본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparative Studies on Ports Management System in Northeast Countries

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose – The purpose of paper is to review and look into the process of port development of each country, and compare with their system of port management. Research design, data and methodology – The methods to be taken is to examine a process of port development in terms of historic and regulated point of views, and each country’s port is compared with various port models. Results – China has evolved of port governance into 3 stages, which has lead to almost liberalized port management system in process of privatization slogan. Japan has three stages of port development, and key commitments have been done by local government, rather than national one. Korea has also several stages of port reforms, and national government has been deeply involved in port industry, as well as regional government and port authority in certain areas. Conclusions – whatever port management system each countries has taken, it eventually aims to port productivity in country’s port. To adopt most proper port management system may be answer for country to cope with environmental changes around port industry.

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of paper is to review and look into the process of port development of each country, and compare with their system of port management. Research design, data and methodology – The methods to be taken is to examine a process of port development in terms of historic and regulated point of views, and each country’s port is compared with various port models. Results – China has evolved of port governance into 3 stages, which has lead to almost liberalized port management system in process of privatization slogan. Japan has three stages of port development, and key commitments have been done by local government, rather than national one. Korea has also several stages of port reforms, and national government has been deeply involved in port industry, as well as regional government and port authority in certain areas. Conclusions – whatever port management system each countries has taken, it eventually aims to port productivity in country’s port. To adopt most proper port management system may be answer for country to cope with environmental changes around port industry.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. "Developing Best Practices for Promoting Private Sector Investment in Infrastructure: Ports" (2000)[URL]
  2. Ayodeji, Olukoju, "Government and Port Administration in Japan in the Aftermath of the Port and Harbour Law of 1950", The Northern Mariner, 1997, pp.7(4), 65~80
  3. Cheon, S. H., "World Port Institutions and Productivity :Roles of Ownership, Corporate Structure, and Inter-port Competition", PhD, pp.2007
  4. Cullinane, K., "Devolution, Port Governance and Port Performance", pp.331~356 (2007), Elsevier Ltd
  5. Everett, S., "Effective corporatization of ports is a function of effective legislation: legal issues in the existing paradigm", Proceedings of International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) 2005 Conference (CD-ROM) (2005), IAME
  6. Goss, R., "Seaports should not be subsidized", Maritime Policy and Management, 13(2), pp.83~104 (1986)
  7. "Port and Logistics Policy in Northeast Region. Graduate School of International Studies" (2014)[URL]
  8. Guan, Changqian, "China's Port Reform and Development", Transportation Research Record : Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2222, pp.1~9 (2011)
  9. Jung, B. M., "The Direction and Performance of Port Privatization in Korea", Basic Research, 5, pp.40~108 (2003)
  10. "Introduction of Innovation Policy, and Long-term Vision, and Development Strategy of Chinese Ports. Introduction of World Ports" (2009)[URL]
  11. 김진환, "Lessons from British Port Privatisation", 유통과학연구, 13(2), pp.5~13 (2015), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  12. Lee, S. W., "Devolution.Port Governance and Port Performance", pp.357~375 (2007), Elsevier Ltd
  13. Li, Yuqi, "Study on the Effect of the Port Law on the Development of Chinese Ports", PhD, pp.2006
  14. Hong Kong and Shanghai Ports :Challenges, Opportunities and Global Competitiveness, "McKinnon, Alexander", Hong Kong Centre for Maritime and Transportation Law, City University of Hong Kong, 1~30 (2011)
  15. "2. Port Development and Management system" (2015)[URL]
  16. Study on Establishing Law for Management and Operation of Port (Provisional), "MLTMA", Transport and Maritime Affairs, ~ (2012)
  17. 박경희, "한일간 항만관리 형태의 비교분석", 한국항만경제학회지, 22(4), pp.19~38 (2006), 한국항만경제학회
  18. "Port Administration Models, Module 3: Alternative Port Management Structures and Ownership Models" (2015)[URL]
  19. Qiu, Min, "Port Privatisation : the Asia-Pacific Experience", pp.73~93 (2008), Edward Elger Publishing Ltd
  20. Slack, B, "Transformation of Port Terminal Operations: From the Local to the Global", Transport Reviews, 25(1), pp.118~130 (2005)
  21. Stehli, H., "Institute of Shipping Economics", pp.25~35 (1978), Bremen
  22. Takahashi, K., "Research on the Legal Problems of the Port Management System in Japan", Society for Social Management Systems Internet Journal, pp.1~12 (2014), Society for Social Management Systems
  23. Development of Shipping and Ports in North-east Asia, "UNESCAP", Transport and Tourism Division, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, ~ (2004)
  24. Wang, J. J., "Port Governance in China : A Review of Policies in an Era of Internationalising Port Management Practices", Transport Policy, 11(3), pp.237~250 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)