본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Technology and Language – What Works and What Does Not: A Meta-analysis of Blended Learning Research

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This meta-analysis examines the effectiveness of technology employed in language-related blended-learning research by summarizing the outcomes of the measured dependent variables of 59 samples. The effect sizes yielded from the samples were acquired by applying Cohen’s (1988; 1992) d formula. The estimation was done using the standardized mean difference score, divided by the standard deviation pooled across the treatment and control groups. The findings denote that there is an overall effectiveness to blended-learning; however, the disparity of the effect sizes found implies that the effectiveness is contingent and reliant to the context and how technology is applied. There were also instances of negative effect sizes, suggesting hidden factors that adversely altered the outcomes of the technological intervention. The review also discovered that there is a pattern for performance to be used predominantly as the dependent variable in assessing the effectiveness of the technology. Nevertheless, this should not limit the use of performance as the only measure. Other dependent variables, such as motivation and attitudes, warrant consideration as indicators for measuring the efficacy of a blended-learning intervention.

Abstract

This meta-analysis examines the effectiveness of technology employed in language-related blended-learning research by summarizing the outcomes of the measured dependent variables of 59 samples. The effect sizes yielded from the samples were acquired by applying Cohen’s (1988; 1992) d formula. The estimation was done using the standardized mean difference score, divided by the standard deviation pooled across the treatment and control groups. The findings denote that there is an overall effectiveness to blended-learning; however, the disparity of the effect sizes found implies that the effectiveness is contingent and reliant to the context and how technology is applied. There were also instances of negative effect sizes, suggesting hidden factors that adversely altered the outcomes of the technological intervention. The review also discovered that there is a pattern for performance to be used predominantly as the dependent variable in assessing the effectiveness of the technology. Nevertheless, this should not limit the use of performance as the only measure. Other dependent variables, such as motivation and attitudes, warrant consideration as indicators for measuring the efficacy of a blended-learning intervention.

참고문헌 (60)

  1. Abrams, Z. I., "The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German", The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), pp.157~167 (2003)
  2. Adair-Haucks, B., "Evaluating the Integration of technology and second language learning", CALICO Journal, 17(2), pp.269~306 (1999)
  3. Adas, D., "Writing difficulties and new solutions : Blended learning as an approach to improve writing abilities", International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(9), pp.254~266 (2013)
  4. Al-Jarf, R. S., "The effects of web-based learning on struggling EFL college writers", Foreign Language Annals, 37(1), pp.46~56 (2004)
  5. Al-Jarf, R. S., "The effects of online grammar instruction on low proficiency EFL college students’ achievement", Asian EFL Journal, 7(4), pp.166~190 (2005)
  6. Al-Jarf, R., "Teaching vocabulary to EFL college students online", Call-EJ Online, 8(2), pp.1~27 (2007)
  7. Allen, G., "Analysis of the effect of networking on computer-assisted collaborative writing in a fifth grade classroom", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(1), pp.65~75 (1995)
  8. AlQahtani, A. A., "Effects of traditional, blended and e-learning on students' achievement in higher education", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), pp.220~234 (2013)
  9. Al-Qahtani, A. A., "The effectiveness of using e-learning, blended learning and traditional learning on students' achievement and attitudes in a course on Islamic culture: An experimental study", doctor, pp.2010
  10. Bailey, K. D., "The effects of learning strategies on student interaction and student satisfaction", doctor, pp.2002
  11. Baş, G., "Effects of CALL method and dyned language programme on students’ achievement levels and attitudes towards the lesson in English classes", International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 6(7), pp.31~44 (2009)
  12. Behjat, F., "Blended learning : A ubiquitous learning environment for reading comprehension", International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(1), pp.97~ (2012)
  13. Bejarano, Y., "The skilled use of interaction strategies : Creating a framework for improved small-group communicative interaction in the language classroom", System, 25(2), pp.203~214 (1997)
  14. Blake, C., "Potential of text‐based internet chats for improving oral fluency in a second language", The Modern Language Journal, 93(2), pp.227~240 (2009)
  15. Blake, R., "Measuring oral proficiency in distance, face-to-face, and blended classrooms", Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), pp.114~127 (2008)
  16. Cahill, D., "Teaching first-year Spanish on-Line", CALICO Journal, 14(2-4), pp.97~114 (1997)
  17. Casteel, C. A., "Effects of chunked reading among learned disabled students: An experimental comparison of computer and traditional chunked passages", Educational Technology Systems, 17(2) (1989)
  18. Chamberlain, A., "A randomized evaluation of the success for all middle school reading program", Middle Grades Research Journal, 2(1), pp.1~21 (2007)
  19. Cheng, H., "Comparison of performance and attitude in traditional and computer conferencing classes", The American Journal of Distance Education, 5(3), pp.51~64 (1991)
  20. Demetriadis, S., "E-lectures for flexible learning: A study on their learning efficiency", Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), pp.147~157 (2007)
  21. Dracopoulos, E., "Second language writing anxiety, computer anxiety, motivation and performance in a classroom versus a web-based environment", master, pp.2012
  22. Farrah, M., "Enhancing the English reading and writing skills of Palestinian English majors by using CALL", Hebron University Research Journal, 5(2), pp.259~282 (2010)
  23. Fuente, M. J., "Is SLA interactionist theory relevant to CALL? A study on the effects of computer-mediated interaction in L2 vocabulary acquisition", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(1), pp.47~81 (2003)
  24. Fujishiro, N., "Effectiveness of blended instruction in class on the skills of oral reading and speaking in English", Educational Technology Research, 32, pp.79~90 (2009)
  25. Gulek, J. C., "Learning with technology: The impact of laptop use on student achievement", The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(2), pp.3~38 (2005)
  26. Heiman, T., "The effects of E-mail messages in a distance learning university on perceived academic and social support, academic satisfaction, and coping", The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(3), pp.237~248 (2008)
  27. Hlas, A. C., "Native and non-native speakers in online and face-to-face discussions: Leveling the playing field", Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 36(4), pp.337~373 (2007)
  28. Hu, P. J., "Technology-assisted learning and learning style: A longitudinal field experiment", IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans, 37(6), pp.1099~1112 (2007)
  29. Kocoglu, Z., "Blended learning : Investigating its potential in an English language teacher training program", Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(7), pp.1124~1134 (2011)
  30. Kost, C. R., "An investigation of the effects of synchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on interlangauge development in beginning learners of German: Accuracy, proficiency, and communication strategies", doctor, pp.2004
  31. Leitner, P., "Learning analytics: Fundaments, applications, and trends", pp.1~23 (2017), Springer
  32. Evaluating the development of scientific knowledge and new forms of reading comprehension during online learning, "Leu, D. J.", North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, 2005, pp.108~127
  33. Liou, H., "Can grammatical CALL help ELF writing instruction?", CALICO Journal, 10(1), pp.23~44 (1992)
  34. Maki, W. S., "Multimedia comprehension skill predicts differential outcomes of web-based and lecture courses", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Applied, 8(2), pp.85~98 (2002)
  35. Masters, J., "The effects of online professional development on fourth grade English language arts teachers’ knowledge and instructional practices", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(3), pp.355~375 (2010)
  36. Mekheimer, M. A., "Assessing aptitude and attitude development : In a translation skills course", CALICO Journal, 29(2), pp.312~340 (2012)
  37. Mioduser, D., "The learning value of computer-based instruction of early reading skills", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, pp.54~63 (2000)
  38. Moore, J., "The journalism writing course : Evaluation of hybrid versus online grammar instruction", Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 70(1), pp.6~25 (2014)
  39. Nicolson, R. I., "Evaluation of a computer-based reading intervention in infant and junior schools", Journal of Research in Reading, 23(2), pp.194~209 (2000)
  40. 오준일, "Exploring the Effects of Tablet PC-Based English Learning", 영어교육, 69(3), pp.151~176 (2014), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
  41. Owston, R. D., "On and off computer writing of eighth grade students experienced in word processing", Computers in the Schools: Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 8(4), pp.67~88 (1991)
  42. Pavonetti, L. M., "What are the lasting effects on the reading habits of middle school students exposed to accelerated reader in elementary grades?", Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46(4), pp.300~311 (2002)
  43. Payne, J. S., "Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development", CALICO Journal, 20(1), pp.7~32 (2002)
  44. Reber, R., "Accessing motivational factors in educational technology: The case of building a web site as a course assignment", British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), pp.93~95 (2005)
  45. Reitsma, P., "Reading practice for beginners: Effects of guided reading, reading-while-listening, and independent reading with computer-based speech feedback", Reading Research Quarterly, 23(2), pp.219~235 (1988)
  46. Rovai, A. P., "Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses", International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2) (2004)
  47. Satar, H., "The effects of synchronous CMC on speaking proficiency and anxiety: Text versus voice chat", The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), pp.595~613 (2008)
  48. Sequeira, C. A., "Synchronous computer mediated communication and second language proficiency", doctor, pp.2009
  49. Shany, M. T., "Assisted reading practice: Effects on performance for poor readers in grades 3 and 4", Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), pp.382~395 (1995)
  50. Szymańska, A., "Reading efficiency in blended learning context", Teaching English with technology, 11(2), pp.29~42 (2011)
  51. Toro, M. A., "The effects of HyperCard authoring on computer-related attitudes and Spanish language acquisition", Computers in Human Behavior, 11(3-4), pp.633~647 (1995)
  52. Uzun, A., "Blending makes the difference: Comparison in blended and traditional instruction on students’ performance and attitudes in computer literacy", Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(3), pp.196~207 (2010)
  53. Van Daal, V. H. P., "Computer-assisted learning to read and spell: Results from two pilot studies", Journal of Research in Reading, 23(2), pp.181~193 (2000)
  54. Vernadakis, N., "A comparison of student satisfaction between traditional and blended technology course offerings in physical education", Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), pp.137~147 (2012)
  55. Vollands, S. R., "Computerized self-assessment of reading comprehension with the accelerated reader: Action research", Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 15(3), pp.197~211 (1999)
  56. Wichadee, S., "Factors related to students’ performance of hybrid learning in an English language course", International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 12(1), pp.74~90 (2014)
  57. Woltering, V., "Blended learning positively affects students’ satisfaction and role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: Results of a mixed-method evaluation", Advances in Health Science Education, 14, pp.725~738 (2009)
  58. Young, D. J., "An empirical investigation of the effects of blended learning on student outcomes in a redesigned intensive Spanish course", CALICO Journal, 26(1), pp.160~181 (2008)
  59. Zhang, S., "Reexamining the effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phones", The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), pp.203~214 (2011)
  60. Zheng, D., "Attitude and self-efficacy change: English language learning in virtual worlds", CALICO Journal, 27(1), pp.205~231 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)