본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

음성장애가 있는 직업적 음성사용자와 비직업적 음성사용자의 음성장애 중증도와 유형에 따른 자기보고식 음성평가 차이

Comparison of Self-Reporting Voice Evaluations between Professional and Non-Professional Voice Users with Voice Disorders by Severity and Type

김재옥
한국음성학회 (The Korean Society of Speech Sciences)|2015.12|말소리와 음성과학 (Phonetics and Speech Sciences)|제7권 제4호|pp. 67-76|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2015.7.4.067

2

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

voice disordersprofessional voice userself-reporting voice evaluationKorean-Voice Handicap Index (K-VHI)Korean-Voice Related Quality of Life (K-VRQOL)
주제분류학제간연구

초록

The purpose of this study was to compare professional (Pro) and non-professional (Non-pro) voice users with voice disorders in self-reporting voice evaluation using Korean-Voice Handicap Index (K-VHI) and Korean-Voice Related Quality of Life (K-VRQOL). In addition, those were compared by voice quality and voice disorder type. 94 Pro and 106 Non-pro were asked to fill out the K-VHI and K-VRQOL, perceptually evaluated on GRBAS scales, and divided into three types of voice disorders (functional, organic and neurologic) by an experienced speech-language pathologist and an otolaryngologist. The results showed that the functional (F) and physical (P) scores of K-VHI in Pro group were significantly higher than those in Non-pro group. As the voice quality evaluated by G scale got worse, the scores of all aspects except emotional (E) of K-VHI and social-emotional (SE) of K-VRQOL were higher. All scores of K-VHI and K-VRQOL in neurologic voice disorders were significantly higher than those in functional and organic voice disorders. In conclusion, professional voice users are more sensitive to their functional and physical handicap resulted by their voice problems and that goes double for the patients with severe and neurologic voice disorders.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare professional (Pro) and non-professional (Non-pro) voice users with voice disorders in self-reporting voice evaluation using Korean-Voice Handicap Index (K-VHI) and Korean-Voice Related Quality of Life (K-VRQOL). In addition, those were compared by voice quality and voice disorder type. 94 Pro and 106 Non-pro were asked to fill out the K-VHI and K-VRQOL, perceptually evaluated on GRBAS scales, and divided into three types of voice disorders (functional, organic and neurologic) by an experienced speech-language pathologist and an otolaryngologist. The results showed that the functional (F) and physical (P) scores of K-VHI in Pro group were significantly higher than those in Non-pro group. As the voice quality evaluated by G scale got worse, the scores of all aspects except emotional (E) of K-VHI and social-emotional (SE) of K-VRQOL were higher. All scores of K-VHI and K-VRQOL in neurologic voice disorders were significantly higher than those in functional and organic voice disorders. In conclusion, professional voice users are more sensitive to their functional and physical handicap resulted by their voice problems and that goes double for the patients with severe and neurologic voice disorders.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. "What are voice disorders and who gets them?" (2003)[URL]
  2. Koufman, J. A., "The spectrum of vocal dysfunction", Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 24(5), pp.985~988 (1991)
  3. 표화영, "직업적 음성사용인의 음성문제에 대한 질적 연구(1): 음성사용 실태와 음성평가", Communication Sciences and Disorders, 16(3), pp.346~359 (2011), 한국언어청각임상학회
  4. Niebudek-Bogusz, E., "Correlation between acoustic parameters and Voice Handicap Index in dysphonic teachers", Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 62(1-2), pp.55~60 (2010)
  5. 이은정, "직업적 음성사용자의 음성증상 및 ‘음성건강’관련 서비스 인지도 조사", 디지털융복합연구, 13(1), pp.397~405 (2015), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
  6. Franco, R. A., "Common diagnoses and treatments in professional voice users", Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 40(5), pp.1025~1061 (2007)
  7. Guss, J., "Dysphonia in performers : Towards a clinical definition of larynoglogy of the performing voice", Journal of Voice, 28(3), pp.349~355 (2014)
  8. Wingate, J. M., "Treatment outcomes for professional voice users", Journal of Voice, 21(4), pp.433~449 (2007)
  9. Sampaio, M. C., "Vocal effort and voice handicap among teachers", Journal of Voice, 26(6), pp.820.e15~820.e18 (2012)
  10. Steen, I. N., "Optimizing outcome assessment of voice intervention, II : Sensitivity to change of self-reported and observer-rated measures", Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 122, pp.46~51 (2008)
  11. 김재옥, "평가자의 청지각적 음성평가와 대상자의 주관적 음성평가 비교", Communication Sciences and Disorders, 14(2), pp.223~235 (2009), 한국언어청각임상학회
  12. 김재옥, "전문직 음성사용자의 주관적 음성평가도구간의 비교", 제 81회 대한이비인후과학회 학술대회 논문집, pp.166~ (2007)
  13. Castelblanco, L., "Singing Voice Handicap and videostrobolaryngoscopy in healthy professional singers", Journal of Voice, 28(5), pp.608~613 (2014)
  14. Cohen, S. M., "Creation and validation of the Singing Voice Handicap Index", The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 116(6), pp.402~406 (2007)
  15. Dassie-Liete, A. P., "Vocal self-assessment : relation with the type of instrument, gender, age, and profession in individuals without vocal complaints", Codas, 26(6), pp.531~534 (2014)
  16. Maertens, K., "The voice handicap index as a tool for assesment of the biopsychosocial impact of voice problems", B-ENT, 3(2), pp.61~66 (2008)
  17. Martinello, J. G., "Psychometric assessments of life quality and voice for teachers within the municipal system in Bauru, SP, Brazi", Journal of Applied Oral Science, 19(6), pp.573~578 (2011)
  18. Niebudek-Bougusz, E., "Correlation between acoustic parameters and voice handicap index in dysphonic teachers", Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 62, pp.55~60 (2010)
  19. Thomas, G., "The voice handicap of student-teachers and risk factors perceived to have a negative influence on the voice", Journal of Voice, 21(3), pp.325~336 (2007)
  20. Timmermans, B., "Poor voice quality in future elite vocal performers and professional voice users", Journal of Voice, 16(3), pp.372~382 (2002)
  21. Salturk, Z., "Psychological effects of dysphonic in voice professionals", The Laryngoscope, 17 (2015)[DOI]
  22. Van Houtte, E., "The impact of voice disorders among teachers : Vocal complaints, treatment-seeking behavior, knowledge of vocal care, and voice-related absenteeism", Journal of Voice, 25(5), pp.570~575 (2011)
  23. Watson, N. A., "A comparison of the voice handicap index-10 scores between medical and musical theater students", Journal of Voice, 27(1), pp.129.e21~129.e23 (2013)
  24. 송윤경, "언어치료사의 음성증상 및 한국어판 음성장애지수에 대한 예비연구", 말소리와 음성과학, 2(2), pp.123~133 (2010), 한국음성학회
  25. 홍주혜, "교사 및 성악가의 VHI, V-RQOL, 음향학적 특성 비교", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 13(7), pp.3048~3056 (2012), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
  26. Marie, B. S., "Jourdanian teachers' perceptions of voice handicap", Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology, 39(2), pp.81~86 (2014)
  27. Paoliello, K., "Singing voice handicap mapped by different self-assessment instruments", Codas, 25(5), pp.463~468 (2013)
  28. 유재연, "음성과 음성치료" (2014), 시그마프레스
  29. Hirano, M., "Clinical examination of voice" (1981), Springer-Verlag
  30. Jacobson, B. H., "The voice handicap index(VHI) : Development and validation", American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 6, pp.66~70 (1997)
  31. Hogikyan, N. D., "Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life(VRQOL)", Journal of Voice, 13(4), pp.557~569 (1999)
  32. 김재옥, "한국어판 음성장애지수와 음성관련 삶의 질의 타당도 및 신뢰도 연구", 음성과학, 14(3), pp.111~125 (2007), 한국음성과학회
  33. Behlau, M., "Epidemiology of voice disorders in teachers and nonteachers in Brazil : prevalence and adverse effects", Journal of Voice, 26(5), pp.9~18 (2012)
  34. Houtte, E. V., "The impact of voice disorders among teachers : Vocal complaints, treatment-seeking behavior, knowledge of vocal care, and voice-related absenteeism", Journal of Voice, 25(5), pp.570~575 (2011)
  36. Ohlsson, A. C., "Voice Disorders in Teacher Students-A Prospective Study and a Randomized Controlled Trial", Journal of Voice (2015)[DOI]
  37. Guzman, M., "Laryngoscopic, acoustic, perceptual, and functional assessment of voice in rock singers", Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 65(5), pp.248~256 (2013)
  38. Rosen, C. A., "Voice Handicap Index in singers", Journal of Voice, 14(3), pp.370~377 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

음성장애인의 자가음성평가와 정상음성인의 청자음성평가 특성 비교이유진, 황영진한국음성학회 · 말소리와 음성과학2012 · 제4권 제2호음성장애 관련 자기보고식 평가도구의 최신 동향표화영한국청각언어재활학회 · Audiology and Speech Research2019 · 제15권 제3호음성장애 주관적 평가와 객관적 평가 간의 상관성 연구김소연, 이옥분한국음성학회 · 말소리와 음성과학2011 · 제3권 제3호노인 음성장애 출현율 및 음성장애지수 특성송윤경한국음성학회 · 말소리와 음성과학2012 · 제4권 제3호언어치료사의 음성증상 및 한국어판 음성장애지수에 대한 예비연구송윤경, 표화영한국음성학회 · 말소리와 음성과학2010 · 제2권 제2호음성장애환자 대상 음성피로와 음성평가 간 상관 및 음성피로도 설문(Voice Fatigue Index)의 임상적용강영애, 구본석, 장재원대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2017 · 제60권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)

Deep Neural Network 언어모델을 위한 Continuous Word Vector 기반의 입력 차원 감소김지환, 이동현, 임민규, 김광호pp. 3-9깊은 신경망 특징 기반 화자 검증 시스템의 성능 비교성우경, 김홍국, 김대현pp. 9-16분리행렬의 가중 내적 제한조건을 이용한 FDICA 알고리즘의 수렴속도 향상전성일, 배건성pp. 17-25깊은 신경망을 이용한 오디오 이벤트 분류임민규, 이동현, 김광호, 김지환pp. 27-33음성 주파수 분포 분석을 통한 편집 의심 지점 검출 방법양일호, 유하진, 소병민, 허희수pp. 35-40
원문 보기