21세기 중국의 남성성 담론 - ‘꽃미남(娘炮)’ 비판에서 ‘돌보는 아버지’의 등장까지
China’s “Masculinity” Discourse in the 21st Century - From Criticism of “Feminine Man” to the Emergence of “Caring Father”
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Chinese society, which has adopted the pursuit-type industrialization model, has been pursuing the “localization” of academic studies and discourse after the 2008 US financial crisis and the hosting of the Beijing Olympics. This study examines how the discussion of masculinity in Chinese society develops under such a background of the times. In China in 2010, the decline in academic ability and physical strength of male students was combined with “gender” and discussed as a “social problem,” gender conflicts in China have been intensifying in educational sites, sports, and state-run discourse. Furthermore, this has developed into a discourse on the national crisis that “when men become feminine, the state becomes feminine,” and disparaging of “femininity” is becoming explicit. However, in daily life, the new generation born in the 1980s and 90s tends to neutralize, with little resistance to “feminine” temperament and no clear boundaries of gender roles in home care. This study understands that this misogyny and Chinese society’s desire for strong masculinity is due to the external conflict that China experienced in the 21st century, that is, the sense of crisis caused by the Sino-US conflict, and considered the education community criticizing “niangpao 娘炮 (feminine man),” the national crisis discourse, and the “straight man” debate showing off masculinity. However, this discourse reveals a considerable gap with the gender perception of the new generation. Therefore, unlike the nationalist discourse that pursues strong masculinity, in reality, it can be said that the dominant and hegemonic masculinity as a governing tool is marginalizing or disappearing day by day.
Abstract
Chinese society, which has adopted the pursuit-type industrialization model, has been pursuing the “localization” of academic studies and discourse after the 2008 US financial crisis and the hosting of the Beijing Olympics. This study examines how the discussion of masculinity in Chinese society develops under such a background of the times. In China in 2010, the decline in academic ability and physical strength of male students was combined with “gender” and discussed as a “social problem,” gender conflicts in China have been intensifying in educational sites, sports, and state-run discourse. Furthermore, this has developed into a discourse on the national crisis that “when men become feminine, the state becomes feminine,” and disparaging of “femininity” is becoming explicit. However, in daily life, the new generation born in the 1980s and 90s tends to neutralize, with little resistance to “feminine” temperament and no clear boundaries of gender roles in home care. This study understands that this misogyny and Chinese society’s desire for strong masculinity is due to the external conflict that China experienced in the 21st century, that is, the sense of crisis caused by the Sino-US conflict, and considered the education community criticizing “niangpao 娘炮 (feminine man),” the national crisis discourse, and the “straight man” debate showing off masculinity. However, this discourse reveals a considerable gap with the gender perception of the new generation. Therefore, unlike the nationalist discourse that pursues strong masculinity, in reality, it can be said that the dominant and hegemonic masculinity as a governing tool is marginalizing or disappearing day by day.
참고문헌 (29)
- 김미란, "중국 개혁개방기 80년대생(80後) 여성의 ‘욕망’ 재현― 장소성과 젠더관점을 중심으로", 중국학논총, (68), pp.217~254 (2020), 중국학연구소[DOI]
- 문현아, "돌보는 남성성의 가능성 모색: 남성의 가족돌봄 사례를 중심으로", 한국여성학, 37(3), pp.33~63 (2021), 한국여성학회[DOI]
- 설혜심, "서구 남성사 연구의 주요 의제들", 젠더와 문화, 10(2), pp.7~44 (2017), 여성학연구소[DOI]
- 중국공산당 제20차 전국대표대회― 중국식 현대화 추진을 위한 시진핑 친정체제 구축, , 성균관대학교 동아시아학술원 성균중국연구소, 1~21 (2022)
- 이응철, "현대 중국의 국가주의, 중국몽(中国梦), 그리고 남성성", 아태연구, 29(3), pp.77~109 (2022), 국제지역연구원[DOI]
- 들, "남성성", pp.2013, 코넬(Connell, Raewyn)
- 韩葳巍, "学校教育场域中“娘炮”男性气质的建构——基于五名男大学生的质性研究", 陕西学前师范学院学报, 37(9), pp.110~119 (2021), 陕西学前师范学院
- 盖琪, "性别气质与审美代沟——从“娘炮羞辱”看当前媒介文化中的“男性焦虑”", 学术研究, (7), pp.151~155 (2019), 广东省社会科学界联合会
- 马冬玲, "家务劳动与男性气质的建构——基于六省市城乡居民的定性调查", 中华女子学院学报, (5), pp.42~50 (2019), 中华女子学院
- 王亮, "“新父职”研究:概念厘清、理论脉络与研究展望", 中国青年研究, pp.111~118 (2022), 中国青少年研究中心
- 宋少鹏, "“回家”还是“被回家”?——市场化过程中“妇女回家”讨论与中国社会意识形态转型", 妇女研究论丛, (4)통권 : 106, pp.5~26 (2011), 中国妇女研究会
- 沈奕斐, "男孩危机折射性别教育困境", SHANGHAI EDUCATION, pp.39~ (2021)
- 刘爱玉, "双薪家庭的家务性别分工:经济依赖、性别观念或情感表达", 社會, 35, pp.109~136 (2015), 上海大学
- 赵霞, "拯救男孩" (2010), 作家出版社
- 李银河, "我的社会观察" (2014), 中华工商联合出版社
- 王向贤, "为父之道:父职的社会构建" (2019), 天津人民出版社
- "『中华人民共和国人口与计划生育法』 第十八条", ~
- "专访阎云翔:家庭作为私人生活的避风港,可能是暂时现象" (2022)[URL]
- "爸爸去哪儿"[URL]
- "“央视严禁“娘炮”文化,个人审美有错吗?应该如何定义“娘炮”?”" (2021)[URL]
- "辛识平,““娘炮”之风当休矣" (2018)[URL]
- "什么是今天该有的“男性气质”" (2018)[URL]
- "虎扑这是坐稳直男第一论坛宝座" (2021)[URL]
- "时隔两年整,我又被下个女友绿了"[URL]
- "税前街薪是什么意思?"[URL]
- "少年强则国强 原文"[URL]
- "直男"[URL]
- "2022开学第一课"[URL]
- "蔡徐坤明明很帅,大家为什么一直黑他"[URL]
