본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

메르스 위험정보유통의 사회적 확산에 관한 SMCRE 모형의 적용과 함의

Applications of SMCRE Model on Social Amplification of MERS Risk Information and its Implications

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose – This article tackles risk communication issues and aims to address the characteristics of MERS risk information distribution in South Korea, and secondly to examine the communicative behavior of the public health authority in terms of the quality of communication strategies. Thirdly, the study attempts to figure out the risk communication to cope with MERS through the applications of SMCRE model in chronological order. We employ the social amplification of risk framework for analyzing the emergent public response as one of the main approaches. Research Design, Data and Methodology – The main framework of this study is theoretically based on the social amplification of risk, which describes signals about risk transmitted and processed by individuals and social groups. The model also reflects the interactions between social groups and institutes about disaster-related risk issues, which are potential amplifiers or attenuators of communication signals. S-M-C-R-E Model is methodologically employed to examine the social amplification for MERS risk information in each period, which we defined operationally. The proposed methodology allows the assessment of effectiveness and ineffectiveness on risk communication to be conceptualized as a countermeasure against disasters. The paper focuses on exploring how social risk amplification can be applied and organized in each stage. Results – The SMCRE model describes the exchange of risk information and is also applied to all forms of communication between stakeholders including public health authority, local government and media. Each factor of risk communication includes source, message, channel, receiver and effect. The results support that the effective risk communication involves not only the improved reliability of public health authority as a key factor of risk communication, but also a close cooperation and good collaboration with local governments. It does not seem to be possible that the government-initiated risk communication based on controllability and management cope effectively with infectious disease in early stage. The results of this study imply that the shared risks between local, regional and national authorities can enhance risk communication system. Conclusions – The study supports that the disparities in how disaster-related risk information is interpreted and coded, have made effective risk communication and public sense-making impeded. Our findings support a more communicative discussion about the role of risk information sharing between governments for the improvement of emergency management and underline the importance of social elements in the risk communication, such as relationship and trust building. Findings suggest that trust building between stakeholders could be added to help explain the processes of social amplification and attenuation of risk. It would be recommended that the continuous risk communication with all the involved stakeholders will be able to help national health promotion policy to be improved regarding emergency management. Furthermore, risk communication has to be a scientific approach for the communication pertaining to potentially sensitive or controversial situations with public concerns and low public trust.

Abstract

Purpose – This article tackles risk communication issues and aims to address the characteristics of MERS risk information distribution in South Korea, and secondly to examine the communicative behavior of the public health authority in terms of the quality of communication strategies. Thirdly, the study attempts to figure out the risk communication to cope with MERS through the applications of SMCRE model in chronological order. We employ the social amplification of risk framework for analyzing the emergent public response as one of the main approaches. Research Design, Data and Methodology – The main framework of this study is theoretically based on the social amplification of risk, which describes signals about risk transmitted and processed by individuals and social groups. The model also reflects the interactions between social groups and institutes about disaster-related risk issues, which are potential amplifiers or attenuators of communication signals. S-M-C-R-E Model is methodologically employed to examine the social amplification for MERS risk information in each period, which we defined operationally. The proposed methodology allows the assessment of effectiveness and ineffectiveness on risk communication to be conceptualized as a countermeasure against disasters. The paper focuses on exploring how social risk amplification can be applied and organized in each stage. Results – The SMCRE model describes the exchange of risk information and is also applied to all forms of communication between stakeholders including public health authority, local government and media. Each factor of risk communication includes source, message, channel, receiver and effect. The results support that the effective risk communication involves not only the improved reliability of public health authority as a key factor of risk communication, but also a close cooperation and good collaboration with local governments. It does not seem to be possible that the government-initiated risk communication based on controllability and management cope effectively with infectious disease in early stage. The results of this study imply that the shared risks between local, regional and national authorities can enhance risk communication system. Conclusions – The study supports that the disparities in how disaster-related risk information is interpreted and coded, have made effective risk communication and public sense-making impeded. Our findings support a more communicative discussion about the role of risk information sharing between governments for the improvement of emergency management and underline the importance of social elements in the risk communication, such as relationship and trust building. Findings suggest that trust building between stakeholders could be added to help explain the processes of social amplification and attenuation of risk. It would be recommended that the continuous risk communication with all the involved stakeholders will be able to help national health promotion policy to be improved regarding emergency management. Furthermore, risk communication has to be a scientific approach for the communication pertaining to potentially sensitive or controversial situations with public concerns and low public trust.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. An, Eun-Young, "Frame research on the risk reports concerning MERS - based on Chosun Ilbo and Hankyoreh Newspaper", Master, pp.2009
  2. Bae, Ja-Hyon, "Problem and solution of national disaster systems", Proceedings of 2015 Fall Conference of the Journal of Association for Local Government Studies (2015)
  3. "MERS information" (2015)[URL]
  4. 최충익, "서울의 전염병 발생 특성에 관한 연구사적 고찰", Crisisonomy, 11(9), pp.119~134 (2015), 위기관리 이론과 실천
  5. 최충익, "중국의 재난위험 정보유통에 관한 사례 연구", 유통과학연구, 14(4), pp.55~66 (2016), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  6. "Police arrest netizen for spreading false MERS rumors" (2015)[URL]
  7. 최재욱, "공중보건 위기관리 대응과 소통체계 구축: 중동호흡기증후군 사태의 경험과 교훈", 대한의사협회지, 58(7), pp.624~634 (2015), 대한의사협회[DOI]
  8. Graham, John D., "How Risks are Identified and Assessed", The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 545, pp.15~24 (1996)
  9. 한동섭, "위험과 커뮤니케이션: 원자력의 사회적 수용에 미치는 커뮤니케이션의 효과: 신뢰성, 효용인식, 위험인식을 매개로", Crisisonomy, 7(2), pp.1~22 (2011), 위기관리 이론과 실천
  10. "Ministry authorities are turning over permission of confirm the MERS infection" (2015)[URL]
  11. "Useless MERS Manual" (2015)[URL]
  12. "Mers fear... "reject to disclose the list of MERS affected-hospital"....continue to raise government distrust" (2015)[URL]
  13. "Reveal 6 MERS affected hospital list" (2015)[URL]
  14. Kasperson, R., "Social Amplification of Risk : a Conceptual Framework", Risk Analysis, 8(2), pp.177~187 (1988)
  15. Kim, Eun-Sung, "Analysis of MERS risk communications limits and social factors. Korea National Institute for Bioethics Policy", Bioethics Forum, 4(3), pp.1~24 (2015)
  16. Kim, Ho-Sub, "Public Administration and Organizational Behavior" (2011), Daeyoung Publishing
  17. "Mayer Park Won-soon, Hold a Emergency Press conference" (2015)[URL]
  18. "A doctor of SAMSUNG Medical Center added MERS confirmed case" (2015)[URL]
  19. "Disclose MERS affected hospital list and map" (2015)[URL]
  20. Kim, Yeon, "Necessity of changement health and medical system after 2015 MERS in Korea : diagnose and solution", Korea Public Administration Forum, 150, pp.22~29 (2015)
  21. Kim, Young-Wook, "Risk. Crisis and Communications" (2008), Communication Books
  22. 김영대, "수정한 SARF를 적용한 위험의 사회적 증폭 메커니즘 분석 - 중동호흡기증후군 사례를 중심으로 -", Crisisonomy, 11(10), pp.63~89 (2015), 위기관리 이론과 실천
  23. Lasswell, H. D., "Mass Communication", pp.117~130 (1948), University of Illinois Press
  24. "MERS Characteristics and Prevention & Control Guidelines" (2014)[URL]
  25. "MERS case Confirmed in Korea" (2015)[URL]
  26. "Release Q&A about MERS" (2015)[URL]
  27. "Add 1 case confirmed, current MERS cases 13" (2015)[URL]
  28. "6 cases more confirmed, current MERS cases 25" (2015)[URL]
  29. "disclose full MERS Hospital list" (2015)[URL]
  30. "MERS quarantine Abandoned... at the airport" (2015)[URL]
  31. 문지효, "외부 사건 충격으로 인한 해외관광객 감소가 서울시 유통산업에 미치는 영향: 2015년 메르스 사태로 인한 경제적 파급효과 분석", 유통연구, 21(1), pp.129~152 (2016), 한국유통학회
  32. "Two patients deaths.... emerging a third generation of transmission" (2015)[URL]
  33. Renn, O., "Social Theories of Risk" (1992), Praeger Publisher
  34. Seo, Ja-Ho, "Necessity of changement health and medical system after 2015 MERS in Korea : restructuring direction and issue", Korea Public Administration Forum, 150, pp.30~37 (2015)
  35. 심준섭, "원자력 발전소에 대한 신뢰, 인식된 위험과 혜택, 그리고 수용성", 한국정책학회보, 18(4), pp.93~132 (2009), 한국정책학회
  36. 손희정, "이대목동병원에서의 메르스 대처경험과 교훈", 병원경영학회지, 20(3), pp.56~63 (2015), 한국병원경영학회
  37. Song, Gun-Won, "Necessity of changement health and medical system after 2015 MERS in Korea : Lesson", Korea Public Administration Forum, 150, pp.4~11 (2015)
  38. 송해룡, "위험커뮤니케이션의 개념화, 구조 분석 및 영역 설정에 관한 연구", 분쟁해결연구, 10(1), pp.65~100 (2012), 분쟁해결연구센터[DOI]
  39. Yang, Hyeon-Jo, "Research on Case Analysis of Risk Communication - With a Focus on Analyzing News Reports on MERS", Master, pp.2016

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)