기업과 영업 - ‘기업’과 ‘영업’에 대한 이해방식에 관한 시론적 고찰 -
Enterprise and Business
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The question of terminology is supposed to play an important role in the academic world. For this world is composed of many terms and their diverse concepts. Therefore scholars are very often compelled to face the difficult works of defining terms used by them. The Legal scholars in charge of commercial law field can not be exceptions, so they are burdened at least with such works of defining two important basic terms: ‘enterprise’ and ‘business’. These are the most important terms in the commercial law field, as the expression commercial law as enterprise law clearly shows. The term ‘enterprise’ decides on the area of the commercial law and the term ‘business’ actually decides on the area, to which the Korean Commercial Code should be applied. Therefore those terms play crucial roles in the identification of commercial law and the application of the Korean Commercial Code respectively. This question of identification is related with the academic fields of economics and business administration as the background of the commercial law, because the term ‘enterprise’ originates from these background fields. This article is designed to clarify the concepts of 'business' and 'enterprise' in the commercial law field and neighbouring fields like civil law, constitutional law and those background fields, in order to eventually get some help from them. According to the understanding of commercial law academics, the two terms share some conceptual elements like pursuing self-interest, continuity, organization or economic unit, even though they themselves are not qualified as legal entities. However, the concept of enterprise in economics and business administration fields is larger than that in the commercial law field.
Abstract
The question of terminology is supposed to play an important role in the academic world. For this world is composed of many terms and their diverse concepts. Therefore scholars are very often compelled to face the difficult works of defining terms used by them. The Legal scholars in charge of commercial law field can not be exceptions, so they are burdened at least with such works of defining two important basic terms: ‘enterprise’ and ‘business’. These are the most important terms in the commercial law field, as the expression commercial law as enterprise law clearly shows. The term ‘enterprise’ decides on the area of the commercial law and the term ‘business’ actually decides on the area, to which the Korean Commercial Code should be applied. Therefore those terms play crucial roles in the identification of commercial law and the application of the Korean Commercial Code respectively. This question of identification is related with the academic fields of economics and business administration as the background of the commercial law, because the term ‘enterprise’ originates from these background fields. This article is designed to clarify the concepts of 'business' and 'enterprise' in the commercial law field and neighbouring fields like civil law, constitutional law and those background fields, in order to eventually get some help from them. According to the understanding of commercial law academics, the two terms share some conceptual elements like pursuing self-interest, continuity, organization or economic unit, even though they themselves are not qualified as legal entities. However, the concept of enterprise in economics and business administration fields is larger than that in the commercial law field.
참고문헌 (60)
- 고준환, "기업법의 체계화를 위한 기업개념 고찰, 인산정희철선생정년기념논문집, 상법논총", 33~ (1985)
- 권오승, "경제법" (2005), 법문사
- 김경태, "勞動法上 ‘事業讓渡’의 槪念", 비교사법, 14(2)통권 : 37, pp.481~ (2007)
- 김성태, "상법총칙ㆍ상행위법강론" (1998), 법문사
- 김준호, "민법강의" (2003), 법문사
- 김지형, "양업양도와 근로관계의 승계", 민사재판의 제문제, 8, pp.1034~ (1994), 민사실무연구회
- 김철수, "헌법학신론" (2006), 박영사
- 김헌무, "영업양도의 요건", 상사판례연구, 9, pp.148~ (1998), 한국상사판례연구회
- 김형배, "영업양도와 근로관계의 승계", pp.48~52 (1999), 신조사
- 박길준, "상법요론" (1999), 삼영사
- 손주찬, "상법의 기초개념으로서의 기업의 개념과 경제법, 법조", 34~ (1959)
- 손주찬, "상법(상)" (2003), 박영사
- 송현호, "신제도이론" (1998), 대우학술총서 인문사회과학
- 신석훈, "회사모델론에 관한 소고", 경제법 연구, 5(1), pp.161~ (2006)
- 신석훈, "회사지배구조모델의 법경제학적 접근 -계약주의 회사모델을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2006
- 기업정리제도와 근로관계, 기업의 구조조정과 노동법적 과제, "신유철", 한국노동연구원, 349~ (1998)
- 안강현, "상법총칙ㆍ상행위법" (2008), 박영사
- 안동섭, "상법을 기업법 내용으로 개편하자", 법률신문 1961호(1990.8.23.), 3~ (1990)
- 양삼승, "민법주해(Ⅰ)"
- 유진희, "기업의 개념(상)", pp.84~ (1992), 사업행정
- 유진희, "기업의 개념(하)", pp.73~ (1992), 사업행정
- 이기수, "상법은 기업법인가?", 서정갑박사고희기념논문집, 19~ (1986)
- 이기수, "상법총칙ㆍ상행위법" (2008), 박영사
- 이범찬, "상법(상)" (2008), 삼영사
- 이승욱, "사업영도와 근로자의 지위", 박사, pp.1997
- 이철송, "상법총칙ㆍ상행위" (1999), 박영사
- 임완규, "영업양도와 납세의무의 승계", 사법논집, 11, pp.567~ (1980), 법원행정처
- 임종률, "사업주변경과 근로자의 법적 지위", 민법학논총(곽윤직교수화갑기념논문집, 박영사, 1985), 536~
- 임중호, "서독에서의 기업법 이론의 발전배경에 관한 소고", 중앙대 법정논총, 27, pp.21~ (1987)
- 임중호, "독일에서의 기업법이론", 법률신문 제1782호(1988.9.15), 10~ (1988)
- 임창희, "경영학 원론" (2006), 학현사
- 임홍근, "상법총칙" (1986), 법문사
- 임홍근, "영업과 기업, 해암이범찬교수화갑기념논문집 상사법의 기본문제", 19~ (1993)
- 정동윤, "상법총칙ㆍ상행위법강론" (1998), 법문사
- 정동윤, "상법(상)" (2003), 법문사
- 정병덕, "영업양도에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2000
- 정호열, "경제법" (2008), 박영사
- 정찬형, "상법학상의 기업개념, 기업법의 행방, 1991, 제237면 이하 (정찬형 저, 백산상사법논집, 백산정찬형교수화갑기념논문집, 2008, 제3면 이하)", ~
- 정희철, "기업개념의 상법적 의의", 법학(서울대), 3(2), pp.225~
- 조동성, "21세기를 위한 경영학" (2000), 서울경제경영
- Stober, Rolf, "Verwaltungswirtschaftsrecht(경제행정법)" (1996), Aufl.
- 허영, "한국헌법론" (2007), 박영사
- 홍복기, "상법개설" (2005), 법문사
- Albach,Horst, "Albach", Das Unternehmen als Institution, 19
- Ballerstedt, Kurt, "Was ist Unternehmensrecht?, FS Konrad Duden zum 70. GT", ~ (1977)
- Bundesministerium der Justiz, "Bericht, ueber die Verhandlungen der젨젨 Unternehmensrechtskommission", ~ (1980)
- Canaris, "Claus-Wilhelm, Handelsrecht, 23. Aufl.", ~ (2000)
- Hattenhauer, Hans, "Hans, Grundbegriffe des Buergerlichen Rechts, 2. Aufl.", ~ (2000)
- Hellriegel, Don, "Management" (1999)
- Hueck, Goetz, "Gesellschaftsrercht, 20. Aufl.", ~ (2003)
- Koller, "HGB-Kommentar", HGB-Kommentar, 4. Aufl., ~ (2003)
- Nobel, "Anstalt und Unternehmen", ~ (1978)
- Raisch, Peter, "Unternehmensrecht I u. Ⅱ", ~ (1973)
- Raiser, Thomas, "Unternehmen als Organisation", ~ (1969)
- Raiser, Thomas, "Die Zukunft des Unternehmensrecht, in: Lutter, Marcus(Hrsg.), FS Fischer", 561~ (1979)
- Raiser, Thomas, "25 Jahre Unternehmensrecht in Deutschland, in: Leser, Hans G.(Hrsg.), FS fuer Hyung-Bae Kim", 166~ (1995)
- Raiser, Thomas, "der Kapitalgesellschaften, 3. Aufl.", ~ (2001)
- Salanie, Bernaud, "The Economics of Contracts", ~ (2005)
- Schmidt, Karsten, "Gesellschaftsrecht, 4. Aufl.", ~
- Wiedemann, Herbert, "Gesellschaftsrecht, I. Bd.", ~ (1980)