단어 빈도와 음절 이웃 크기가 한국어 명사의 음성 분절에 미치는 영향
The Effect of Word Frequency and Neighborhood Density on Spoken Word Segmentation in Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a segmentation unit for a Korean noun is a ‘syllable’ and whether the process of segmenting spoken words occurs at the lexical level. A syllable monitoring task was administered which required participants to detect an auditorily presented target from visually presented words. In Experiment 1, syllable neighborhood density of high frequency words which can be segmented into both CV-CVC and CVC-VC were controlled. The syllable effect and the neighborhood density effect were significant, and the syllable effect emerged differently depending on the syllable neighborhood density. Similar results were obtained in Experiment 2 where low frequency words were used. The significance of word frequency effect on syllable effect was also examined. The results of Experiments 1 and 2 indicated that the segmentation unit for a Korean noun is indeed a ‘syllable’, and this process can occur at the lexical level.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a segmentation unit for a Korean noun is a ‘syllable’ and whether the process of segmenting spoken words occurs at the lexical level. A syllable monitoring task was administered which required participants to detect an auditorily presented target from visually presented words. In Experiment 1, syllable neighborhood density of high frequency words which can be segmented into both CV-CVC and CVC-VC were controlled. The syllable effect and the neighborhood density effect were significant, and the syllable effect emerged differently depending on the syllable neighborhood density. Similar results were obtained in Experiment 2 where low frequency words were used. The significance of word frequency effect on syllable effect was also examined. The results of Experiments 1 and 2 indicated that the segmentation unit for a Korean noun is indeed a ‘syllable’, and this process can occur at the lexical level.
참고문헌 (31)
- 권유안, "한국어 시각단어재인에서 나타나는 이웃효과", 말소리, 1(60), pp.29~45 (2006), 대한음성학회
- 권유안, "(The)Distinct role of phonological and orthographic syllable units in visual word recognition in Korean, Hangul", 박사, pp.2009
- 김지혜, "한국어 시각 단어 재인에서 음운, 표기, 의미 이웃 크기 효과와 과제에 따른 양상", 석사, 심리학, pp.2011
- 이광오, "국어 음운 구조의 심리학적연구: 음성분절 과정에서 음절의 효과", 인문연구, (17), pp.429~453 (1995), 영남대학교인문과학연구소
- 이광오, "음성지각과정에서 음절의 역할과 기저음절의 복원", 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지, 9(1), pp.73~94 (1997)
- Andrews, S, "Frequency and neighborhood effects onlexical access: activation or search?", Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15(5), pp.802~814 (1989)
- Andrews, S, "The effect of orthographic similarity onlexical retrieval: resolving neighborhood conflicts", Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(4), pp.439~461 (1997)
- Bradely, D. D., "The status of the syllable in the perception of Spanishand English", Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, pp.197~233 (1993)
- Carreiras, M., "Effects oforthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition:corss-task comparisons", Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), pp.857~871 (1997)
- Carreiras, M., "Masked priming effects withsyllabic neighbors in a lexical decision task", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(5), pp.1228~1242 (2002)
- Cluff, M. S, "Similarity neighborhoods ofspoken two-syllable words: retroactive effects on multipleactivation", Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance, 16, pp.551~563 (1990)
- Cutler, A., "The syllable'sdiffering role in the segmentation of French and English", Journal of Memory and Language, 25, pp.385~400 (1986)
- Cutler, A, "Mora or phoneme? Furtherevidence for language-specific listening", Journal of Memoryand Language, 33, pp.824~844 (1994)
- Goldinger, S. D., "Priminglexical neighbors of spoken words: effects of competition andinhibition", Journal of Memory and Language, 28, pp.501~518 (1989)
- Grainger, J., "Onthe role of competing word units in visual word recognition:the neighborhood frequency effect", Perception &Psychopsysics, 45(3), pp.189~195 (1989)
- Landauer, T. K, "Structural differencesbetween common and rare words: failure of equivalenceassumptions for theories of word recognition", Journal of VerbalLearning and Verbal Behavior, 12, pp.119~131 (1973)
- Locker, L., "Semanticneighborhood effects on the recognition of ambiguous words", Memory & Cognition, 31(4), pp.505~515 (2003)
- Luce, P. A., "Neighborhoods of words in the mentallexicon", 박사, pp.1986
- Mehler, J., "The syllable's Role in Speech Segmentation", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, pp.298~305 (1981)
- Otake, T., "Mora orsyllable? speech segmentation in Japanese", Journal of Memoryand Language, 32, pp.258~278 (1993)
- Peerman, R, "Orthographic and phonologicalneighborhoods in naming: not all neighbors are equallyinfluential in orthographic space", Journal of Memory and Language, 37, pp.382~410 (1997)
- Pexman, P. M, "Ambiguity and visualword recognition: Can feedback explain both homophone andpolysemy effects?", Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, pp.323~334 (1999)
- Pexman, P. M., "The impact offeedback semantics in visual word recognition:Number-of-features effects in lexical decision and namingtasks", Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, pp.542~549 (2002)
- Pollatsek, A., "The effects of“neighborhood size” in reading and lexical decision", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(4), pp.1142~1158 (1999)
- Savin, H. B., "Word-frequency effect and errors in theperception of speech", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35, pp.200~206 (1963)
- Sebastia-Galles, N., "Contrasting syllabic effects in Catalan and Spanish", Journal of Memory and Language, 31, pp.18~32 (1992)
- Segui, J., "Phonememonitoring, syllable monitoring and lexical access", British Journal of Psychology, 72, pp.471~477 (1981)
- Taft, M, "The influence of orthography onphonological representations in the lexicon", Journal of Memoryand Language, 24, pp.320~335 (1983)
- Vitevitch, M. S., "When words compete:levels of processing in perception of spoken words", Psychological Science, 9(4), pp.325~328 (1998)
- Vitevitch, M. S, "Probabilistic phonotacticsand neighborhood activation in spoken words recognition", Journal of Memory and Language, 40, pp.374~408 (1999)
- Ziegler, J. C., "Neighborhoodeffects in auditory word recognition: phonological competitionand orthographic facilitation", Journal of Memory and Language, 48, pp.779~793 (2002)