본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

다화자잡음이 말더듬의 비율과 말속도에 미치는 영향

The Noise Effect on Stuttering and Overall Speech Rate: Multi-talker Babble Noise

정인기|박진
한국음성학회 (The Korean Society of Speech Sciences)|2012.06|말소리와 음성과학 (Phonetics and Speech Sciences)|제4권 제2호|pp. 121-126|DOI http://dx.doi.org/

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

speech ratestutteringnoise effectmulti-talker babble noise
주제분류학제간연구

초록

This study deals with how stuttering changes in its frequency in a situation where adult participants who stutter are exposed to one type of background noise, that is, multi-talker babble noise. Eight American English-speaking adults who stutter participated in this study. Each of the subjects read aloud sentences under each of three speaking conditions (i.e.,typical solo reading (TSR), typical choral reading (TCR), and multi-talker babble noise reading (BNR)). Speech fluency was computed based on a percentage of syllables stuttered (%SS) and speaking rate was also assessed to examine if there was significant change in rates as a measure of vocal change under each of the speaking conditions. The study found that participants read more fluently both during BNR and during TCR than during TSR. The study also found that participants did not show significant changes in speaking rate across the three speaking conditions. Some discussion was provided in relation to the effect of multi-talker babble noise on the frequency of stuttering and its further speculation.

Abstract

This study deals with how stuttering changes in its frequency in a situation where adult participants who stutter are exposed to one type of background noise, that is, multi-talker babble noise. Eight American English-speaking adults who stutter participated in this study. Each of the subjects read aloud sentences under each of three speaking conditions (i.e.,typical solo reading (TSR), typical choral reading (TCR), and multi-talker babble noise reading (BNR)). Speech fluency was computed based on a percentage of syllables stuttered (%SS) and speaking rate was also assessed to examine if there was significant change in rates as a measure of vocal change under each of the speaking conditions. The study found that participants read more fluently both during BNR and during TCR than during TSR. The study also found that participants did not show significant changes in speaking rate across the three speaking conditions. Some discussion was provided in relation to the effect of multi-talker babble noise on the frequency of stuttering and its further speculation.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 이성희, "배경소음의 유형이 정상인의 어음인지력에 미치는 영향", 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학, 52(4), pp.307~311 (2009), 대한이비인후과학회
  2. Andrews, G., "Stuttering: Speech pattern characteristics under fluencyinducingconditions", Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25, pp.208~216 (1982)
  3. Bloodstein, O., "A Handbook on Stuttering" (1995), Thomson-Delmar
  4. Bloodstein, O, "A Handbook of Stuttering" (2006), Thomson-Delmar
  5. Bronkhorst, A. W, "Binaural speechintelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners", Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 86(4), pp.1508~1516 (1989)
  6. Brayton, E. R, "Effects of noise andrhythmic stimulation on the speech of stutterers", Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, pp.285~294 (1978)
  7. Cainer, K. E., "Learningspeech-in-noise discrimination in adult humans", Hearing Research, 238, pp.155~164 (2008)
  8. Cherry, C., "Experiments onthe complete suppression of stammering", Nature, 176, pp.874~875 (1955)
  9. Conover, W. J., "Practical Nonparametric Statistics" (1980), John Wiley and Sons
  10. Daniel, E, "Noise and hearing loss: A review", Journal of School Health, 77(5), pp.225~231 (2007)
  11. Dreschler, W. A., "ICRA noises: Artificial noise signals withspeech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearinginstrument assessment", Audiology, 40, pp.148~157 (2001)
  12. Dunn, L. M, "Peabody Picture VocabularyTest-Third Edition, Bloomington" (1997), Pearson Assessments
  13. Fastle, H., "Information processing in theauditory system, In Psychoacoustics", pp.61~110 (2007), Springer
  14. Garber, S. E, "The effects of white noiseon the frequency of stuttering", Journal of Speech and HearingResearch, 17, pp.73~79 (1974)
  15. Hayden, P. A., "Stutterers’voice initiation times and during condition of novel stimulation", Journal of Fluency Disorders, 7, pp.1~7 (1982)
  16. Ingham, R. J., "Someeffects of the Edinburgh masker on stuttering during oralreading and spontaneous speech", Journal of Fluency Disorders, 6, pp.135~154 (1981)
  17. Jastak, J., "Wide Range AchievementTest-Revised" (1984), Jastak Associates
  18. Kalinowski, J, "Choral speech: theamelioration of stuttering via imitation and the mirror neuronalsystem", Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 27, pp.339~347 (2003)
  19. Kalinowski, J., "Gestural recovery and the role of forward and reversedsyllabic repetitions as stuttering inhibitors in adults", Neuroscience Letters, 363, pp.144~149 (2004)
  20. Katz, J., "Clinical masking, In Handbook of Clinical Audiology", pp.124~141 (2002), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  21. Kern, A, "Der Einfluss des Horens auf das Stottern", Arch.Psychiatr. Nervenkr, 97, pp.429~450 (1932)
  22. Lechner, B. K., "The effects of delayed auditory feedbackand masking on the fundamental frequency of stutterers andnonstutterers", Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 22, pp.343~353 (1979)
  23. Martin, R. R., "Effects of fiveexperimental treatments on stuttering", Journal of Speech andHearing Research, 22, pp.132~146 (1979)
  24. Maraist, J. A., "Effects of auditory maskingupon the speech of stutterers", Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 22, pp.385~389 (1957)
  25. Martin, R. R., "Auditory stimulation, rhythm, and stuttering", Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, pp.487~495 (1985)
  26. Onslow, M., "Parental severityscaling of early stuttered speech: Four case studies", Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 18, pp.47~61 (1990)
  27. Onslow, M., "The LidcombeProgram of Early Stuttering Intervention: A Clinician’s Guide" (2002), Pro-Ed
  28. Perkins, W. H., "The problem of definition: commentary onstuttering", Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 48, pp.246~249 (1983)
  29. Rami, M. K., "Choral reading with filtered speech: Effect onstuttering", Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, pp.421~431 (2005)
  30. Shane, M. L. S., "Effects on stuttering of alteration inauditory feedback, In The Production of Speech", pp.109~136 (1955), Springer
  31. "ASHA", 1962, 408~
  32. Sperry, J. L., "Wordrecognition performance in various background competitors", Journal of American Academy of Audiology, 8, pp.71~80 (1997)
  33. Van Riper, C., "The Nature of Stuttering" (1982), Prentice-Hall
  34. Wingate, M. E., "Effect on stuttering of changes in audition", Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 13, pp.861~873 (1970)
  35. Wingate, M. E., "The Structure of Stuttering: APsycholinguistic Analysis" (1988), Springer
  36. Zurek, P. M., "Consonant reception innoise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearingimpairment", Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 82, pp.1548~1559 (1987)

관련 논문AI추천

배경소음상황에 따른 성인 말더듬화자의 발화 관련 변수 비교박진, 강진석, 오선영, 전제표한국음성학회 · 말소리와 음성과학2015 · 제7권 제1호일반읽기상황과 비교한 합독상황과 백색소음상황에서 말더듬 비율과 조음속도박진, 정인기한국청각언어재활학회 · Audiology and Speech Research2017 · 제13권 제4호문장읽기에서의 말더듬 감소율: 합독과 변조청각피드백박진, 박희영한국음성학회 · 말소리와 음성과학2012 · 제4권 제4호말더듬 성인의 유창한 발화와 비유창한 발화의 말속도 및 발화 길이 특성이수복, 전희정한국청각언어재활학회 · Audiology and Speech Research2019 · 제15권 제3호말운동 연습과 언어적 복잡성이 말더듬 성인의 조음속도에 미치는 영향전희정, Torrey M. Loucks한국음성학회 · 말소리와 음성과학2021 · 제13권 제3호취학 전 말더듬 아동의 말더듬 중증도에 따른 발화 형태 별 조음속도 비교이수복, 전희정한국음성학회 · 말소리와 음성과학2016 · 제8권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)

단어 빈도와 음절 이웃 크기가 한국어 명사의 음성 분절에 미치는 영향송진영, 구민모, 남기춘pp. 3-20중국어 상성이 중국인의 한자어 발음에 미치는 영향 연구: 부분이형동의어를 중심으로유사양, 김영주pp. 21-31벅아이 코퍼스를 이용한 영어 무성파열음의 VOT 연구윤규철pp. 33-40벅아이 코퍼스에서의 젊은 성인 남성의 모음 포먼트 분석노혜욱, 윤규철pp. 41-49중국인 학습자들의 한국어 강세구 실현양상과 오류진단 및 교정방안 연구윤영숙pp. 51-59
원문 보기