Comparative analysis of AGPase proteins and conserved domains in sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) and its two wild relatives
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Conserved domains are defined as recurring units in molecular evolution and are commonly used to interpret the molecular function and biochemical structure of proteins. Herein, the ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase) amino acid sequences of three species of the Ipomoea genus [Ipomoea trifida, I. triloba, and I. batatas (L.) Lam. (sweetpotato)] were identified to investigate their physicochemical and biochemical characteristics. The molecular weight, isoelectric point, instability index, and grand average of hyropathy markedly differed among the three species. The aliphatic index values of sweetpotato AGPase proteins were higher in the small subunit than in the large subunit. The AGPase proteins from sweetpotato were found to contain an LbH_G1P_AT_C domain in the C-terminal region and various domains (NTP_transferase, ADP_Glucose_PP, or Glyco_tranf_GTA) in the N-terminal region. Conversely, most of its two relatives (I. trifida and I. triloba) were found to only contain the NTP_transferase domain in the N-terminal region. These findings suggested that these conserved domains were species-specific and related to the subunit types of AGPase proteins. The study may enable research on the AGPase-related specific characteristics of sweetpotatoes that do not exist in the other two species, such as starch metabolism and tuberization mechanism.
Abstract
Conserved domains are defined as recurring units in molecular evolution and are commonly used to interpret the molecular function and biochemical structure of proteins. Herein, the ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase) amino acid sequences of three species of the Ipomoea genus [Ipomoea trifida, I. triloba, and I. batatas (L.) Lam. (sweetpotato)] were identified to investigate their physicochemical and biochemical characteristics. The molecular weight, isoelectric point, instability index, and grand average of hyropathy markedly differed among the three species. The aliphatic index values of sweetpotato AGPase proteins were higher in the small subunit than in the large subunit. The AGPase proteins from sweetpotato were found to contain an LbH_G1P_AT_C domain in the C-terminal region and various domains (NTP_transferase, ADP_Glucose_PP, or Glyco_tranf_GTA) in the N-terminal region. Conversely, most of its two relatives (I. trifida and I. triloba) were found to only contain the NTP_transferase domain in the N-terminal region. These findings suggested that these conserved domains were species-specific and related to the subunit types of AGPase proteins. The study may enable research on the AGPase-related specific characteristics of sweetpotatoes that do not exist in the other two species, such as starch metabolism and tuberization mechanism.
참고문헌 (23)
- Ballicora MA, "ADP-glucose pyrophos phorylase, a regulatory enzyme for bacterial glycogen synthesis", Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 67(2), pp.213~225 (2004)[DOI]
- Björklund ÅK, "Domain Rearrangements in Protein Evolution", J Mol Biol, 353(4), pp.911~923 (2005)[DOI]
- Crevillén P, "The different large subunit isoforms of Arabidopsis thaliana ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase confer distinct kinetic and regulatory properties to the heterotetrameric enzyme", J Biol Chem, 278(31), pp.28508~28515 (2003)[DOI]
- Forslund K, "Domain architecture conservation in orthologs", BMC Bioinformatics, 12, pp.326~ (2011)[DOI]
- Gasteiger E, "The proteomics protocols handbook", pp.571~607 (2005), Humana Press
- Guerois R, "Protein design based on folding models", Curr Opin Struct Biol, 11, pp.101~106 (2001)[DOI]
- Ingolfsson H, "Protein domain prediction", Methods Mol Biol, 426, pp.117~143 (2008)[DOI]
- Kumar S, "MEGA X : Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms", Mol Biol Evol, 35, pp.1547~1549 (2018)[DOI]
- Lee SS, "Isolation and characterization of polymorphic cDNAs partially encoding ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase(AGPase)large subunit from sweet potato", Mol Cells, 10(1), pp.108~112 (2000)[DOI]
- Li BQ, "Prediction of protein domain with mRMR feature selection and analysis", PLOS ONE, 7(6), pp.e39308~ (2012)[DOI]
- Li L, "Characterization of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase from a starch-deficient mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana(L)", Carbohydr Res, 227, pp.227~239 (1992)[DOI]
- Marchler-Bauer A, "CDD: conserved domains and protein three-dimensional structure", Nucleic Acids Res, 41(D1), pp.D348~D352 (2012)[DOI]
- Ren J, "DOG 1.0:illustrator of protein domain structures", Cell Res, 19(2), pp.271~273 (2009)[DOI]
- Roullier C, "Disentangling the origins of cultivated sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.)", PLOS ONE, 8(5), pp.e62707~ (2013)[DOI]
- Saitou N, "The neighbor-joining method : a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees", Mol Biol Evol, 4(4), pp.406~425 (1987)[DOI]
- "Genes & Genomics", 2015, 595~605, pp.한국유전학회, 10.1007[DOI]
- Smith-White BJ, "Comparison of proteins of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase from diverse sources", J Mol Evol, 34(5), pp.449~464 (1992)[DOI]
- Tsubone M, "Enhancement of tuberous root production and Adenosine 5’‐Diphosphate Pyrophosphorylase (AGPase) activity in sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas Lam.) by exogenous injection of sucrose solution", J Agro Crop Sci, 184(3), pp.181~186 (2000)[DOI]
- Wang W, "Comprehensive analysis of the Gossypium hirsutum L. respiratory burst oxidase homolog (Ghrboh) gene family", BMC Genomics, 21, pp.91~ (2020)[DOI]
- Welbaum GE, "Vegetable production and practices" (2015), CAB International
- Wu S, "Genome sequences of two diploid wild relatives of cultivated sweetpotato reveal targets for genetic improvement", Nat Commun, 9, pp.4580~ (2018)[DOI]
- Yatomi M, "Evaluation of root sink ability of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas Lam.) cultivars on the basis of enzymatic activity in the starch synthesis pathway", J Agro Crop Sci, 177(1), pp.17~23 (1996)[DOI]
- Zhou Y, "Isolation and characterization of cDNAs and genomic DNAs encoding ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase large and small subunits from sweetpotato", Mol Genet Genomics, 291(2), pp.609~620 (2016)[DOI]