음성장애인의 자가음성평가와 정상음성인의 청자음성평가 특성 비교
Comparative Studies on the Self Voice Assessment of Voice Disorder Patients and the Hearer Voice Assessment of a Comparative Group of normal subjects
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper will discuss the difference between self assessment of voice disorders and the hearer voice assessment of a comparative group of normal subjects. The study was conducted on 25 voice disorder subjects and 32 hearers of a comparative group of normal subjects. The results are as follows. Firstly, in K-VHI and VHI-H, the hearers of the comparative group of normal subjects perceived more serious voice disorders than the voice disorder group in all sub-domains. Likewise, in K-VQOL and VRQOL-H, the hearers of the comparative group of normal subjects perceived more serious voice disorders than the voice disorder group in all sub-domains. Secondly, the hearer voice assessment of the comparative group of normal subjects showed no difference in gender regarding the perception of the severity of voice disorder issues. Thirdly, the hearer voice assessment of the comparative group of normal subjects states that in the emotional aspects of VHI-H, professional voice users perceive more serious voice disorders than others. Accordingly, in VRQOL-H,there was no difference in use of the voice between professionals and others.
Abstract
This paper will discuss the difference between self assessment of voice disorders and the hearer voice assessment of a comparative group of normal subjects. The study was conducted on 25 voice disorder subjects and 32 hearers of a comparative group of normal subjects. The results are as follows. Firstly, in K-VHI and VHI-H, the hearers of the comparative group of normal subjects perceived more serious voice disorders than the voice disorder group in all sub-domains. Likewise, in K-VQOL and VRQOL-H, the hearers of the comparative group of normal subjects perceived more serious voice disorders than the voice disorder group in all sub-domains. Secondly, the hearer voice assessment of the comparative group of normal subjects showed no difference in gender regarding the perception of the severity of voice disorder issues. Thirdly, the hearer voice assessment of the comparative group of normal subjects states that in the emotional aspects of VHI-H, professional voice users perceive more serious voice disorders than others. Accordingly, in VRQOL-H,there was no difference in use of the voice between professionals and others.
참고문헌 (19)
- Bhuta, T., "Perceptualevaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acousticmeasurements", Journal of Voice, 18(3), pp.299~304 (2004)
- Boone, D. R., "Thevoice and voice therapy" (2005), Allen and Bacon
- Cohen, S. M., "Creation and validation of the singing voice handicapindex", The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 116(6), pp.402~406 (2007)
- Franic, D. M., "Psychometric evaluation of disease specific quality of lifeinstruments in voice disorders", Journal of Voice, 19(2), pp.300~315 (2005)
- Hogikyan, N. D., "Validation of aninstrument to measure voice-related quality of life(VRQOL)", Journal of Voice, 13(4), pp.557~567 (1999)
- Hogikyan, N. D., "Longitudinal effects of botulinum toxin injections onvoice-related quality of life(V-RQOL) for patients withadductory spasmodic dysphonia", Journal of Voice, 15(4), pp.576~586 (2001)
- Jacobson, B. H., "The voice handicapindex(VHI): Development and validation", American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, (6), pp.66~70 (1997)
- 강선정, "E-Prime으로 제작한 청지각적 음성평가 훈련프로그램이 음성평가 능력 향상에 미치는 효과", 석사, 재활과학, pp.2011
- Karnell, M. P., "Reliability ofclinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based(V-RQOL and IPVI) documenation of voice disorder", Journal of Voice, 21(5), pp.576~590 (2007)
- 김재옥, "평가자의 청지각적 음성평가와 대상자의 주관적 음성평가 비교", Communication Sciences and Disorders, 14(2), pp.223~235 (2009), 한국언어청각임상학회
- 김재옥, "한국어판 음성장애지수와 음성관련 삶의 질의 타당도 및 신뢰도 연구", 음성과학, 14(3), pp.111~125 (2007), 한국음성과학회
- 이아람, "성악가를 위한 한국어 음성장애지수(K-SVHI)의 적용 연구", 석사, 언어병리학, pp.2008
- Murry, T., "Therelationship between ratings of voice quality and quality of lifemeasures", Journal of Voice, 18(2), pp.183~192 (2004)
- Rosen, C. A., "Voice handicap index change following treatment ofvoice disorders", Journal of Voice, 14(4), pp.619~623 (2000)
- Wingate, J. M., "Treatment outcomes for professionalvoice users, Journal of Voice, Vol", Journal of Voice, 21(4), pp.433~449 (2007)
- Wingate, J. M., "Voice handicap index results forolder patients with adductor spasmodic dysphonia, Journal ofVoice, Vol", Journal of Voice, 19(1), pp.124~131 (2005)
- 윤영선, "한국어판 음성장애지수 (Korean-Voice Handicap Index) : 번안본 검증 및 새 지수 개발", 박사, 언어병리학, pp.2007
- Zraick, R. I., "Assessment of quality oflife in persons with voice disorders", Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 16(3), pp.188~193 (2008)
- Zraick, R. L., "Patient versuspartner perception of voice handicap", Journal of Voice, 21(4), pp.485~494 (2007)