Development and Validation of a Novel Generic Health-related Quality of Life Instrument With 20 Items (HINT-20)
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: Few attempts have been made to develop a generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument and to examine its validity and reliability in Korea. We aimed to do this in our present study. Methods: After a literature review of existing generic HRQoL instruments, a focus group discussion, in-depth interviews, and expert consultations, we selected 30 tentative items for a new HRQoL measure. These items were evaluated by assessing their ceiling effects, difficulty, and redundancy in the first survey. To validate the HRQoL instrument that was developed, known-groups validity and convergent/discriminant validity were evaluated and its test-retest reliability was examined in the second survey. Results: Of the 30 items originally assessed for the HRQoL instrument, four were excluded due to high ceiling effects and six were removed due to redundancy. We ultimately developed a HRQoL instrument with a reduced number of 20 items, known as the Health-related Quality of Life Instrument with 20 items (HINT-20), incorporating physical, mental, social, and positive health dimensions. The results of the HINT-20 for known-groups validity were poorer in women, the elderly, and those with a low income. For convergent/discriminant validity, the correlation coefficients of items (except vitality) in the physical health dimension with the physical component summary of the Short Form 36 version 2 (SF-36v2) were generally higher than the correlations of those items with the mental component summary of the SF-36v2, and vice versa. Regarding test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient of the total HINT-20 score was 0.813 (p<0.001). Conclusions: A novel generic HRQoL instrument, the HINT-20, was developed for the Korean general population and showed acceptable validity and reliability.
Abstract
Objectives: Few attempts have been made to develop a generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument and to examine its validity and reliability in Korea. We aimed to do this in our present study. Methods: After a literature review of existing generic HRQoL instruments, a focus group discussion, in-depth interviews, and expert consultations, we selected 30 tentative items for a new HRQoL measure. These items were evaluated by assessing their ceiling effects, difficulty, and redundancy in the first survey. To validate the HRQoL instrument that was developed, known-groups validity and convergent/discriminant validity were evaluated and its test-retest reliability was examined in the second survey. Results: Of the 30 items originally assessed for the HRQoL instrument, four were excluded due to high ceiling effects and six were removed due to redundancy. We ultimately developed a HRQoL instrument with a reduced number of 20 items, known as the Health-related Quality of Life Instrument with 20 items (HINT-20), incorporating physical, mental, social, and positive health dimensions. The results of the HINT-20 for known-groups validity were poorer in women, the elderly, and those with a low income. For convergent/discriminant validity, the correlation coefficients of items (except vitality) in the physical health dimension with the physical component summary of the Short Form 36 version 2 (SF-36v2) were generally higher than the correlations of those items with the mental component summary of the SF-36v2, and vice versa. Regarding test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient of the total HINT-20 score was 0.813 (p<0.001). Conclusions: A novel generic HRQoL instrument, the HINT-20, was developed for the Korean general population and showed acceptable validity and reliability.
참고문헌 (40)
- Rodríguez-Artalejo F, "Health-related quality of life as a predictor of hospital readmission and death among patients with heart failure", Arch Intern Med, 165(11), pp.1274~1279 (2005)
- Otero-Rodríguez A, "Change in health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality in the older adults", Qual Life Res, 19(1), pp.15~23 (2010)
- van Nooten F, "Health economics and outcomes research within drug development: challenges and opportunities for reimbursement and market access within biopharma research", Drug Discov Today, 17(11-12), pp.615~622 (2012)
- Gareen IF, "Impact of lung cancer screening results on participant health-related quality of life and state anxiety in the National Lung Screening Trial", Cancer, 120(21), pp.3401~3409 (2014)
- "Measuring healthy days: population assessment of health-related quality of life" (2000)[URL]
- "Everyone counts: planning for patients 2014/15 -2018/19: technical definitions for clinical commissioning groups and area teams"[URL]
- Schipper H, "Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials", pp.11~23 (1996), Lippincott-Raven
- Osoba D, "Lessons learned from measuring health-related quality of life in oncology", J Clin Oncol, 12(3), pp.608~616 (1994)
- Patrick DL, "Health status and health policy: quality of life in health care evaluation and resource allocation", pp.58~64 (1993), Oxford University Press
- "Constitution of the World Health Organization"[URL]
- Szende A, "Measuring self-reported population health : an international perspective based on EQ-5D", pp.27~30 (2004), SpringMed Publishing
- Ock M, "Measuring health related quality of life using EQ-5D in South Korea", J Health Tech Assess, 1, pp.103~111 (2013)
- Kang EJ, "A catalogue of EQ-5D utility weights for chronic diseases among noninstitutionalized community residents in Korea", Value Health, 12(Suppl 3), pp.S114~S117 (2009)
- Johnson JA, "Valuations of EQ-5D health states: are the United States and United Kingdom different?", Med Care, 43(3), pp.221~228 (2005)
- Seon Ha Kim, "Psychometric Properties of the Korean Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 for Assessing the General Population", Asian Nursing Research, 7(2), pp.61~66 (2013), 한국간호과학회
- Kim SH, "Assessment of psychometric properties of the Korean SF-12 v2 in the general population", BMC Public Health, 14, pp.1086~ (2014)
- Wu Y, "Handbook of disease burdens and quality of life measures", pp.266~283 (2010), Springer
- Yamaoka K, "A Japanese version of the questionnaire for quality of life measurement", Ann Cancer Res Ther, 3(1), pp.45~53 (1994)
- Kim SY, "The development of Korean health related quality of life scale (KQUOLS): testing reliability and validity", Korean J Fam Med, 21(3), pp.382~394 (2000)
- Park HJ, "Current status of health-related quality of life research in Korea", J Korean Rheum Assoc, 9(Suppl), pp.S1~S17 (2002)
- 이현정, "건강 및 건강 관련 삶의 질에 대한 건강군과 질환군의 인식: 초점집단토의와 심층면접을 사용하여", Korean Journal of Health Promotion, 16(1), pp.55~66 (2016), 대한임상건강증진학회[DOI]
- Goursand D, "Development of a short form of the Brazilian Parental-Caregiver Perceptions Questionnaire using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis", Qual Life Res, 22(2), pp.393~402 (2013)
- Ghadi I, "Construct validity examination of critical thinking dispositions for undergraduate students in University Putra Malaysia", High Educ Stud, 2(2), pp.138~145 (2012)
- Cull A, "What do cancer patients mean when they complain of concentration and memory problems?", Br J Cancer, 74(10), pp.1674~1679 (1996)
- Curcio G, "Sleep loss, learning capacity and academic performance", Sleep Med Rev, 10(5), pp.323~337 (2006)
- "Gender equality: time use across the world"[URL]
- Alexandrova A, "Subjective well-being and Kahneman’s ‘objective happiness’", J Happiness Stud, 6(3), pp.301~324 (2005)
- Lin XJ, "Methodological issues in measuring health-related quality of life", Tzu Chi Med J, 25(1), pp.8~12 (2013)
- WHOQOL Group, "Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment", Psychol Med, 28(3), pp.551~558 (1998)
- Perneger TV, "Health and happiness in young Swiss adults", Qual Life Res, 13(1), pp.171~178 (2004)
- Sprangers MA, "Reflections on changeability versus stability of health-related quality of life: distinguishing between its environmental and genetic components", Health Qual Life Outcomes, 6, pp.89~ (2008)
- Böckerman P, "Do established health-related quality-of-life measures adequately capture the impact of chronic conditions on subjective well-being?", Health Policy, 100(1), pp.91~95 (2011)
- Tessier P, "A comparison of the clinical determinants of health-related quality of life and subjective well-being in long-term breast cancer survivors", Eur J Cancer Care (Engl), 21(5), pp.692~700 (2012)
- Robertson SM, "Positive emotional health and diabetes care: concepts, measurement, and clinical implications", Psychosomatics, 53(1), pp.1~12 (2012)
- Kozma A, "Predictors of happiness", J Gerontol, 38(5), pp.626~628 (1983)
- Wang HM, "Validation of the EQ-5D in a general population sample in urban China", Qual Life Res, 21(1), pp.155~160 (2012)
- Kontodimopoulos N, "Validity of the EuroQoL (EQ-5D) instrument in a Greek general population", Value Health, 11(7), pp.1162~1169 (2008)
- Kim TH, "Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in the general population of South Korea", Qual Life Res, 22(8), pp.2245~2253 (2013)
- Castro PC, "Convergent validity between SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF in older adults", Rev Saude Publica, 48(1), pp.63~67 (2014)