본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

교육서비스 품질이 관계관리에 미치는 영향 서비스 유통 관점에서

Effects of Education Service Quality on Relationship Management from the Service Distribution Perspective

조현진
한국유통과학회 (Korea Distribution Science Association)|2015.03|유통과학연구 (Journal of Distribution Science)|제13권 제3호|pp. 41-49|DOI 10.15722/jds.13.3.201503.41

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Education Service QualityRelationship QualityRelationship Performance

초록

Purpose – Universities are placing a greater emphasis on relationship management as a source of competitive advantage due to increasingly competitive environments and social changes. The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationships among education service quality, relationship quality, and relationship performance from the perspective of service distribution. In other words, this study is focused on the role of education service quality with regard to relationship management. In this study, education service quality is divided into lecture, job assistance, student-faculty interaction, student-student interaction, facility welfare, and scholarship welfare quality components; relationship quality is composed of satisfaction and commitment; and relationship performance is divided into recommendation and defection intentions. Research design, data, and methodology – This study aims to identify how the various elements of education service quality affect satisfaction. Further, it aims to test the relationships among satisfaction, commitment, recommendation intentions, and defection intentions. Distribution and marketing students were randomly selected for the experiment. Out of the 380 administered questionnaires, a total of 361 respondents provided complete and usable data. The sample consisted of 232 males (64.3%) and 129 females (35.7%). The variables of the proposed model were measured through assessments that were measured on a 5-point Likert scale. Using Lisrel 8.7, a structural model was analyzed and the path coefficients were estimated. Results – The overall fit of the model was acceptable (χ 2=1121.8 (df=603, P=0.00), GFI=0.967, NFI=0.974, CFI=0.981, RMR=0.021). The results generally supported the hypothesized relationships of the proposed model, except for Hypothesis 1. First, lecture, job assistance, student-faculty interaction, student- student interaction, and facility welfare quality were revealed to have positive effects on satisfaction. In particular, lecture and facility welfare quality had the strongest effects on satisfaction. However, scholarship welfare quality did not significantly affect satisfaction; this means that Hypothesis 3-2 was not supported. Second, satisfaction was positively related to commitment and recommendation intentions but it was negatively related to defection intentions. Third, commitment was positively related to recommendation intentions but it was negatively related to defection intentions. Conclusions – This study emphasizes the influence of education service quality on satisfaction in the long-term. In addition, this research has the following implications for university relationship management. First, the findings suggest that the various dimensions of education service quality have differing effects on satisfaction. In particular, lecture and facility welfare quality are found to be the most important factors in increasing the level of satisfaction. Therefore, university managers need to prioritize enhancing lecture quality and upgrading educational facilities. Second, satisfaction also improves through job assistance systems and opportunities for social interactions. Therefore, university managers should reinforce their job skills programs and should provide opportunities for social relationships to develop. Finally, it is important for university managers to take a relationship approach to maximizing relationship performance. Therefore, university managers should work to increase student recommendations and prevent their defections based on satisfaction and commitment.

Abstract

Purpose – Universities are placing a greater emphasis on relationship management as a source of competitive advantage due to increasingly competitive environments and social changes. The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationships among education service quality, relationship quality, and relationship performance from the perspective of service distribution. In other words, this study is focused on the role of education service quality with regard to relationship management. In this study, education service quality is divided into lecture, job assistance, student-faculty interaction, student-student interaction, facility welfare, and scholarship welfare quality components; relationship quality is composed of satisfaction and commitment; and relationship performance is divided into recommendation and defection intentions. Research design, data, and methodology – This study aims to identify how the various elements of education service quality affect satisfaction. Further, it aims to test the relationships among satisfaction, commitment, recommendation intentions, and defection intentions. Distribution and marketing students were randomly selected for the experiment. Out of the 380 administered questionnaires, a total of 361 respondents provided complete and usable data. The sample consisted of 232 males (64.3%) and 129 females (35.7%). The variables of the proposed model were measured through assessments that were measured on a 5-point Likert scale. Using Lisrel 8.7, a structural model was analyzed and the path coefficients were estimated. Results – The overall fit of the model was acceptable (χ 2=1121.8 (df=603, P=0.00), GFI=0.967, NFI=0.974, CFI=0.981, RMR=0.021). The results generally supported the hypothesized relationships of the proposed model, except for Hypothesis 1. First, lecture, job assistance, student-faculty interaction, student- student interaction, and facility welfare quality were revealed to have positive effects on satisfaction. In particular, lecture and facility welfare quality had the strongest effects on satisfaction. However, scholarship welfare quality did not significantly affect satisfaction; this means that Hypothesis 3-2 was not supported. Second, satisfaction was positively related to commitment and recommendation intentions but it was negatively related to defection intentions. Third, commitment was positively related to recommendation intentions but it was negatively related to defection intentions. Conclusions – This study emphasizes the influence of education service quality on satisfaction in the long-term. In addition, this research has the following implications for university relationship management. First, the findings suggest that the various dimensions of education service quality have differing effects on satisfaction. In particular, lecture and facility welfare quality are found to be the most important factors in increasing the level of satisfaction. Therefore, university managers need to prioritize enhancing lecture quality and upgrading educational facilities. Second, satisfaction also improves through job assistance systems and opportunities for social interactions. Therefore, university managers should reinforce their job skills programs and should provide opportunities for social relationships to develop. Finally, it is important for university managers to take a relationship approach to maximizing relationship performance. Therefore, university managers should work to increase student recommendations and prevent their defections based on satisfaction and commitment.

참고문헌 (51)

  1. Abdullah, F., "The Development of HEdPERF : A New Measuring Instrument of Service Quality for the Higher Education Sector", International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6), pp.569~581 (2006)
  2. Anderson, E. W., "Customer Satisfaction, Market Share and Profitability : Findings From Sweden", Journal of Marketing, 58(2), pp.53~66 (1994)
  3. Anderson, J. C., "Structural Equation Modeling in Practice : A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach", Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), pp.411~423 (1988)
  4. Astin, A., "What matters in colleges? four critical years revisited" (1993), Jossey-Bass
  5. Bettencourt, L. A., "Customer Voluntary Performance : Customer as Partners in Service Delivery", Journal of Retailing, 73(3), pp.383~406 (1997)
  6. Bolton, R. N., "A Dynamic Model of Customers' Usage of Services : Usage as an Antecedent and Consequence of Satisfaction", Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), pp.171~186 (1999)
  7. Brady, M. K., "Some New Thoughts on Conceptualizing Perceived Service Quality : A Hierarchical Approach", Journal of Marketing, 65(3), pp.34~49 (2001)
  8. 장대성, "한국 대학 경영교육 서비스의 교육만족 및 충성도와 서비스접점 유형에 관한 연구", 대한경영학회지, 23(2), pp.813~831 (2010), 대한경영학회
  9. 조호현, "대학교육시스템에서 교육서비스과정 품질과 교육성과품질간 관계에 관한 연구", 상품학연구, 25(3), pp.61~72 (2007), 한국상품학회
  10. 조현진, "서비스 품질이 쇼핑가치와 재이용의도에 미치는 영향:커피전문점을 중심으로", 유통과학연구, 10(4), pp.21~28 (2012), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  11. 조현진, "미용 서비스 산업에서 관계적 요인이 추천의도에 미치는 영향", 경영교육연구, 27(3), pp.189~207 (2012), 한국경영교육학회[DOI]
  12. Elliott, K. M., "Student Satisfaction : An Alternative Approach to Assessing This Important Concept", Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(2), pp.197~209 (2002)
  13. Fullerton, G., "When does Commitment Lead to Loyalty?", Journal of Service Research, 5(4), pp.333~344 (2003)
  14. Fullerton, G., "The Service Quality-Loyalty Relationship in Retail Services: Does Commitment Matter?", Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 12(2), pp.99~111 (2005)
  15. Fullerton, G., "Creating Advocates: The Roles of Satisfaction, Trust and Commitment", Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18(1), pp.92~100 (2011)
  16. Garbarino, E., "The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust, and Commitment in Customer Relationships", Journal of Marketing, 63(2), pp.70~87 (1999)
  17. Geyskens, I., "A Meta-Analysis of Satisfaction in Marketing Channel Relationships", Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), pp.223~238 (1999)
  18. Gundlach, G. T., "The Structure of Commitment in Exchange", Journal of Marketing, 59, pp.78~92 (1995)
  19. Harrison-Walker, L. J., "The Measurement of Word-of-Mouth Communication and an Investigation of Service Quality and Customer Commitment as Potential Antecedents", Journal of Service Research, 4(1), pp.60~75 (2001)
  20. Helgesen, Ø., "What Accounts for Students'Loyalty? Some Field Study Evidence", International Journal of Educational Management, 21(2), pp.126~143 (2007)
  21. Hennig-Thurau, T., "Modelling and Managing Student Loyalty : An Approach Based on the Concept of Relationship Quality", Journal of Service Research, 3(1), pp.331~344 (2001)
  22. 홍성헌, "교육서비스수출 촉진을 위한 한국 대학교육 평가요인에 관한 연구: 중국인 유학생 관점에서", 통상정보연구, 13(4), pp.461~482 (2011), 한국통상정보학회
  23. 황희중, "교육서비스 품질이 교육서비스 재구매의도에 미치는 영향 - 교육서비스 가격공정성의 매개효과를 중심으로 -", 대한경영학회지, 25(1), pp.1~19 (2012), 대한경영학회
  24. 황현주, "대학 서비스 질 측정에 관한 연구 (학생 재등록 의도와의 관계를 중심으로)", 한국교육, 31(1), pp.385~419 (2004), 한국교육개발원
  25. Jang, Gui-Kyung, "Chinese Students' Evaluations on the Education Service Quality of Korean Higher Education Institutions", Journal of Decision Science, 18(1), pp.21~40 (2010)
  26. 강만수, "대학교육기관의 교육서비스품질이 학생만족, 신뢰, 몰입과 학생충성도에 미치는 영향", 고객만족경영연구, 13(1), pp.129~149 (2011), 한국고객만족경영학회
  27. 김현철, "교육서비스의 기능적, 기술적 품질요인과 고객 충성도 간의 관계에서 교육몰입의 조절효과", 경영교육연구, 28(6), pp.575~598 (2013), 한국경영교육학회
  28. 김인숙, "대학생활만족도에 관한 집단 간 비교연구: 수도권 대학 비수도권 대학을 중심으로", 교육종합연구, 8(3), pp.241~260 (2010), 교육종합연구소
  29. 김성식, "대학생들의 학업중단 및 학교이동에 대한 탐색적 분석 : 대학선택요인과 대학생활 만족도의 영향", 한국교육, 35(1), pp.227~249 (2008), 한국교육개발원
  30. 고장완, "대학생의 학습성과와 대학특성 및 학습과정 변인 간의 구조적 관계 분석", 한국교육, 41(1), pp.167~195 (2014), 한국교육개발원
  31. 이봉수, "무역학 교육 서비스 품질 측정 도구 개발", 무역학회지, 35(1), pp.77~101 (2010), 한국무역학회
  32. 이혜미, "교육서비스품질이 학생만족, 추천 및 구전의도에 미치는 영향 연구-서울지역대학 외국인 유학생을 대상으로-", 관광연구저널, 27(3), pp.55~76 (2013), 한국관광연구학회
  33. 이형탁, "대학 서비스 만족이 대학고객 시민행동에 미치는 영향", 대한경영학회지, 26(4), pp.1011~1032 (2013), 대한경영학회
  34. 이영희, "교육서비스품질이 관계품질 및 고객애호도에 미치는 영향과학교급의 조절효과", 대한경영학회지, 27(2), pp.263~284 (2014), 대한경영학회
  35. Ministry of Education, "University Structure Reform Plan", Press Release, 29 January, ~ (2014)
  36. Moorman, C., "Factors Affecting Trust in Market Relationships", Journal of Marketing, 57(1), pp.81~101 (1993)
  37. Morgan, R. M., "The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing", Journal of Marketing, 58(3), pp.20~38 (1994)
  38. Nesset, E., "Modelling and Managing Student Loyalty: A Study of a Norwegian University College", Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(4), pp.327~345 (2009)
  39. Odekerken-Schroder, G., "The Role of the Buyer in Affecting Buyer-Seller Relationships: Empirical Studies in a Retail Context", Doctor, pp.1999
  40. Parasuraman, A., "SERVQUAL: A Multiple Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of the Service Quality", Journal of Retailing, 64(1), pp.12~40 (1988)
  41. Pollack, B. L., "Linking the Hierarchical Service Quality Model to Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty", Journal of Services Marketing, 23(1), pp.42~50 (2009)
  42. Price, L., "Commercial Friendship:Service Provider-Client Relationships in Context", Journal of Marketing, 63, pp.38~56 (1999)
  43. Reichheld, F. F., "The One Number You Need to Grow", Harvard Business Review, 81, pp.2~10 (2003)
  44. Sheth, J., "Relationship Marketing in Consumer Markets : Antecedents and Consequences", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), pp.255~271 (1995)
  45. 신소영, "대학 교육만족도 측정도구 개발 및 타당화 연구", 교육과학연구, 44(3), pp.107~132 (2013), 교육과학연구소
  46. Sweeney, J., "The Effects of Brand Credibility on Customer Loyalty", Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 15(3), pp.179~193 (2008)
  47. Verhoef, P. C., "The Effect of Relational Constructs on Customer Referrals and Number of Services Purchased From a Multiservice Provider : Does Age of Relationship Matter?", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), pp.202~216 (2002)
  48. 이유재, "서비스품질 연구에 관한 종합적 고찰: 최근 10년(2004∼2013)의 연구를 중심으로", 마케팅관리연구, 19(2), pp.1~43 (2014), 한국마케팅관리학회
  49. 유재갑, "대학교육서비스품질에 관한 연구: 온라인 강의와 오프라인 강의를 중심으로", 서비스경영학회지, 14(3), pp.79~104 (2013), 한국서비스경영학회
  50. Yu, G. B., "Testing the Mediating Effect of the Quality of College Life in the Student Satisfaction and Student Loyalty Relationship", Applied Research Quality Life, 3, pp.1~21 (2008)
  51. Zeelenberg, M., "Beyond Valence in Customer Dissatisfaction : A Review and New Findings on Behavioral Responses to Regret and Disappointment in Failed Services", Journal of Business Research, 57(4), pp.445~455 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

서비스 유통 관점에서 교수 신뢰성이 관계적 요인에 미치는 영향조현진한국유통과학회 · 유통과학연구2017 · 제15권 제3호대학 재학생의 서비스품질, 만족, 충성도간 관계에 관한 연구김상욱한국상품학회 · 상품학연구2018 · 제36권 제6호차별적인 교육품질이 학생만족과 학생 충성도에 미치는 영향김계수한국품질경영학회 · 품질경영학회지2013 · 제41권 제1호대학 교육서비스 만족도 향상을 위한 품질차원 및 개선우선순위 도출김도년, 장영순, 정다정한국품질경영학회 · 품질경영학회지2017 · 제45권 제1호교육서비스품질이 학생만족도 및 충성도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 -호텔관광대학학생 중심으로-채규진한국마이스관광학회 · MICE관광연구2015 · 제15권 제2호학생 만족을 위한 지역 사립대학의 교육 서비스품질 연구권도희한국품질경영학회 · 품질경영학회지2024 · 제52권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

KODISA Journals and Strategies이종호, 양회창, 김영이, 황희중, 이정완, 윤명길, 김동호pp. 5-9The Effect of Ambient Sadness on Hedonic Choice최낙환, Naranzul Tsogtbayar, Tamir Oyunbilegpp. 11-19Design Strategy Based on Designer Roles in Design-Oriented Firms: A Comparison of Hanssem and Ikea김소형pp. 21-29How VMI and Consignment Jointly Affect Supply Chain Performance유정석pp. 31-39의류 소매점의 판매촉진에 대한 소비자 태도와 구매의도황춘섭, 경문수pp. 51-60
원문 보기