본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

상법상 이사의 책임제한에 대한 연구

A Study on Limiting Director’s Liability

0

조회

0

다운로드

14

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

This article deals with limitation of director’s liability. It is required all shareholders’ consent that a director’s liability be released under Korean Commercial Code. It is absolutely impossible to get all shareholders’ consent in shareholder meeting, especially in the listed company’s meetings. In Japan, until the revision of 2001 Japan Commercial Act has had the same regulation as in Korea. However, 2001 Commercial Act and 2005 Corporation Act have allowed the limitation and mitigation of directors’ liability. In the United States, since Smith v. Van Gorkom the development in permitting reasonable protection of directors’ from exposure of personal liability, so that directors would not be discouraged from fully and freely carrying out their duties, including risk-taking business. Model Business Corporation Act allows the inclusion of a provision in the articles of incorporation eliminating or limiting, with certain exceptions, the liability of the directors to the corporation or its shareholders for money damages. Almost states and ALI regulations have the similar position. One hand, in discharging their duties directors must always perform in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation. On the other hand, the business judgment of the board has also been protected under the above stated principles. Although 2007 Draft of Commercial Code offers the exemption of directors’ liability against the company, it does not have effectiveness due to the impossibility of getting all shareholders’ consent. Moreover, a division between negligence and gross negligence is to be considered toward the admission of proportionate liability in the future.

Abstract

This article deals with limitation of director’s liability. It is required all shareholders’ consent that a director’s liability be released under Korean Commercial Code. It is absolutely impossible to get all shareholders’ consent in shareholder meeting, especially in the listed company’s meetings. In Japan, until the revision of 2001 Japan Commercial Act has had the same regulation as in Korea. However, 2001 Commercial Act and 2005 Corporation Act have allowed the limitation and mitigation of directors’ liability. In the United States, since Smith v. Van Gorkom the development in permitting reasonable protection of directors’ from exposure of personal liability, so that directors would not be discouraged from fully and freely carrying out their duties, including risk-taking business. Model Business Corporation Act allows the inclusion of a provision in the articles of incorporation eliminating or limiting, with certain exceptions, the liability of the directors to the corporation or its shareholders for money damages. Almost states and ALI regulations have the similar position. One hand, in discharging their duties directors must always perform in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation. On the other hand, the business judgment of the board has also been protected under the above stated principles. Although 2007 Draft of Commercial Code offers the exemption of directors’ liability against the company, it does not have effectiveness due to the impossibility of getting all shareholders’ consent. Moreover, a division between negligence and gross negligence is to be considered toward the admission of proportionate liability in the future.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 권기범, "현대회사법론", ~ (2001)
  2. 서정갑, "주석실무 개정상법총", ~ (1984)
  3. 서돈각, "상법강의(상)" (1999), 법문사
  4. 손주찬, "상법(상)" (2002), 박영사
  5. 손주찬, "주석상법(Ⅱ-하)" (1989), 한국사법행정학회
  6. 이기수, "회사법학" (1997), 박영사
  7. 이병태, "상법(상)", ~ (1988)
  8. 이원석, "신상법(상)", ~ (1984)
  9. 이철송, "회사법강의" (2007), 박영사
  10. 정동윤, "회사법" (2001), 법문사
  11. 정찬형, "회사법강의" (2002), 박영사
  12. 최기원, "신회사법론" (2001), 박영사
  13. 최문희, "이사의 손해배상책임의 제한" (2007), 서울대학교 법학연구소 법학연구총서
  14. 김병연, "자본시장친화적인 회사법제 개선방안" (2006), 한국증권법학회 연구용역보고서
  15. 김성호, "미국에서의 이사의 감시의무와 책임의 완화", 상사법연구, 19(3) (2001), 한국상사법학회
  16. 안성포, "이사의 면책에 관한 입법론적 고찰", 상사법연구, 22(2) (2003), 한국상사법학회
  17. 이균성, "CEO의 책임과 경영판단의 원칙", 상장협, (45) (2002)
  18. 이형규, "사외이사 선임제도 개선방안에 관한 연구" (2002), 상장협 연구보고서
  19. 이형규, "상법 중 회사편(일반)에 대한 개정의견" (2005), 상법개정연구보고서
  20. 정동윤, "주주의 대표소송, 실무상의 문제점을 중심으로", 사법논집, 2 (1972), 법원행정처
  21. 한국증권법학회, "상법개정연구보고서", ~ (2006)
  22. William L. Cary, "Federalism and Corporate Law: Reflections Upon Delaware", 83 Yale L. J. 663
  23. John C. Coffee Jr, "No Exit? : Opting Out, The Contractual Theory of the Corporation, and the Special Case of Remedies, 53 Brook. L. Rev. 919", ~ (1988)
  24. James J. Hanks, Jr., "Evaluating Recent State Legislation on Director and Officer Liability Limitation and Indemnification, 43 Bus. Law, 1207", ~ (1988)
  25. 江頭憲治郞, "?株式會社法?" (2006), 有斐閣
  26. 新谷 承, "取締役の責任輕減化と株主代表訴訟", 法律時報, 71(2) (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)