본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

L2 Learners’ and Professionals’ Perceptions of Cognitive Task Complexity: Towards Developing an Index of Task Difficulty

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper attempts to broaden our understanding on how cognitive task complexity (TC) contributes to L2 learners’ and language professionals’ perceptions of task difficulty (TD). This study was conducted to allow a deeper investigation of the extent to which manipulating TC can influence perceptions of TD, what TC-factors contribute to perceptions of TD, and whether there is a perceptual match between L2 learners and language professionals. The study employed a mixed-method design in which 68 students and 26 language professionals evaluated the TD of two video-based narrative tasks. The students, who were L2 learners of English at a Jordanian secondary school, performed two tasks with increased TC manipulated by intentional reasoning (IR) demands. Data on learners’ perceptions of TD were collected qualitatively and quantitatively using a retrospective questionnaire. The language professionals, who were researchers with a TESOL background, read the tasks instructions and watched the two clips before deciding which task would be considered more difficult and why. Results showed a match between learners and language professionals on their perceptions of TD. Both groups rated the more complex task (+IR) as more difficult. Two categories of higher cognitive demands imposed by IR requirement, i.e. task-induced and task-inherent, were found to be the major contributors to the perceptions of TD. The findings have significant implications for the development of an index of TD, which is considered a priority for language teaching, testing and syllabus design.

Abstract

This paper attempts to broaden our understanding on how cognitive task complexity (TC) contributes to L2 learners’ and language professionals’ perceptions of task difficulty (TD). This study was conducted to allow a deeper investigation of the extent to which manipulating TC can influence perceptions of TD, what TC-factors contribute to perceptions of TD, and whether there is a perceptual match between L2 learners and language professionals. The study employed a mixed-method design in which 68 students and 26 language professionals evaluated the TD of two video-based narrative tasks. The students, who were L2 learners of English at a Jordanian secondary school, performed two tasks with increased TC manipulated by intentional reasoning (IR) demands. Data on learners’ perceptions of TD were collected qualitatively and quantitatively using a retrospective questionnaire. The language professionals, who were researchers with a TESOL background, read the tasks instructions and watched the two clips before deciding which task would be considered more difficult and why. Results showed a match between learners and language professionals on their perceptions of TD. Both groups rated the more complex task (+IR) as more difficult. Two categories of higher cognitive demands imposed by IR requirement, i.e. task-induced and task-inherent, were found to be the major contributors to the perceptions of TD. The findings have significant implications for the development of an index of TD, which is considered a priority for language teaching, testing and syllabus design.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Allan, D., "Oxford Placement Test. University of Cambridge Local Examination Syndicate" (2004), Oxford University Press
  2. Awwad, A., ""I think that's what he's doing" : Effects of intentional reasoning on second language(L2)speech performance", System, 67, pp.158~169 (2017)
  3. Anas Awwad, "Task complexity, language proficiency and working memory: Interaction effects on second language speech performance", International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 0(0) (2019), Walter de Gruyter GmbH[DOI]
  4. Barkhuizen, G., "Discovering learners' perceptions of ESL classroom teaching", learning activities in a South African context, 1998, pp.32, 85~108
  5. "Pat & Mat, Czech stop-motion animated series" (1976)[URL]
  6. Breen, M., "Language learning tasks", pp.23~46 (1987), Prentice Hall
  7. Brindley, G., "Guidelines for the development of curriculum resources", pp.45~56 (1987), National Curriculum Resource Centre
  8. Bulté, B., "Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA Vol. 32", pp.21~46 (2012), John Benjamins
  9. Campbell, D. J., "Task complexity : A review and analysis", Academy of management review, 13(1), pp.40~52 (1988)
  10. Candlin, C., "Language learning tasks", pp.5~22 (1987), Prentice Hall
  11. Cohen, J., "Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences" (2013), Academic Press
  12. Creswell, J. W., "A concise introduction to mixed methods research" (2015), Sage Publications
  13. De Jong, N., "Similar prompts may not be similar in the performance they elicit : Examining fluency, complexity, accuracy, and lexis in narratives from five picture prompts", Language Teaching Research, 20(3), pp.387~404 (2016)
  14. Dörnyei, Z., "Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies" (2007), Oxford University Press
  15. Hawkey, R., "Teacher and learner perceptions of language learning activity", ELT journal, 60, pp.242~252 (2006)
  16. Ishikawa, T., "The effect of task complexity and language proficiency on task-based language performance", The Journal of Asia TEFL, 3(4), pp.193~225 (2006)
  17. Ishikawa, T., "The effect of task demands of intentional reasoning on L2 speech performance", The Journal of Asia TEFL, 5(1), pp.29~63 (2008)
  18. Ishikawa, T., "Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance", pp.307~330 (2011), John Benjamins
  19. Kumaravadivelu, B., "Language-learning tasks : Teacher intention and learner interpretation", ELT journal, 45, pp.98~107 (1991)
  20. Kumaravadivelu, B., "TESOL methods : Changing tracks, challenging trends", TESOL Quarterly, 40, pp.59~81 (2006)
  21. Liu, P., "Task complexity : A review and conceptualization framework", International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42, pp.553~568 (2012)
  22. Nunan, D., "Designing tasks for the communicative classroom" (1989), Cambridge University Press
  23. Plonsky, L., "How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research", Language Learning, 64(4), pp.878~912 (2014)
  24. Révész, A., "Teachers’ perspectives on second language task difficulty : Insights from think-alouds and eye tracking", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, pp.182~204 (2016)
  25. Révész, A., "Measuring cognitive task demands using dual-task methodology, subjective self-ratings, and expert judgements : A validation study", Studies in second language acquisition, 38(4), pp.703~737 (2016)
  26. Robinson, P., "Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production : Exploring interactions in a componential framework", Applied Linguistics, 22(1), pp.27~57 (2001)
  27. Robinson, P., "Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning : Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty", IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(3), pp.193~213 (2007)
  28. Robinson, P., "Second language task complexity : Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance(Vol. 2)" (2011), John Benjamins Publishing
  29. Robinson, P., "Domains and directions in the development of TBLT Vol. 8", pp.87~121 (2015), John Benjamins
  30. Robinson, P., "Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis and second language learning and performance", IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, pp.161~176 (2007)
  31. Sasayama, S., "Is a ‘complex’task really complex? Validating the assumption of cognitive task complexity", The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), pp.231~254 (2016)
  32. Simin Sattarpour, "Exploring the Interplay of Planning Time, Reasoning Demands, and Language Learning Aptitude in Iranian EFL Learners’ Written Production", Journal of Asia TEFL, 14(4), pp.736~754 (2018), 아시아테플
  33. Skehan, P., "A cognitive approach to language learning" (1998), Oxford University Press
  34. Skehan, P., "Processing perspectives on task performance Vol. 5", pp.1~26 (2014), John Benjamins
  35. Skehan, P., "Domains and directions in the development of TBLT Vol. 8", pp.123~155 (2015), John Benjamins Publishing
  36. Tavakoli, P., "Investigating task difficulty : Learners’ and teachers’ perceptions", International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(1), pp.1~25 (2009)
  37. Tavakoli, P., "Issues in second language proficiency", pp.216~232 (2009), Continuum
  38. Tavakoli, P., "Task design and second language performance : The effect of narrative type on learner output", Language Learning, 58, pp.439~473 (2008)
  39. Tavakoli, P., "Planning and task performance in a second language Vol. 11", pp.239~273 (2005), John Benjamins

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)