본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

표준사망비를 활용한 우리나라 소지역별 건강불평등 비교

Comparisons of Health Inequalities in Small Areas with Using the Standardized Mortality Ratios in Korea

윤태호|김지현
대한예방의학회 (The Korean Society For Preventive Medicine)|2008.09|예방의학회지 (Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health)|제41권 제5호|pp. 300-306

1

조회

0

다운로드

22

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Public healthMortalityGeographic area
주제분류예방의학/직업환경의학

초록

Objectives : This study was performed to compare the standardized mortality ratios among different small areas and to explore the usefulness of standardized mortality ratios in South Korea. Methods : To calculate the standardized mortality ratio (SMR), we obtained the national deaths certificate data (2004-2006) and national registration population data (2003- 2006), and these were provided by the National Statistical Office. The small areas (Eup.Myoun.Dong) were based on the subdivisions of counties. Among the 3,580 small areas classified by the National Statistical Office, 3,571 areas were included in this study. The basic statistics and decile distributions of the SMRs for all the regional levels were calculated, and the small area maps were also produced for some selected regions. To evaluate the precision of SMR, we calculated the 95% confidence intervals of the SMR in selected small areas. Results : The mean and the standard deviation of the SMRs among all small areas were 100.8 and 17.0, respectively. The range was 30.6-211.7 and the inter-quartile range was 20.7. Seoul metropolitan city displayed the lowest mean SMR among 16 regions in South Korea, and 34.6 percent of the small area SMRs belonged to the first decile(the lowest group). On the contrary, the mean SMR of Gyeongsangnam province was highest, and 26.1 percent of the small area SMRs belonged to the tenth decile(the highest group). In some areas, the precision of the SMR, which was calculated by the 95% confidence intervals, remained questionable, yet it was quite stable for almost areas. Conclusions : The standardized mortality ratios can be useful for allocating health resources at the small area level in Korea.

Abstract

Objectives : This study was performed to compare the standardized mortality ratios among different small areas and to explore the usefulness of standardized mortality ratios in South Korea. Methods : To calculate the standardized mortality ratio (SMR), we obtained the national deaths certificate data (2004-2006) and national registration population data (2003- 2006), and these were provided by the National Statistical Office. The small areas (Eup.Myoun.Dong) were based on the subdivisions of counties. Among the 3,580 small areas classified by the National Statistical Office, 3,571 areas were included in this study. The basic statistics and decile distributions of the SMRs for all the regional levels were calculated, and the small area maps were also produced for some selected regions. To evaluate the precision of SMR, we calculated the 95% confidence intervals of the SMR in selected small areas. Results : The mean and the standard deviation of the SMRs among all small areas were 100.8 and 17.0, respectively. The range was 30.6-211.7 and the inter-quartile range was 20.7. Seoul metropolitan city displayed the lowest mean SMR among 16 regions in South Korea, and 34.6 percent of the small area SMRs belonged to the first decile(the lowest group). On the contrary, the mean SMR of Gyeongsangnam province was highest, and 26.1 percent of the small area SMRs belonged to the tenth decile(the highest group). In some areas, the precision of the SMR, which was calculated by the 95% confidence intervals, remained questionable, yet it was quite stable for almost areas. Conclusions : The standardized mortality ratios can be useful for allocating health resources at the small area level in Korea.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. General Register Office, "England and Wales 1951, Part Ì. Occupational Mortality" (1958), HMSO
  2. Yule GU, "On some points relating to the vital statistics of occupational mortality", J R Statist Soc, 97(1), pp.1~84 (1934)
  3. Julious SA, "Why do we continue to use standardized mortality ratios for small area comparisons?", J Pub Health Med, 23(1), pp.40~46 (2001)
  4. Rothman KJ, "Modern epidemiology" (1998), Lippincott-Raven
  5. Gordis L, "Epidemiology" (2004), Elsevier Saunders
  6. Black D, "The Black report in:Inequalities in Health", pp.202~ (1992), Penguin Books
  7. 정백근, "우리나라에서의 지역의 물질적 결핍수준과 15-64세 인구 표준화사망비의 관계", 예방의학회지, 39(1), pp.46~52 (2006), 대한예방의학회
  8. Kim HK, "A SMR study of Korean public servants", J Prev Med Public Health, 30(2), pp.293~307 (1997)
  9. 신유철, "통계청 사망 자료를 이용한 우리나라 의사들의 사망률에 관한 연구 1992-2002", 예방의학회지, 38(1), pp.38~44 (2005), 대한예방의학회
  10. "statistical standards"[URL]
  11. Vandenbroucke JP, "A shortcut method for calculating the 95 percent confidence interval of the standardized mortality ratio", Am J Epidemiol, 115(2), pp.303~304 (1982)
  12. "Annual report of life table statistics 2005"[URL]
  13. "Annual Report of Births and Deaths Statistics 2005/URL:"[URL]
  14. Janes GR, "Descriptive epidemiology: analysing and interpreting surveillance data in:Principles and Practice of Public Health Surveillance", pp.112~167 (1994), Oxford University Press
  15. Checkoway H, "Research Methods in Occupational Epidemiology" (1989), Oxford University Press
  16. Hennekens CH, "Epidemiology in Medicine" (1987), Little Brown & Company
  17. Goldman DA, "Are standardized mortality ratios valid for public health data analysis?", Stat Med, 19(8), pp.1081~1088 (2000)
  18. "Standardized Mortality Ratios for Wards in England and Wlaes, 1999-2003: Results for those aged under 85 for males, females and all persons"[URL]
  19. Carstairs V, "Deprivation and mortality: An alternative to social class?", Community Med, 11(3), pp.210~219 (1989)
  20. Raleigh VS, "Life expectancy in England: Variations and trends by gender, health authority, and level of deprivation", J Epidemiol Community Health, 51(6), pp.649~658 (1997)
  21. Woods LM, "Geographical variation in life expectancy at birth in England and Wales is largely explained by deprivation", J Epidemiol Community Health, 59(2), pp.115~120 (2005)
  22. Williams ES, "Impact of nursing home deaths on life expectancy calculations in small areas", J Epidemiol Community Health, 58(11), pp.958~962 (2004)
  23. Mays N, "Relation between all cause standardised mortality ratios and two indices of deprivation at regional and district level in England", J Epidemiol Community Health, 43(2), pp.191~199 (1989)
  24. Townsend P, "Individual or social responsibility for premature death? Current controversies in the British debate about health", Int J Health Serv, 20(3), pp.373~392 (1990)

관련 논문AI추천

표준화사망비와 지역결핍지수의 상관관계: 지역사회 통합결핍지수 개발신호성, 이수형, 추장민대한예방의학회 · 예방의학회지2009 · 제42권 제6호Deprivation and Mortality at the Town Level in Busan, Korea: An Ecological Study김명희, 김창훈, 윤태호, 임정훈, 정규석, 조병만, 최민혁, 황승식, 황인경대한예방의학회 · 예방의학회지2011 · 제44권 제6호시군구별 사회경제적 결핍 수준과 기대수명, 건강기대수명의 연관성김보람, 윤태호한국보건교육건강증진학회 · 보건교육건강증진학회지2017 · 제34권 제5호한국의 사망률과 지역 특성 간 연관성에 대한 공간적 변이 탐색과 함의장인수국가데이터연구원 · 통계연구2025 · 제30권 제1호우리나라에서의 지역의 물질적 결핍수준과 15-64세 인구 표준화사망비의 관계김준연, 문옥륜, 윤태호, 이용환, 정갑열, 정백근, 홍영습대한예방의학회 · 예방의학회지2006 · 제39권 제1호지역 간 건강수준 비교를 위한 표준화율 적용의 적절성 평가: 2008년 지역사회건강조사를 바탕으로김호, 강기원, 권근용, 김윤아, 박은자, 임도상, 정지선, 조성일대한예방의학회 · 예방의학회지2010 · 제43권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

우리나라 노인여성의 골다공증성 척추골절로 인한 경제적 부담 추계강혜영, 최원정, 박성은, 장영화, 양규현, 강대룡, 문성환pp. 287-2946세미만 입원 법정 본인부담금 면제정책이 의료이용에 미치는 영향윤석준, 전경수, 안형식, 신현웅, 윤영혜, 경민호, 황세민pp. 295-299평택시 군용비행장 주변지역 주민건강조사임명호, 노상철, 구미진, 김현주, 백기청, 정재윤, 김혜영, 이무용, 권호장, 김창훈, 김동현, 임정훈pp. 307-314의료소비자, 서비스 및 시장 특성요인과 고객충성도와의 관계 분석 -1개 중소도시의 의료이용 경험자를 대상으로-김현미, 김주혜, 하귀염, 이선희pp. 315-322The Effects of Actual and Perceived Body Weight on Unhealthy Weight Control Behaviors and Depressed Mood among Adult Women in Seoul, Korea조성일, 김동식, 김현순, 조영태pp. 323-330
원문 보기