obser-vational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guide-lines for reporting observational studies", J Clin Epidemiol, 61, pp.344~349 (2008)
  35. Moher D, "The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials", Lancet, 357, pp.1191~1194 (2001)
  36. Moher D, "The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials", Ann Intern Med, 134, pp.657~662 (2001)
  37. Moher D, "The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials", J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 91, pp.437~442 (2001)
  38. "CONSORT: translations"[URL]
  39. "CONSORT: transparent reporting tirals"[URL]
  40. Altman DG, "The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration", Ann Intern Med, 134, pp.663~694 (2001)
  41. Chalmers I HR, "Reporting, updating, and correcting ststematic reviews of the effcts of health care, in Systematic reviews", pp.86~95 (1995), BMJ Publishing Group
  42. Cook DJ, "Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis", J Clin Epidemiol, 48, pp.167~171 (1995)
  43. Schulz KF, "Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality asso-ciated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials", JAMA, 273, pp.408~412
  44. Moher D, "Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?", Lancet, 352, pp.609~613 (1998)
  45. Easterbrook PJ, "Publi-cation bias in clinical research", Lancet, 337, pp.867~872 (1991)
  46. Cook DJ, "Should unpublished data be included in meta-analysis? Current convictions and dontroversies", JAMA, 269, pp.2749~2753 (1993)
  47. Smith ML, "Publication bias and meta-analysis", Eval Educ, 4, pp.22~24 (1980)
  48. Moher D, "Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews", Lancet, 347, pp.363~366 (1996)
  49. Berlin JA, "Invited commentary: benefits of heterogeneity in meta-analysis of data from epidemiologic studies", Am J Epide-miol, 142, pp.383~387 (1995)
  50. Stroup DF TS, "Characteristics of meta-analysis submitted to a medical journal", International Congress on Biomedical Peer Review and Global Communications
  51. Reid MC, "Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good", JAMA, 274, pp.645~651 (1995)
  52. Nelemans PJ, "Peripheral arterial disease: meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography", Radiology, 217, pp.105~114 (2000)
  53. "STARD Statement"[URL]
  54. Bossuyt PM, "The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group", Croat Med J, 44, pp.639~650 (2003)
  55. Bossuyt PM, "The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration", Ann Intern Med, 138, pp.W1~W12 (2003)
  56. Bossuyt PM, "The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration", Clin Chem, 49, pp.7~18 (2003)
  57. "The STROBE statement"[URL]
  58. Vandenbroucke JP, "Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): expla-nation and elaboration", Ann Intern Med, 147, pp.W163~W194 (2007)
  59. Vandenbroucke JP, "Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explana-tion and elaboration", PLoS Med, 4, pp.e297~ (2007)
  60. Vandenbroucke JP, "Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explana-tion and elaboration", Epidemiology, 18, pp.805~835 (2007)
  61. "Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication/from:" (2008)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

The Quality of Reporting of Cohort, Case- Control Studies in the Korean Journal of Family Medicine김미라, 김민영, 김수영, 윤여정, 황인홍대한가정의학회 · Korean Journal of Family Medicine2012 · 제33권 제2호건강증진 연구 보고지침유승현한국보건교육건강증진학회 · 보건교육건강증진학회지2012 · 제29권 제4호Statistical Trends in Family Medicine Journals권혜진, 박용규대한가정의학회 · Korean Journal of Family Medicine2012 · 제33권 제1호국내 의학 잡지에 게재된 무작위대조임상시험 논문들의 보고의 질김수영, 이경우, 황예원, 황인홍대한가정의학회 · Korean Journal of Family Medicine2008 · 제29권 제4호대한가정의학회지에 실린 무작위대조시험논문의 질 평가김수영, 이경우, 이동희, 정우빈, 황인홍대한가정의학회 · Korean Journal of Family Medicine2009 · 제30권 제8호GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evalua-tion): “근거수준(Quality of Evidence)” 이란 무엇이며, 임상의사에게 왜 중요한가?강호원, 구자윤, 정현진, Do Kyung Kim, Eu Chang Hwang, Hong Wook Kim, Jae Hung Jung대한요로생식기감염학회 · Urogenital Tract Infection2019 · 제14권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

건강한 성인에서 인슐린양 성장 인자-1의 농도 및 관련 요인최현국, 공미희, 안병훈, 이득주, 김상만, 김광민pp. 15-22춘천 지역 중년 및 노인에서의 혈청 감마지티피와 공복혈당장애의 유병률과의 상관관계: 한림노년연구홍경순, 최문기, 곽은신, 임정수, 장숙랑, 김정훈, 김동현, 최영호, 정진영, 문유선pp. 23-30간접흡연에 노출된 청소년의 요 코티닌 배설량김자형, 김현근, 이선영, 김규남, 이도훈, 김봉성, 홍수종, 유선미, 성문우, 김효빈, 이소연, 이혜령, 유장석pp. 31-38복부초음파 수검자에서 담낭용종의 유병률이정훈, 이승범, 황희진, 최상인, 신영태, 강희철, 김춘옥pp. 39-45성인 남녀에서 혈장 호모시스테인 농도와 상완: 발목 동맥파속도의 연관성윤경선, 최희정, 김상환pp. 46-54
원문 보기