Language Specificity in Perceptual Compensation for Native and Non-native Assimilation
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The present study investigated whether compensation for phonological assimilation is driven by multiple mechanisms, as suggested by Darcy et al. (2009). Native and non-native speakers of Korean were tested on their compensation for the Korean place and nasal assimilations using two different types of experimental tasks, phoneme monitoring and cross-modal priming with a lexical decision, each of which is expected to provoke responses in a low auditory level and a more abstract phonological level. The results demonstrated that native and non-native listeners relied on the acoustic characteristics of the stimuli in the phoneme-monitoring task (Experiment 1), whereas in the lexical decision task, only native listeners employed phonological knowledge of the manner in which assimilation functions in Korean (Experiments 2 and 3). However, compensation for phonological assimilation appeared to operate less strongly in the presence of optional rules than in the presence of obligatory rules. Together, these results suggest that compensation is driven by both language-specific and universal auditory mechanisms at distinct levels.
Abstract
The present study investigated whether compensation for phonological assimilation is driven by multiple mechanisms, as suggested by Darcy et al. (2009). Native and non-native speakers of Korean were tested on their compensation for the Korean place and nasal assimilations using two different types of experimental tasks, phoneme monitoring and cross-modal priming with a lexical decision, each of which is expected to provoke responses in a low auditory level and a more abstract phonological level. The results demonstrated that native and non-native listeners relied on the acoustic characteristics of the stimuli in the phoneme-monitoring task (Experiment 1), whereas in the lexical decision task, only native listeners employed phonological knowledge of the manner in which assimilation functions in Korean (Experiments 2 and 3). However, compensation for phonological assimilation appeared to operate less strongly in the presence of optional rules than in the presence of obligatory rules. Together, these results suggest that compensation is driven by both language-specific and universal auditory mechanisms at distinct levels.
참고문헌 (41)
- Ahn, S.-C., "An introduction to Korean phonology" (1998), Hanshin
- 조태홍, "A Preliminary Report on Perceptual Resolutions of Korean Consonant Cluster Simplification and Their Possible Change over Time", 말소리와 음성과학, 2(4), pp.83~92 (2010), 한국음성학회
- Cho, T., "Not all sounds in assimilation environment are perceived equally: Evidence from Korean", Journal of Phonetics, 36, pp.239~249 (2008)
- Coenen, E., "Variation and assimilation in German: Consequences for lexical access and representation", Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, pp.535~564 (2001)
- Cutler, A., "Pseudo-homophony in non-native listening", Acoustical Society of America, ~ (2004)
- Darcy, I., "Cross-linguistic study of compensation for phonological variations: Monolingual and bilingual accounts", Paper presented at the ISCA workshop on temporal integration in the perception of speech (2002)
- Darcy, I., "Bilinguals play by the rules: Perceptual compensation for assimilation in late L2-learners, In Laboratory Phonology 9", pp.411~442 (2007), Mouton de Gruyter
- Darcy, I., "Phonological knowledge in compensation for native and non-native assimilation, In Variation and gradience in phonetics and phonology" (2009), Mouton de Gruyter
- Doupoux, E., "Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish", Cognition, 106(2), pp.682~706 (2008)
- Duanmu, S., "The phonology of Standard Chinese" (2000), Oxford University Press
- Gaskell, M. G., "Phonological variation and inference in lexical access", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, pp.144~158 (1996)
- Gaskell, M. G., "Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, pp.380~396 (1998)
- Gaskell, M. G., "Lexical ambiguity resolution and spoken word recognition: Bridging the gap", Journal of Memory and Language, 44, pp.325~349 (2001)
- Gow, D. W., "Assimilation and anticipation in continuous spoken word recognition", Journal of Memory and Language, 45, pp.133~159 (2001)
- Gow, D. W, "Does English coronal place assimilation create lexical ambiguity?", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, pp.163~179 (2002)
- Gow, D. W., "Feature parsing: Feature cue mapping in spoken word recognition", Perception and Psychophysics, 65, pp.575~590 (2003)
- Gow, D. W., "A cross-linguistic examination of assimilation context effects", Journal of Memory and Language, 51, pp.279~296 (2004)
- Halles, P. A., "The format of representation of recognized words in infants’ early receptive lexicon", Infant Behavior and Development, 19, pp.463~481 (1994)
- 한정임, "Lexical Encoding of L2 Suprasegmentals: Evidence from Korean Learners’ Acquisition of Japanese Vowel Length Distinctions", 말소리와 음성과학, 1(4), pp.17~27 (2009), 한국음성학회
- Jun, J., "Perceptual and articulatory factors in place assimilation: An optimality theoretic approach", 박사, pp.1995
- Jusczyk, P., "The discovery of spoken language" (1997), MIT Press
- Jusczyk, P., "Infants’ detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speech", Cognitive Psychology, 29, pp.1~23 (1995)
- Kay-Raining Bird, E., "Partial representations and phonological selectivity", Unpublished manuscript, ~ (1996)
- Kim-Renaud, Y.-K., "Korean consonantal phonology" (1991), Hanshin
- Kochetov, Al., "Phonetic variability and grammatical knowledge: An articulatory study of Korean place assimilation", Phonology, 25, pp.399~431 (2009)
- Lahiri, A., "The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon", Cognition, 38, pp.245~294 (1991)
- Marslen-Wilson, W. D., "Phonological variation in lexical access: Abstractness, inference and English place assimilation", Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, pp.285~308 (1995)
- Mitterer, H., "Coping with phonological assimilation in speech perception: Evidence for early compensation", Perception and Psychophysics, 65, pp.956~969 (2003)
- Mitterer, H., "The recognition of phonologically assimilated words does not depend on specific language experience", Cognitive Science, 30, pp.451~479 (2006)
- Myers, J., "Infants’ sensitivity to word boundaries in fluent speech", Journal of Child Language, 23, pp.1~30 (1996)
- Ogasawara, N., "Processing missing vowels: Allophonic processing in Japanese", Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, pp.376~411 (2009)
- Pallier, C., "The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: Exemplar-based vs. abstract lexical entries", Psychological Science, 12, pp.445~449 (2001)
- Pater, J., "The perceptual acquisition of phonological contrasts", Language, 80, pp.384~402 (2004)
- Sohn, H.-M., "The Korean language" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Son, M., "The role of gestural overlap in perceptual place assimilation in Korean, In Papers in laboratory phonology 9", pp.504~534 (2007), Mouton de Gruyter
- Stager, C., "Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks", Nature, 388(6640), pp.381~382 (1997)
- Teichmann, M., "The role of the striatum in phonological processing: Evidence from early stages of Huntington’s disease", Cortex, 45(7), pp.839~849 (2009)
- Werker, J., "Developmental changes in infant speech perception and early word learning: Is there a link?, In Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the Lexicon", pp.181~193 (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Zsiga, E., "External sandhi in a second language: The phonetics and phonology of obstruent nasalization in Korean-accented English", 석사, pp.2010
- Warner, N., "Use of complex phonological patterns in processing: Evidence from Korean", Journal of Linguistics, 41, pp.1~35 (2005)
- Weber, A., "Help or hindrance: How violation of different assimilation rules affects spoken language processing", Language and Speech, 44, pp.95~118 (2001)