A Comparison of Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula with Bubble CPAP in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To compare the effect of humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) with that of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) as the mode of extubation in very low birth weight infants (VLBWI). Methods: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for 219 VLBWI who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of Ajou University Hospital from January 2009 through December 2012; 87 were supported by noninvasive ventilation (NIV) after extubation (HHFNC n=47, NCPAP n=40). Extubation failure was defined as the need for reintubation within 1 week of extubation. Results: (1) There were no significant differences between the groups in demographic data such as gestational age, birth weight, and age at extubation. (2) There were no significant differences in fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) (HHFNC 0.23±0.03 vs. NCPAP 0.23±0.03, P-value .937) and peak inspiratory pressure (HHFNC 11±6.6 cmH2O vs. NCPAP 10.3±3.4 cmH2O, P-value .559) before extubation. (3) The rate of extubation failure and FiO2 values after extubation were similar in the 2 groups (extubation failure, HHFNC 5/47 vs. NCPAP 5/40, P-value 1.000; FiO2, HHFNC 0.24±0.05 vs. NCPAP 0.25±0.04, P-value .399). (4) Among patients who received NIV after extubation once but did not receive further intubation, the duration of NIV or duration of oxygen supply were not significantly different between the groups (NIV, HHFNC 12.4±9.1 days vs. NCPAP 8.7±12.3 days, P-value .159, oxygen supply, HHFNC 49.0±40.3 days vs. NCPAP 50.9±41.3 days, P-value .844) or bronchopulmonary dysplasia rate (HHFNC 24.3% vs. NCPAP 34.4%, P-value .430). Conclusion: HHFNC is as effective as NCPAP for weaning VLBWIs from invasive mechanical ventilation.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the effect of humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) with that of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) as the mode of extubation in very low birth weight infants (VLBWI). Methods: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for 219 VLBWI who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of Ajou University Hospital from January 2009 through December 2012; 87 were supported by noninvasive ventilation (NIV) after extubation (HHFNC n=47, NCPAP n=40). Extubation failure was defined as the need for reintubation within 1 week of extubation. Results: (1) There were no significant differences between the groups in demographic data such as gestational age, birth weight, and age at extubation. (2) There were no significant differences in fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) (HHFNC 0.23±0.03 vs. NCPAP 0.23±0.03, P-value .937) and peak inspiratory pressure (HHFNC 11±6.6 cmH2O vs. NCPAP 10.3±3.4 cmH2O, P-value .559) before extubation. (3) The rate of extubation failure and FiO2 values after extubation were similar in the 2 groups (extubation failure, HHFNC 5/47 vs. NCPAP 5/40, P-value 1.000; FiO2, HHFNC 0.24±0.05 vs. NCPAP 0.25±0.04, P-value .399). (4) Among patients who received NIV after extubation once but did not receive further intubation, the duration of NIV or duration of oxygen supply were not significantly different between the groups (NIV, HHFNC 12.4±9.1 days vs. NCPAP 8.7±12.3 days, P-value .159, oxygen supply, HHFNC 49.0±40.3 days vs. NCPAP 50.9±41.3 days, P-value .844) or bronchopulmonary dysplasia rate (HHFNC 24.3% vs. NCPAP 34.4%, P-value .430). Conclusion: HHFNC is as effective as NCPAP for weaning VLBWIs from invasive mechanical ventilation.
참고문헌 (18)
- De Paoli AG, "Nasal CPAP for neonates: what do we know in 2003?", Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 88, pp.F168~F172 (2003)
- Hudson LD, "Progress in understanding ventilator-induced lung injury", JAMA, 282, pp.77~78 (1999)
- Jobe AH, "Mechanisms initiating lung injury in the preterm", Early Hum Dev, 53, pp.81~94 (1998)
- Andrade FH, "Noninvasive ventilation in neonates: the lungs don’t like it!", J Appl Physiol(1985), 105, pp.1385~1386 (2008)
- de Klerk A, "Humidified high-flow nasal cannula: is it the new and improved CPAP?", Adv Neonatal Care, 8, pp.98~106 (2008)
- Robertson NJ, "Nasal deformities resulting from flow driver continuous positive airway pressure", Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 75, pp.F209~F212 (1996)
- Sreenan C, "High-flow nasal cannulae in the management of apnea of prematurity: a comparison with conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure", Pediatrics, 107, pp.1081~1083 (2001)
- Locke RG, "Inadvertent administration of positive end-distending pressure during nasal cannula flow", Pediatrics, 91, pp.135~138 (1993)
- Frey B, "Nasopharyngeal oxygen therapy produces positive end-expiratory pressure in infants", Eur J Pediatr, 160, pp.556~560 (2001)
- Saslow JG, "Work of breathing using high-flow nasal cannula in preterm infants", J Perinatol, 26, pp.476~480 (2006)
- Waugh JB, "An evaluation of 2 new devices for nasal high-flow gas therapy", Respir Care, 49, pp.902~906 (2004)
- Jobe AH, "Bronchopulmonary dysplasia", Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 163, pp.1723~1729 (2001)
- Kamitsuka MD, "The incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis after introducing standardized feeding schedules for infants between 1250 and 2500 grams and less than 35 weeks of gestation", Pediatrics, 105, pp.379~384 (2000)
- Papile LA, "Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1500 gm", J Pediatr, 92, pp.529~534 (1978)
- Shoemaker MT, "High flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for neonatal respiratory disease: a retrospective study", J Perinatol, 27, pp.85~91 (2007)
- Holleman-Duray D, "Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula: use and a neonatal early extubation protocol", J Perinatol, 27, pp.776~781 (2007)
- Campbell DM, "Nasal continuous positive airway pressure from high flow cannula versus Infant Flow for Preterm infants", J Perinatol, 26, pp.546~549 (2006)
- 윤성호, "미숙아에서 경비지속기도양압과 가습고유량비강캐뉼라의 사용에 대한 비교 연구", Neonatal medicine, 18(2), pp.293~300 (2011), 대한신생아학회