본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국의사의 정부신뢰 관련 요인 분석: 의사단체들의 일부 임원의사들을 중심으로

A Study of Factors Related to Korean Physicians’ Trust in the Government: On the Target for Board Members of Physicians’ Associations

양건모|서주현|김주혜|이선희
대한예방의학회 (The Korean Society For Preventive Medicine)|2010.09|예방의학회지 (Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health)|제43권 제5호|pp. 411-422

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

PhysiciansPolicy makingTrust in the government
주제분류예방의학/직업환경의학

초록

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the factors related to Korean physicians’ trust in the government. Methods: We used structured questionnaires that were composed of multidimensional scales for each of the various categories. Results: The recognition levels of trust of the government by Korean physicians were not high, and they ranged from 3.6 to 4.8for ten scales. The factors related to trust in the government were categorized into seven factors on the basis of a factor analysis. On the regression analysis, a positive relationship was found between “the individual propensity to trust” and trust in the government, while a negative relationship was found between “the recognition level regarding the government as an authoritarian power” and trust in the government. “Confidence about participation in the policy process” as internal efficacy and “belief in governmental ability and motivation toward public demand” as external efficacy also showed a strong positive relationship with trust in the government. Conclusions: From these results, we can draw the conclusion that making efforts to improve the recognition level of trust in the government among physicians is an important policy task. To increase the trust level, participation of physicians in the policy process in various ways and open communication between the physicians’associations and the government should be facilitated.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the factors related to Korean physicians’ trust in the government. Methods: We used structured questionnaires that were composed of multidimensional scales for each of the various categories. Results: The recognition levels of trust of the government by Korean physicians were not high, and they ranged from 3.6 to 4.8for ten scales. The factors related to trust in the government were categorized into seven factors on the basis of a factor analysis. On the regression analysis, a positive relationship was found between “the individual propensity to trust” and trust in the government, while a negative relationship was found between “the recognition level regarding the government as an authoritarian power” and trust in the government. “Confidence about participation in the policy process” as internal efficacy and “belief in governmental ability and motivation toward public demand” as external efficacy also showed a strong positive relationship with trust in the government. Conclusions: From these results, we can draw the conclusion that making efforts to improve the recognition level of trust in the government among physicians is an important policy task. To increase the trust level, participation of physicians in the policy process in various ways and open communication between the physicians’associations and the government should be facilitated.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Brehm J, "Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital", Am J Polit Sci, 41(3), pp.999~1023 (1997)
  2. Gamson WA, "Power and Discontent" (1968), Dorsey Press
  3. Easton D, "A Systems Analysis of Political Life", pp.278~ (1979), Jone Wiley & Sons
  4. Scholz JT, "Trust, taxes, and compliance. In: Trust and Governance" (1996), Russell Sage Foundation Publications
  5. "Seoul National University", 1989
  6. 김왕배, "사회자본으로서의 신뢰와 조직몰입", 한국사회학, 36(3), pp.1~23 (2002), 한국사회학회
  7. Roy JL, "Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In: Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research", pp.114~139 (1996), Sage Publications, Inc
  8. Zucker LG, "Production of trust; institutional sources of economic structure 1840-1920. In Research In Organizational Behavior", pp.53~111 (1920), JAI Press
  9. Debra LS, "Business on a handshake", Negot J, 8(4), pp.365~377 (1992)
  10. Richard JT, "Effective support an empirical examiniation", Comp Polit Stud, 7(4), pp.395~429 (1975)
  11. Yamagishi T, "Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan", Motiv Emot, 18(2), pp.129~166 (1994)
  12. Muller EN, "Democratic and aggressive political participation: estimation of a nonrecursive model", Polit Behav, 6(2), pp.129~146 (1984)
  13. Cole RL, "Toward a model of political traust: a causual analysis", Am J Polit Sci, 17(4), pp.809~817 (1973)
  14. 전진석, "의약분업 정책변화에 대한 연구: 정책옹호연합 모형을 적용하여", 한국정책학회보, 12(2), pp.59~88 (2003), 한국정책학회
  15. "The gap between medical community and government. Dong-A Newspaper; 2003. Seoul"[URL]
  16. Dasgupta, Partha, "Trust as a commodity. In: Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relation", pp.49~72 (1988), Basil Blackwell
  17. Lee HS, "The public trust in civil servants of Korea", Korean Public Admin Rev, 33(2), pp.37~56 (1999)
  18. Whitener EN, "Managers as initiators of trust: an exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior", Acad Manag Rev, 23(3), pp.513~530 (1998)
  19. Bigley GA, "Straining for shared meaning in organization science: problems of trust and distrust", Acad Manag Rev, 23(3), pp.405~421 (1998)
  20. Craig SC, "Political efficacy and trust: a report on the NES pilot study items", Polit Behav, 12(3), pp.289~314 (1990)
  21. Kim HJ, "Trust and organizational commitment", Korean Public Admin Rev, 33(2), pp.19~35 (1999)
  22. "World Value Survey 2000. Methodological questionnaire; USA"[URL]
  23. Kumar N, "SteenKamp Jan-Benedict EM. The effect of percieved interdependence on dealer attitudes", J Market Res, 32(3), pp.348~356 (1995)
  24. King C, "Government is Us: the citizen government connection", PA Times, 21(4), pp.1~ (1998)
  25. Levi M, "A state of trust. In Trust and Governance" (1998), Russell Sage Foundation Publications
  26. Maloney W, "Social capital and urban governance: adding a more contextualized ‘top- down’ perspective", Polit Stud, 48(4), pp.802~820 (2000)
  27. "Annual Pilot Study Reports 1987. USA: A Collaboration of Stanford University and the University of Michigan; 1987"[URL]
  28. Jung JK, "Theories of Public Administration" (1997), Dae Myung
  29. Stolle D, "Are all associations alike? Member diversity, associatonal type, and the creation of social capital", Am Behav Sci, 42(1), pp.47~65 (1998)
  30. 박희봉, "우리나라 정부신뢰 특성 및 영향 요인 분석", 한국행정학보, 37(3), pp.45~66 (2003), 한국행정학회
  31. "The National Political Study 2004. USA:center for political studies ; 2004"[URL]
  32. "Why don't American trust the government?; 1996. USA"[URL]
  33. Bae BR, "The origins and consequences of distrust in government", Korean Public Admin Rev, 22(2), pp.393~427 (1998)
  34. Almond GA, "The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations" (1963), Princeton University Press
  35. 장수찬, "한국사회에 나타난 악순환의 사이클: 결사체 참여(civic engagement), 사회자본(social sapital), 그리고 정부신뢰(confidence in political institutions)", 한국정치학회보, 36(1), pp.87~112 (2002), 한국정치학회
  36. Park CO, "Interest group influence on bureaucracy in Korea", Korean Public Admin Rev, 33(1), pp.239~259 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

한국 의사의 보건의료체계 및 보건의료정책에 대한 인식과 영향 요인김영수, 박보현, 신경수한국보건경제정책학회 · 보건경제와 정책연구2025 · 제31권 제4호정부에 대한 신뢰의 사회적 결정요인: 국민-정부간 소통의 조절효과 분석김기동, 남태우정부혁신연구소 · 정부행정2018 · 제14권 의료서비스 만족도, 보건의료체계 만족도와 신뢰이근찬한국보건경제정책학회 · 보건경제와 정책연구2023 · 제29권 제3호의사의 전문직업성에 대한 인식이 직업만족도에 미치는 영향김계현, 이정찬대한의료커뮤니케이션학회 · 의료커뮤니케이션2021 · 제16권 제2호일반신뢰와 정부신뢰가 뇌사 후 장기 기증에 미치는 영향이수인한국보건정보통계학회 · 보건정보통계학회지2018 · 제43권 제3호사회참여에 관한 의과대학생의 인식 조사와 의학교육의 방향권오영, 박소연, 윤태영, 이송이, 장동호연세대학교 의과대학 · 의학교육논단2018 · 제20권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

Body Weight at Birth and at Age Three and Respiratory Illness in Preschool ChildrenHwa Young Lee, 정율원, 이진화, 정최경희, 박혜숙, 박은애, 김영주, 하은희, 오세영pp. 369-376Blood Mercury Concentration and Related Factors in an Urban Coastal Area in Korea조은미, 김병권, 김준연, 김유미, 유승도, 홍영습, 유장훈pp. 377-386Physical and Mental Health of Disaster Victims: A Comparative Study on Typhoon and Oil Spill Disasters정순둘, 김은정pp. 387-395Validity of Self-Reported Height, Weight, and Body Mass Index of the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-Based Survey Questionnaire김종연, 박순우, 정효지, 권경남, 김윤정, 배지석pp. 396-402Test-Retest Reliability of a Questionnaire for the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-Based Survey박순우, 김영택, 권경남, 정효지, 배지석, 김종연pp. 403-410
원문 보기