말지각의 기초표상 : 음소 또는 변별자질
The Primitive Representation in Speech Perception: Phoneme or Distinctive Features
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Using a target detection task, this study compared the processing automaticity of phonemes and features in spoken syllable stimuli to determine the primitive representation in speech perception, phoneme or distinctive feature. For this, we modified the visual search task(Treisman et al., 1992) developed to investigate the processing of visual features(ex. color, shape or their conjunction) for auditory stimuli. In our task, the distinctive features(ex. aspiration or coronal) corresponded to visual primitive features(ex. color and shape), and the phonemes(ex. /th/) to visual conjunctive features(ex. colored shapes). The automaticity is measured by the set size effect that was the increasing amount of reaction time when the number of distracters increased. Three experiments were conducted. The laryngeal features(experiment 1), the manner features(experiment 2), and the place features(experiment 3) were compared with phonemes. The results showed that the distinctive features are consistently processed faster and automatically than the phonemes. Additionally there were differences in the processing automaticity among the classes of distinctive features. The laryngeal features are the most automatic, the manner features are moderately automatic and the place features are the least automatic. These results are consistent with the previous studies(Bae et al., 2002; Bae, 2010) that showed the perceptual hierarchy of distinctive features.
Abstract
Using a target detection task, this study compared the processing automaticity of phonemes and features in spoken syllable stimuli to determine the primitive representation in speech perception, phoneme or distinctive feature. For this, we modified the visual search task(Treisman et al., 1992) developed to investigate the processing of visual features(ex. color, shape or their conjunction) for auditory stimuli. In our task, the distinctive features(ex. aspiration or coronal) corresponded to visual primitive features(ex. color and shape), and the phonemes(ex. /th/) to visual conjunctive features(ex. colored shapes). The automaticity is measured by the set size effect that was the increasing amount of reaction time when the number of distracters increased. Three experiments were conducted. The laryngeal features(experiment 1), the manner features(experiment 2), and the place features(experiment 3) were compared with phonemes. The results showed that the distinctive features are consistently processed faster and automatically than the phonemes. Additionally there were differences in the processing automaticity among the classes of distinctive features. The laryngeal features are the most automatic, the manner features are moderately automatic and the place features are the least automatic. These results are consistent with the previous studies(Bae et al., 2002; Bae, 2010) that showed the perceptual hierarchy of distinctive features.
참고문헌 (41)
- 배문정, "한국어 변별 자질의 지각적 표상 구조", 박사, 인지과학, pp.2003
- 배문정, "고설 모음 환경에서 한국어 자음의 지각적 구조", 말소리와 음성과학, 1(2), pp.95~103 (2009), 한국음성학회
- 배문정, "한국어 단음절에서 자음과 모음 자질의 비선형적 지각", 말소리와 음성과학, 1(4), pp.29~38 (2009), 한국음성학회
- 배문정, "한국어 자음에서 변별 자질들의 지각적 위계", 말소리와 음성과학, 2(4), pp.109~118 (2010), 한국음성학회
- 배문정, "한국어 자음의 지각적 구조", 한국심리학회지 : 실험 및 인지, 14(4), pp.375~408 (2002)
- Boersma, P., "Functional Phonology: formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives" (1998), Holland Academic Graphics
- Broadbent, D. E., "Perception and Communication" (1958), Pergammon Press
- Browman, C., "Articulatory phonology : An overview", Phonetica, 49, pp.155~180 (1992)
- Chomsky, N., "The sound pattern of English" (1968), Harper and Row
- Clements, G. N., "The geometry of phonological features", Phonology Yearbook, 2, pp.225~252 (1985)
- Cutler, A., "The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 14, pp.113~121 (1988)
- Dahan, D., "Spoken-word recognition, In Handbook of Psycholinguistics", pp.249~283 (2006), Academic Press
- Eimas P D., "Asymmetric dependencies in processing phonetic features", Perception & Psychophysics, 23(1), pp.12~20 (1978)
- Eimas, P. D., "Dependency Relations During the Processing of Speech, In Perspectives in the Study of Speech", pp.283~309 (1981), Lawrence Erlbaum Ass
- Fowler, C. A., "Speech production, In Handbook of Perception and Cognition: Speech, Language and Communication (vol 11)" (1995), Academic Press
- Frauenfelder, U. H., "Phoneme monitoring and lexical processing : Evidence for associative context effects", Memory and Cognition, 17, pp.134~140 (1989)
- Goldinger, S. D., "Speech perception and spoken word recognition, In Principles of Experimental Phonetics", pp.277~327 (1996)
- Goldsmith, J., "Autosegmental phonology", 박사, pp.1976
- Jakobson, R., "Preliminaries to Speech Analysis" (1952), MIT Press
- Kim, K. H., "The Phonological Representation of Distinctive Features: Korean Consonantal Phonology", 박사, pp.1987
- 고영진, "변별자질 그 탄생과 활약" (2000), 동인
- Kohler, K., "Segmental reduction in connected speech in German: phonological facts and phonetic explanations, In Speech production and speech modelling", pp.69~92 (1990), Kluwer
- Lahiri, A., "Lexical processing and phonological representa- tion, In Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody", pp.229~260 (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Lahiri, A., "Distinctive features : Phonological underspecification in representation and processing", Journal of Phonetics, 38, pp.44~59 (2010)
- 이광오, "음성지각 과정에서 음절의 역할과 기저 음절의 복원", 한국심리학회지 : 실험 및 인지, 9, pp.73~94 (1997)
- Liberman, A. M, "The motor theory of speech perception revised", Cognition, 21, pp.136~ (1985)
- Lindblom, B., "Systemic constraints and adaptive change in the formation of sound structure, In Approaches to the evolution of language: social and cognitive bases" (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Lindblom, B., "Developmental origins of adult phonology : The interplay between phonetic emergents and the evolutionary adaptations of sound patterns", Phonetica, 57, pp.297~314 (2000)
- Marslen-Wilson, W. D., "Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access : Words, phonemes, and features", Psychological Review, 101, pp.653~675 (1994)
- McCarthy, J. J., "The phonetics and phonology of semitic pharyngeals, In Patricia Keating, Papers in Laboratory Phonology III: Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form", pp.191~233 (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Miller, G. A., "An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants", The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, pp.623~638 (1955)
- Mitchell, L. M., "Perceptual structure of 16 prevoclaic English consonants sententially embedded", The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, pp.1355~1357 (1974)
- Pitt, M. A., "The use of rhythm in attending to speech", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 16, pp.564~573 (1990)
- Port, R., "The graphical basis of phones and phonemes, In Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production", pp.349~365 (2006), John Benjamins
- Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar, "Prince, A.", ~, pp.Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science Technical Report 2 (1993)
- Repp, B. H., "Phonetic categories are flexible, In Categorical perception", pp.89~112 (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Sehneider, W., "Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention", Psych. Rev, 84, pp.1~66 (1977)
- Stevens, K. N., "Models of phonetic recognition II: A feature-based model of speech recognition", Proceedings of the Montreal Satellite Symposium on Speech Recognition, Twelfth International Congress on Acoustics (1986)
- Treisman, A., "Emergent features, attention and object perception", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 10, pp.12~21 (1984)
- Treisman, A., "Automatic and preattentive processing", American Journal of Psychology, 105, pp.341~362 (1992)
- Wang, M. D., "Consonant confusions in noise : a study of perceptual features", The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, pp.1248~1266 (1973)