학습경험을 바탕으로 학생들이 제시하는 고등학교 화학교과 내의 어려운 개념과 문지방개념 분석연구
Analysis and Identification of Students’ Threshold Concepts in High School Chemistry
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 과학학습의 어려움이나 낮은 흥미도의 한 원인으로 과학 교과학습에서의 중요한 통로 혹은 입구에 해당 하는 문지방개념의 존재를 가정하고 특히 화학의 어떠한 개념들이 여기에 해당하는지를 알아보았다. 또한, 각 개념의 속성 이 무엇이며 개념을 이해하고 “아~하”의 깨달음을 얻는 경험은 어떠했는지도 함께 알아보았다. 이를 위해, 화학 II를 학습한 239명의 고등학생이 연구에 참여하였고 설문에 대한 응답으로 화학 교과의 어려운 개념이 무엇인지, 문지방에 해당하는 개 념이 무엇인지, 혹은 문지방개념을 이해한 경험이 화학 학습에 어떠한 영향을 주었는지를 설명하였다. 몰과 원자구조가 화 학 교과의 문지방개념으로 제시되었고 구체적으로는 제시된 두 개념이 문지방개념이 되는 속성이 무엇인지를 집중적으로 분 석하였다. 문지방을 극복하고 이해하는 것은 각자의 경험에 따르지만, 문지방개념을 분석하는 기준은 각각의 경험에 일정한 준거를 제시하여 서로 다른 경험들을 객관화 시킬뿐 아니라 개념의 과학적 의미와 본성을 잘 드러내어 준다. 특히, 교사가 제시하는 화학의 문지방개념을 조사한 사전연구와의 비교는 문지방개념의 통합적 속성이 학생들의 학습과 과학흥미도 증진 에 중요함을 보여준다.
Abstract
Concerning the difficulty of learning science and reduced interest in science, the authors of this study searched for potential threshold concepts which are portals or gateways in the field of science (particularly chemistry). The nature of these concepts and how to overcome their troublesomeness were further questioned. For this study, 239 high school students completed chemistry II provided information about what difficult concepts and potential threshold concepts in high school chemistry are and how they affect learning chemistry. In particular, the mastery experience of the threshold concepts was explored in detail. Two, “mole and atomic structure” were selected as threshold concepts in chemistry. Not only as important but also as threshold, this study emphasized the importance of the two concepts in terms of features characterizing them as threshold concepts. In particular, the features objectify subjective experiences of students and provide information describing the scientific meaning and distinctive nature of threshold concepts in science. Along with the data from teachers, this study shows the integrative feature as key criteria for students to make meaningful understanding of the two threshold concepts.
참고문헌 (46)
- Hurd, P. D, , Science Education, 82, pp.407~ (1998)
- Sadler, T. D, , Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 46(8), pp.909~ (2009)
- Lee, M.-K, , International Journal of ScienceEducation, 29(11), pp.1315~ (2007)
- Kind, P. M, , Studies in Science Education, 43(1), pp.1~ (2008)
- Ministry of Education, Science & Technology, "2009 RevisedScience Curriculum", ~ (2009)
- Bybee, R, , International Journal of ScienceEducation, 33(1), pp.7~ (2011)
- Bybee, R, , Journal of Research inScience Teaching, 46, pp.865~ (2009)
- International ComparativeStudy for OECD Academic Achievement, "Kim, K", Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.PISA 2009 report (2010)
- Study Analyzing PISA 2006 Results:Scientific Literacy, Writing, Reading and Mathematics Literacy, "Lee, M", Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.KICE report (2008)
- 김동화, "PISA 2009 과학성취도 상중하 집단별 읽기태도 및 읽기방법의 영향", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(2), pp.545~558 (2013), 한국과학교육학회
- Hwang, Y, "Solutions for the Decrease Numbers of StudentsWho Applied to the Department of Science and Technology", 석사, pp.2006
- Study AboutHow To Reform the System of Teaching and Learning Scienceand Technology To Improve Workforce in the Field, "Ministry of Education", ~, pp.ResearchReport (2008)
- Sadler, T. D, , Journalof Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), pp.235~ (2010)
- DeWitt, J, , International Journal of Science Education, 35(6), pp.1037~ (2013)
- Kwak, Y, , Journal ofKorean Earth Science Society, 27(3), pp.260~ (2006)
- Kim, S, "Development Strategies on the Trend of StudentsAvoiding Science and Engineering", 석사, pp.2002
- Kim, T, , Korean Policy Studies Review, 14(1), pp.243~ (2005)
- Kim, K.-S, , Jouranl of Science Education, 33(1), pp.100~ (2009)
- Krapp, A, , International Journal of ScienceEducation, 33(1), pp.27~ (2011)
- Hidi, S, , Educational Psychologist, 41, pp.111~ (2006)
- 박은정, "Analysis of Mathematical Structure to Identify Students’ Understanding of a Scientific Concept: pH Value and scale", 한국과학교육학회지, 30(7), pp.920~932 (2010), 한국과학교육학회
- Lebard, R, , Proceedingsof the Australian Conference on Science and MathematicsEducation, pp.77~ (2009)
- Meyer, J. H. F, , Higher Education, 49(3), pp.373~ (2003)
- Meyer, J. H. F, "Overcoming Barriers to StudentUnderstanding", pp.3~ (2006), Routledge
- Perkins, D, "Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding", pp.33~ (2006), Routledge
- McClosky, M, "Mental Models", pp.299~ (1983), Erlbaum
- Hahn, C. L, "Cognitive and Instructional Processes inHistory and the Social Sciences", pp.201~ (1994), Erlbaum
- Vygotsky, L. S, "Mind in Society", pp.84~ (1978), Harvard University Press
- Davies, P, "Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding", pp.70~ (2006), Routledge
- Park, E-J, "Threshold Concepts and TransformationalLearning", pp.259~ (2010), Sense Publishers
- Christensen, W. M, , AmericanAssociation of Physics Teachers, 77, pp.907~ (2009)
- Carson, E. M, , The Royal Society of Chemistry, 6(1), pp.4~ (2002)
- Sozbilir, M, , The Royal Society of Chemistry, 6, pp.73~ (2002)
- Thomsan, P. L, , Journal of Research forScience Teaching, 35, pp.1151~ (1998)
- Ribeiro, M. G. T. C, , International Journal of Science Education, 12, pp.391~ (1990)
- Staver, J. R, , Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 32(2), pp.177~ (2006)
- Case, J. M, , International Journal of ScienceEducation, 21(12), pp.1237~ (1999)
- Novik, S, , Journal of Chemical Education, 53(11), pp.720~ (1976)
- Krishnan, S. R, , Journal of Chemical Education, 71(8), pp.653~ (1994)
- Park, E.-J, , International Journal of ScienceEducation, 31(2), pp.233~ (2009)
- Tsitsipis, G, , InternationalJournal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(4), pp.777~ (2012)
- Taber, K. S, , Journal of the LearningSciences, 19(1), pp.99~ (2010)
- Kautz, C. H, , American Journal of Physics, 73, pp.1055~ (2005)
- Kautz, C. H, , American Journal of Physics, 73, pp.1064~ (2005)
- Lederman, N. G, , Journal of ScienceTeacher Education, 3(1), pp.16~ (1992)
- Stevens, S. Y, , Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), pp.687~ (2010)