본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of Effectiveness of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation for the Initial Treatment of Preterm Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Prospective Pilot Study

이현수|민세라
대한신생아학회 (THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF NEONATOLOGY)|2014.08|Neonatal medicine|제21권 제3호|pp. 158-165

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Nasal continuous positive airway pressureNasal intermittent positive pressure ventilationPreterm respiratory distress syndrome

초록

Purpose: To compare respiratory and clinical outcomes between the currently used strategy of Intubation, Surfactant, Extubation (InSurE) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and the alternative strategy of InSurE and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) for the initial treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm newborns ≤32 weeks. Methods: Twenty-six comparable preterm infants with RDS were included in the study; 13 were randomized to NCPAP and 13 to NIPPV. In both groups, the InSurE procedure consisted of intubation, surfactant instillation and 2 h positive pressure ventilation followed by extubation, after which spontaneously breathing newborns were placed on NCPAP or NIPPV. Results: There were no differences in demographic characteristics or cardiorespiratory status among preterm infants enrolled in the study. The reinutation rate was lower among the infants treated with NIPPV than among those on NCPAP (8% vs. 46%, P<0.05) and the rate of aminophylline use between 4 and 7 days of age of was lower in the NIPPV group compared to the NCPAP group (8% vs. 30%, P<0.05). In addition, “InSurE with NIPPV” significantly reduced the overall duration of endotracheal ventilation and shortened the time to first feed compared to “InSurE with NCPAP”. Conclusion: “InSurE with NIPPV” displayed therapeutic benefits as the initial treatment of preterm RDS when compared with the currently used ventilator strategy, “InSurE with NCPAP” by preventing re-intubation and shortening the duration of endotracheal ventilation.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare respiratory and clinical outcomes between the currently used strategy of Intubation, Surfactant, Extubation (InSurE) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and the alternative strategy of InSurE and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) for the initial treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm newborns ≤32 weeks. Methods: Twenty-six comparable preterm infants with RDS were included in the study; 13 were randomized to NCPAP and 13 to NIPPV. In both groups, the InSurE procedure consisted of intubation, surfactant instillation and 2 h positive pressure ventilation followed by extubation, after which spontaneously breathing newborns were placed on NCPAP or NIPPV. Results: There were no differences in demographic characteristics or cardiorespiratory status among preterm infants enrolled in the study. The reinutation rate was lower among the infants treated with NIPPV than among those on NCPAP (8% vs. 46%, P<0.05) and the rate of aminophylline use between 4 and 7 days of age of was lower in the NIPPV group compared to the NCPAP group (8% vs. 30%, P<0.05). In addition, “InSurE with NIPPV” significantly reduced the overall duration of endotracheal ventilation and shortened the time to first feed compared to “InSurE with NCPAP”. Conclusion: “InSurE with NIPPV” displayed therapeutic benefits as the initial treatment of preterm RDS when compared with the currently used ventilator strategy, “InSurE with NCPAP” by preventing re-intubation and shortening the duration of endotracheal ventilation.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Jobe AH, "Prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia", Curr Opin Pediatr, 13, pp.124~129 (2001)
  2. Owen LS, "Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: a survey of practice in England", Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 93, pp.F148~F150 (2008)
  3. Moretti C, "Nasal flow-synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation to facilitate weaning in very low-birth weight infants:Unmasked randomized controlled trial", Pediatr Int, 50, pp.85~91 (2008)
  4. Gittermann MK, "Early nasal continuous positive treatment reduces the need for intubation in very low birth weight infants", Eur J Paediatr, 156, pp.384~388 (1997)
  5. Polin RA, "Newer experience with CPAP", Semin Neonatol, 7, pp.379~389 (2002)
  6. De Klerk AM, "Nasal continuous positive airway pressure and outcomes of preterm infants", J Pediatr Child Health, 37, pp.161~167 (2001)
  7. Ho JJ, "Continuous distending pressure for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, pp.CD002271~ (2000)[DOI]
  8. Kulikarni A, "Effect of introduction of synchronized nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation in a neonatal intensive care unit on bronchopulmonary dysplasia and growth in preterm infant", Am J Perinatol, 23, pp.233~240 (2006)
  9. Jackson JK, "Evidencebased approach to change in clinical practice: Introduction of expanded nasal continuous positive airway pressure use in an intensive care nursery", Pediatrics, 111, pp.e542~e547 (2003)
  10. Hutchison AA, "Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in the preterm neonate: reducing endotrauma and the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia", Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 93, pp.F64~F68 (2008)
  11. Khalaf MN, "A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation", Pediatrics, 108, pp.13~17 (2001)
  12. Barrington K, "Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants", Pediatrics, 107, pp.638~641 (2001)
  13. Partridge JC, "Optimal timing for diagnostic cranial ultrasound in low-birth weight infants:detection of intracranial hemorrhage and ventricular dilatation", J Pediatr, 102, pp.281~287 (1983)
  14. Shennan AT, "Abnormal pulmonary outcomes in premature infants: prediction from oxygen requirement in the neonatal period", Pediatrics, 82, pp.527~532 (1988)
  15. Bell MJ, "Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: therapeutic decisions based on clinical staging", Ann Surg, 187, pp.1~7 (1978)
  16. "The Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity. An international classification of retinopathy of prematurity", Arch Ophthalmol, 102, pp.1130~1134 (1984)
  17. Millar D, "Benefits of non invasive ventilation", Indian Pediatr, 41, pp.1008~1017 (2004)
  18. Santin R, "A prospective observational pilot study of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) as a primary mode of ventilation in infants > or = 28 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS)", J Perinatol, 24, pp.487~493 (2004)
  19. Dumpa V, "SNIPPV vs NIPPV:does synchronization matter?", J Perinatol, 32, pp.438~442 (2012)
  20. Lin CH, "Efficacy of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating apnea of prematurity", Pediatr Pulmonol, 26, pp.349~353 (1998)
  21. Lachmann B, "Open up the lung and keep the lung open", Intensive Care Med, 18, pp.319~321 (1992)
  22. De Paoli AG, "Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal intermittent positive ventilation for preterm neonates: a systemic review and meta-analysis", Acta Paediatr, 92, pp.70~75 (2003)
  23. Davis PG, "Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, pp.CD003212~ (2001)[DOI]
  24. Mishra S, "Apnea in the newborn", Indian J Pediatr, 75, pp.57~61 (2008)
  25. Stefanescu BM, "A randomized, controlled trial comparing two different continuous positive airway pressure systems for the successful extubation of extremely low birth weight infants", Pediatrics, 112, pp.1031~1038 (2003)
  26. Henderson-Smart DJ, "Prophylactic methylxanthines for extubation in preterm infants", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, pp.CD000139~ (2010)[DOI]
  27. Foster LJ, "Bronchodilator effects on gastric acid secretion", JAMA, 241, pp.2613~2615 (1979)
  28. Bancalari E, "Bronchopulmonary dysplasia:changes in pathogenesis, epidemiology and definition", Semin Neonatal, 8, pp.63~71 (2003)
  29. Walsh MC, "Summary proceedings from the bronchopulmonary dysplasia group", Pediatrics, 117, pp.S52~S56 (2006)
  30. Garland JS, "Increased risk of gastrointestinal perforation in neonates mechanically ventilated with either face mask or nasal prongs", Pediatrics, 76, pp.406~410 (1985)
  31. Meneses J, "Nasal intermittent positivepressure ventilation vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a systemic review and meta-analysis", Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 166, pp.372~376 (2012)
  32. Friedlich P, "A randomized trial of nasopharyngeal-synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in very low birth weight infants after extubaiton", J Perinatol, 19, pp.413~418 (1999)
  33. Aghai ZH, "Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) decreases work of breathing (WOB) in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP)", Pediatr Pulmonol, 41, pp.875~881 (2006)
  34. Jounieaux V, "Effects of nasal positive-pressure hyperventilation on the glottis in normal awake subjects", J Appl Physiol(1985), 79, pp.176~185 (1995)
  35. Moretti C, "Comparing the effects of nasal synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nSIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) after extubation in very low weight infants", Early Hum Dev, 56, pp.167~177 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

Comparison of Respiratory Outcomes between Less Invasive Surfactant Administration and the Intubation- Surfactant-Extubation Technique in Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome박원순, 성세인, 장윤실, Hyeseon Kim, Hyun Ho Kim, Misun Yang, So Yoon Ahn, Yea Seul Han대한신생아학회 · Neonatal medicine2020 · 제27권 제3호Pulmonary Outcomes of Early Extubation in Extremely Premature Infants (Gestational Age: 25–26 Weeks) with Synchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation김천수, 박재현, 이상락, 최은미대한신생아학회 · Neonatal medicine2016 · 제23권 제2호Factors Associated with Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation Failure in Late Preterm and Term Infants with Respiratory Distress after Birth심규홍대한신생아학회 · Neonatal medicine2022 · 제29권 제1호Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy via Tracheal Catheterization in Neonates with a Gestational Age of 30 Weeks or More Diagnosed with Respiratory Distress SyndromeGyu Hong Shim, Moon Young Seo, Myoung Jae Chey대한신생아학회 · Neonatal medicine2018 · 제25권 제3호A Comparison of Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula with Bubble CPAP in Very Low Birth Weight Infants권명훈, 김상범, 박문성, 이장훈, 이정주대한신생아학회 · Neonatal medicine2013 · 제20권 제4호Is Less Invasive Surfactant Administration Better than INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation for Prophylactic Surfactant Replacement Therapy?Gyu Hong Shim, Hyung-Joon Joo대한신생아학회 · Neonatal medicine2022 · 제29권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

한국인 신생아에서의 출생모반의 빈도남승우, 고선영, 이연경, 신손문, 김인형pp. 151-157태변 흡입 증후군 환아에서 신생아 지속성 폐고혈압증 발생과 관련된 동반 인자최민규, 이은채, 최명재, 심규홍, 송영환pp. 166-171극소저출생체중아들에서 낭종성뇌실주위백질연화증과 관련한 위험인자에 대한 분석박종모, 이현주, 김창렬, 박현경, 손인아, 설인준, 최병선pp. 172-178출생체중 1,000 g 이상 미숙아를 대상으로 시행한 미숙아 망막증 선별검사성세인, 윤신애, 전지영, 안소윤, 장윤실, 최수영, 박가영, 유혜수, 박원순pp. 179-185퇴원 전 교육이 유아용 카시트의 올바른 사용에 미치는 효과김영돈pp. 186-191
원문 보기