본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Interaction of Cognitive Task Complexity and Motivational Orientation in L2 Writing

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Within the active area of task complexity research, a key objective has been to investigate the effects of inherent cognitive demands of tasks on L2 performance and development. The present study investigated the extent to which cognitive writing task complexity influences linguistic performance of writing, and examined how motivational orientation defined by regulatory focus would mediate the effects of task complexity. Sixty-two Korean EFL learners were asked to perform two writing tasks with different levels of complexity. Learners’ regulatory foci were measured, and linguistic performances were assessed in terms of syntactic complexity, lexical complexity, and accuracy. ANOVA results revealed significant main effects of task complexity on all indices of lexical complexity and the two measures of syntactic complexity (T-units per sentence and verb phrases per T-unit). Importantly, there were significant interaction effects between writing task complexity and regulatory focus on syntactic complexity and accuracy. The promotion-focused learners performed better regarding both syntactic and lexical complexity in the complex task than the simple task, while the prevention-focused learners showed decreased accuracy and syntactic complexity with increasing lexical complexity. The findings provide important insights into factors mediating the effect of task complexity on linguistic performance, suggesting that the consideration of regulatory focus is crucial to ensure the effectiveness of L2 writing tasks.

Abstract

Within the active area of task complexity research, a key objective has been to investigate the effects of inherent cognitive demands of tasks on L2 performance and development. The present study investigated the extent to which cognitive writing task complexity influences linguistic performance of writing, and examined how motivational orientation defined by regulatory focus would mediate the effects of task complexity. Sixty-two Korean EFL learners were asked to perform two writing tasks with different levels of complexity. Learners’ regulatory foci were measured, and linguistic performances were assessed in terms of syntactic complexity, lexical complexity, and accuracy. ANOVA results revealed significant main effects of task complexity on all indices of lexical complexity and the two measures of syntactic complexity (T-units per sentence and verb phrases per T-unit). Importantly, there were significant interaction effects between writing task complexity and regulatory focus on syntactic complexity and accuracy. The promotion-focused learners performed better regarding both syntactic and lexical complexity in the complex task than the simple task, while the prevention-focused learners showed decreased accuracy and syntactic complexity with increasing lexical complexity. The findings provide important insights into factors mediating the effect of task complexity on linguistic performance, suggesting that the consideration of regulatory focus is crucial to ensure the effectiveness of L2 writing tasks.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. Ai, H., "A web-based system for automatic measurement of lexical complexity", Paper presented at the 27th Annual Symposium of the Computer-Assisted Language Consortium (2010)
  2. Brown, G., "Language and understanding" (1994), Oxford University Press
  3. Cho, M., "Task complexity, modality, and working memory in L2 task performance", System, 72, pp.85~98 (2018)[DOI]
  4. Crowe, E., "Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations : Promotion and prevention in decision-making", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), pp.117~132 (1997)[DOI]
  5. Ellis, R., "Task-based language learning and teaching" (2003), Oxford University Press
  6. Frear, M. W., "The effects of cognitive task complexity on writing complexity", Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, pp.45~57 (2015)[DOI]
  7. Grimm, L. R., "Differential effects of regulatory fit on category learning", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), pp.920~927 (2008)[DOI]
  8. Han, Y., "Korean L2 speakers’ regulatory focus and oral task performance", International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 56(2), pp.181~203 (2018)[DOI]
  9. Haws, K. L., "An assessment of chronic regulatory focus measures", Journal of Marketing Research, 47(5), pp.967~982 (2010)[DOI]
  10. Hayes, J. R., "The science of writing:Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications", pp.1~27 (1996), Routledge
  11. Hayes, J. R., "Perspectives on writing: Research, theory, and practice", pp.6~44 (2000), Taylor & Francis
  12. Higgins, E. T., "Beyond pleasure and pain", American Psychologist, 52(12), pp.1280~1300 (1997)[DOI]
  13. Johnson, M. D., "Cognitive task complexity and L2 written syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency : A research synthesis and meta-analysis", Journal of Second Language Writing, 37, pp.13~38 (2017)[DOI]
  14. Kellogg, R. T., "The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications", pp.57~71 (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  15. Kim, Y., "The intersection of task-based interaction, task complexity, and working memory : L2 question development through recasts in a laboratory setting", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(3), pp.549~581 (2015)[DOI]
  16. Kormos, J., "Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance", Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), pp.148~161 (2011)[DOI]
  17. Kuiken, F., "Investigating tasks in formal language learning", pp.117~135 (2007), Multilingual Matters
  18. Kuiken, F., "Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language", Journal of second language writing, 17(1), pp.48~60 (2008)[DOI]
  19. Kuiken, F., "Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance", pp.91~104 (2011), John Benjamins
  20. Lee, J., "Task complexity, cognitive load, and L1 speech", Applied linguistics, 40(3), pp.506~539 (2019)[DOI]
  21. Lee, J., "Task closure and task complexity effects on L2 written performance", Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, pp.1~13 (2020)[DOI]
  22. Lu, X., "Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), pp.474~496 (2010)[DOI]
  23. Masrom, U. K., "The role of task complexity and task motivation in language production", GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 15(2), pp.33~49 (2015)[DOI]
  24. Michel, M. C., "Second language task complexity:Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance", pp.141~173 (2011), John Benjamins
  25. Ong, J., "How do planning time and task conditions affect metacognitive processes of L2 writers?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 23(1), pp.17~30 (2014)[DOI]
  26. Ong, J., "Effects of the manipulation of cognitive processes on EFL writers' text quality", TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), pp.375~398 (2013)[DOI]
  27. Papi, M., "Motivation as quality : Regulatory fit effects on incidental vocabulary learning", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(4), pp.1~24 (2018)[DOI]
  28. Papi, M., "Rethinking L2motivation research : The 2× 2 model of L2 self-guides", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), pp.1~25 (2019)[DOI]
  29. Papi, M., "Motivational mechanisms underlying second language achievement : A regulatory focus perspective", Language Learning, 71(2), pp.537~572 (2021)[DOI]
  30. Polio, C., "The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate", Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), pp.375~389 (2012)[DOI]
  31. Rahimi, M., "Effects of task complexity and planning conditions on L2 argumentative writing production", Discourse Processes, 55(8), pp.726~742 (2018)[DOI]
  32. Rahimi, M., "Writing task complexity, students’motivational beliefs, anxiety and their writing production in English as a second language", Reading and Writing, 32(3), pp.761~786 (2019)[DOI]
  33. Révész, A., "Task complexity, focus on L2 constructions, and individual differences: A classroom based study", The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), pp.162~181 (2011)[DOI]
  34. Révész, A., "Measuring cognitive task demands using dual-task methodology, subjective self-ratings, and expert judgments : A validation study", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(4), pp.703~737 (2016)[DOI]
  35. Robinson, P., "Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production : Exploring interactions in a componential framework", Applied Linguistics, 22(1), pp.27~57 (2001)[DOI]
  36. Robinson, P., "Cognitive complexity and task sequencing : Studies in a componential framework for second language task design", International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, pp.1~32 (2005)[DOI]
  37. Ruiz-Funes, M., "Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing", pp.163~192 (2014), John Benjamins
  38. Ruiz-Funes, M., "Exploring the potential of second", foreign language writing for language learning : The effects of task factors and learner variables, 2015, pp.28, 1~19
  39. Sasayama, S., "Is a ‘complex’ task really complex? Validating the assumption of cognitive task complexity", The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), pp.231~254 (2016)[DOI]
  40. Sasayama, S., "Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts. Research and implementation", pp.23~42 (2012), John Benjamins Publishing
  41. Scholer, A. A., "When risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity", Journal of personality and social psychology, 99(2), pp.215~231 (2010)[DOI]
  42. Skehan, P., "A cognitive approach to language learning" (1998), Oxford University Press
  43. Skehan, P., "The influence of task structure processing conditions on narrative retellings", Language Learning, 49(1), pp.93~120 (1999)[DOI]
  44. Skehan, P., "Cognition and second language instruction", pp.183~205 (2001), Cambridge University Press
  45. Spiegel, S., "How regulatory fit enhances motivational strength during goal pursuit", European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(1), pp.39~54 (2004)[DOI]
  46. Teimouri, Y., "L2 selves, emotions, and motivated behaviors", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(4), pp.681~709 (2017)[DOI]
  47. Van-Dijk, D., "Task type as a moderator of positive", negative feedback effects on motivation and performance : A regulatory focus perspective, 2011, pp.32(8), 1084~1105
  48. Williams, J., "The potential role(s)of writing in second language development", Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), pp.321~331 (2012)[DOI]
  49. 원용국, "The Effect of Task Complexity on Test-takers’ Performance in a Performance-based L2 Oral Communication Test for International Teaching Assistants", 영어교과교육, 19(1), pp.27~52 (2020), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
  50. 윤경옥, "쓰기 장르가 EFL 학습자들의 영어 쓰기 수행에 미치는 영향", 영어교과교육, 13(2), pp.133~152 (2014), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)