본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

가사조정제도의 문제점과 과제

Problems with and Tasks of the Family Mediation System

0

조회

0

다운로드

15

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Family disputes involve multilateral aspects of interests and emotional conflicts beyond simple and single-issue interest conflicts. Their usual patterns are complicated networks of those elements. Most of solutions for family disputes are characterized not only by termination of conflicting relations of the past but also formation of new interpersonal relations. This study presents a review of the family mediation system in their problems and improvement measures as a tool to substitute a trial or alternative dispute resolution(ADR) in a domestic litigation. A domestic litigation should allow the concerned parties to participate in the procedures as easily and cheaply as possible and provide them with enough chances to reach a solution quickly by using counseling, mediation, and negotiation rather than by resorting to a legal suit. Despite the rapid increase to the number of such a case, a family court only operates in Seoul, which means that it fails to fulfill its functions as a special court. The long-term solution to the problem would be to set up a family court across the nation. For a short-term solution, one should be established at least within the jurisdiction of a high court(in Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Gwangju, Daejeon) and Suwon, Incheon to meet the urgent needs. It’s also worth considering to create a window devoted to mediation, expand the oral applications, simplify the application form and accompanying documents, and revise the existing system’s defects later. But what’s most needed to improve the current family mediation system is its better operation rather than more legal regulations. Thus a family court is to make more efforts to resolve family dispute more peacefully and ultimately via ADR to replace a trial.

Abstract

Family disputes involve multilateral aspects of interests and emotional conflicts beyond simple and single-issue interest conflicts. Their usual patterns are complicated networks of those elements. Most of solutions for family disputes are characterized not only by termination of conflicting relations of the past but also formation of new interpersonal relations. This study presents a review of the family mediation system in their problems and improvement measures as a tool to substitute a trial or alternative dispute resolution(ADR) in a domestic litigation. A domestic litigation should allow the concerned parties to participate in the procedures as easily and cheaply as possible and provide them with enough chances to reach a solution quickly by using counseling, mediation, and negotiation rather than by resorting to a legal suit. Despite the rapid increase to the number of such a case, a family court only operates in Seoul, which means that it fails to fulfill its functions as a special court. The long-term solution to the problem would be to set up a family court across the nation. For a short-term solution, one should be established at least within the jurisdiction of a high court(in Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Gwangju, Daejeon) and Suwon, Incheon to meet the urgent needs. It’s also worth considering to create a window devoted to mediation, expand the oral applications, simplify the application form and accompanying documents, and revise the existing system’s defects later. But what’s most needed to improve the current family mediation system is its better operation rather than more legal regulations. Thus a family court is to make more efforts to resolve family dispute more peacefully and ultimately via ADR to replace a trial.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. "가정법원의 장기적 발전방안-인적물적 구성을 중심으로" (2005)
  2. "친족상속법-가족법" (2002), 법문사
  3. "가사소년제도개혁위원회 자료집(Ⅳ)" (2005), 서울가정법원 가사소년제도개혁위원회
  4. "現代家事調停マニュアル" (2000), 一粒社
  5. "가사소송법 제17조의 연혁과 문제점", (29) (2004), 한국법사학회
  6. "“가사조정사항을 논함 사법연구자료」", 16 (1989), 법원행정처
  7. "“가사심판제도에 관한 현행법상 문제점-가사심판법의 개정에 즈음하여-" (1990)
  8. "가사조정현황과 문제점 그리고 개선방안" (1997), 서울가정법원 조정위원회
  9. "가사조정실무", (5) (2002), 서울가정법원 조정위원회
  10. "가사소송에서의 처분권주의의 제한에 대한 재검토" (2000), 한국민사소송법학회
  11. "가사조정절차의 특색과 절차보장", (9) (1995), 한국가족법학회
  12. "일본 신인사소송법의기본구조와 절차적 특징" (2004)
  13. "가정법원의 조직과 제도", (14) (1994)
  14. "인권과 정의」" (1991)
  15. "“가사심판의 특이성-특히 민사소송의 원리와 대비하여- 법학의 제문제」" (1969), 경희대학교 출판국
  16. "가정법원 조정위원회의 역할-정신분석학적 처방", (5) (2002), 서울가정법원 조정위원회
  17. "가사조정의 활성화 방안" (1995), 서울가정법원
  18. "증거방법으로서의 조사보고서" (1995), 서울가정법원
  19. "본인출석주의와 당사자의 필요적 소환", pp.16~ (1995), 서울가정법원
  20. "“새 가사소송법의 개설" (1991), 박영사
  21. "가정법원사건의 제문제」", 재판자료 18 (1983), 법원행정처
  22. "인권과 정의」" (1994)
  23. "“가사심판법의 조정 화해와 신분행위" (1964)
  24. "“가사조정에 있어서의 조정에 갈음하는 결정 가정법원사건의 제문제」", 재판자료 62 서울가정법원설립 30주년 특, 법원행정처 1993
  25. "“우리의 가사조정운용의 문제점 인식을 위한 일고-이혼사건을 중심으로", (199110)
  26. "“가사조정전치주의의 이론과 실제 ” 민사실무연구회편 민사재판의 제문제 8권」" (1994), 한국사법행정학회
  27. "가사조정의 실태와 활성화 방안" (2000), 대구대학교 대학원
  28. "人事訴訟法の基本構造", (1259) (2003), 有斐閣
  29. "の方向と問題點-臨時調停制度審議會の答申を機緣" (1974)
  30. "調停前置主義と訴訟事件-新人事訴訟法の制定を契機として-", (1143) (2004)
  31. "“家事調停の展望", 小山昇著作集 8 (1992)
  32. "家族法と戶籍-その現在及び將來-」" (1986)
  33. "裁判外紛爭解決制度と辯護士法", (942) (1997)
  34. "가정법원의 현황과 발전방향-전국에 가정법원 설치를 촉구하며", (14) (2000), 한국가족법학회
  35. "가사조정의 대상과 범위" (1995), 서울가정법원

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)