한국인과 이집트인의 치열궁 형태 비교
Comparison of arch form between Koreans and Egyptians
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구의 목적은 한국인과 이집트인의 Angle씨 I급, II급, III급 부정교합군에서 하악치열궁의 크기와 형태적 특성을 상호 비교 분석하고자 하였다. 한국인 부정교합자 368명(114 Class I, 119 Class II, and 135 Class III)과 이집트인 부정교합자 94명(35 Class I, 32 Class II and 27 Class III)을 대상으로 하였다. 치료 전 하악 치열 모형을 복사한 사진에서 13개의 인접한 접촉면에서 가장 협측에 위치한 점들을 좌표화한 후 하악 치아의 두께 자료에 근거하여 임상 브라켓 점들을 설정하였고 4개의 선 계측과 2개의 비율을 측정하였다. 치열궁 형태를 tapered, ovoid, squared의 3가지로 분류하여 두 인종 간 분포 특성에 관하여 비교하였다. 이집트인은 한국인보다 대구치 간 폭경과 견치 간 폭경이 유의성 있게 좁았으며 (p ＜ 0.001), 대구치 간 장경과 견치 간 장경이 더 짧았다 (p ＜ 0.001). 이집트인에서는 3가지의 치열궁 형태가 동등한 비율로 나타났으나 (p = 0.46), 한국인에서는 square arch form (46.7%)이 가장 빈번하게 나타났고, tapered arch form이 가장 적게 나타났다(18.8%). 본 연구의 결과는 기성품의 초탄성 호선을 선택할 때 인종 간의 차이에 대한 유익한 정보를 제공할 수 있을 것으로 생각된다. (대치교정지 2010;40(5):334-341)
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate morphologic differences in the mandibular arch between Egyptian and Korean subjects. Methods: The Egyptian sample consisted of 94 mandibular casts (35 Class I, 32 Class II and 27 Class III). The Korean sample consisted of 462 mandibular casts (114 Class I, 119 Class II, and 135 Class III). The most facial portion of 13 proximal contact areas was digitized from photocopied images of the mandibular dental arches. Clinical bracket points were calculated for each tooth. The subjects were grouped according to arch form to compare the frequency distribution of the 3 arch forms between the ethnic groups in each Angle classification. Results: Egyptians had significantly narrower intermolar and intercanine widths (p ＜ 0.001), and shallower intermolar and intercanine depths (p ＜ 0.001) than Koreans. There was an even frequency distribution of the 3 arch forms within the Egyptian group (p = 0.46). However, in the Korean group, the most frequent arch form was the square arch form (46.7%), while the frequency of the tapered arch form was significantly lower (18.8%). Conclusions: These results might provide helpful information in evaluating morphologic differences between ethnic groups in selection of preformed superelastic archwires. (Korean J Orthod 2010;40(5):334-341)
참고문헌 (32)
- de la Cruz A, "Long-term changes in arch form after orthodontic treatment and retention", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 107, pp.518~30 (1995)
- Felton JM, "A computerized analysis of the shape and stability of mandibular arch form", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 92, pp.478~83 (1987)
- McLaughlin RP, "Arch form considerations for stability and esthetics", Rev Esp Orthod, 29, pp.46~63 (2000)
- Shapiro PA, "Mandibular dental arch form and dimension: Treatment and postretention changes", Am J Orthod, 66, pp.58~70 (1974)
- Krishnan M, "Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136, pp.675~82 (2009)
- Ferrario VF, "Mathematical definition of the shape of dental arches in human permanent healthy dentitions", Eur J Orthod, 16, pp.287~94 (1994)
- Merz ML, "Tooth diameters and arch perimeters in a black and a white population", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 100, pp.53~8 (1991)
- 이채형, "한국인과 일본인 부정교합자의 하악 치열궁 형태 비교", 대한치과교정학회지, 37(5), pp.376~385 (2007), 대한치과교정학회
- Kunjur J, "Anthropometric analysis of eyebrows and eyelids: an inter-racial study", Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 44, pp.89~93 (2006)
- Behbehani F, "Racial variations in cephalometric analysis between Whites and Kuwaitis", Angle Orthod, 76, pp.406~11 (2006)
- Lee JJ, "Gender and racial variations in cephalometric analysis", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 117, pp.326~9 (1997)
- Abd-el Samad Younes S, "Maxillary arch dimensions in Saudi and Egyptian population sample", Am J Orthod, 85, pp.83~8 (1984)
- Bishara SE, "Cephalometric comparisons of dentofacial parameters between Egyptian and North American adolescents", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 97, pp.413~21 (1990)
- Sarhan OA, "Maxillary arch dimensions in Egyptian and British children", Odontostomatol Trop, 10, pp.101~6 (1987)
- Kook YA, "Sinclair PM. Comparison of arch forms between Korean and North American white populations", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 126, pp.680~6 (2004)
- [URL]
- ". Arab League. Available"[URL]
- Andrews LF, "Straight wire - the concept and appliance" (1989), LA Wells
- Nummikoski P, "Dental and mandibular arch widths in three ethnic groups in Texas: a radiographic study", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 65, pp.609~17 (1988)
- Collins BP, "Arch form in American blacks and whites with malocclusions", J Tenn Dent Assoc, 78, pp.15~8 (1998)
- Burris BG, "Maxillary arch size and shape in American blacks and whites", Angle Orthod, 70, pp.297~302 (2000)
- BeGole EA, "Application of the cubic spline function in the description of dental arch form", J Dent Res, 59, pp.1549~56 (1980)
- Bonwill WGA, "Geometrical and mechanical laws of articulation", Trans Odont Soc Penn, 119~33 (1885)
- Camporesi M, "Thin-plate spline analysis of arch form in a Southern European population with an ideal natural occlusion", Eur J Orthod, 28, pp.135~40 (2006)
- Ferrario VF, "Maxillary versus mandibular arch form differences in human permanent dentition assessed by Euclidean-distance matrix analysis", Arch Oral Biol, 39, pp.135~9 (1994)
- Noroozi H, "The dental arch form revisited", Angle Orthod, 71, pp.386~9 (2001)
- Taner TU, "Evaluation of dental arch width and form changes after orthodontic treatment and retention with a new computerized method", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 126, pp.463~74 (2004)
- Nojima K, "A comparative study of Caucasian and Japanese mandibular clinical arch forms", Angle Orthod, 71, pp.195~200 (2001)
- DeKock WH, "Dental arch depth and width studied longitudinally from 12 years of age to adulthood", Am J Orthod, 62, pp.56~66 (1972)
- Haralabakis NB, "The correlation of sexual dimorphism in tooth size and arch form", World J Orthod, 7, pp.254~60 (2006)
- Braun S, "The form of the human dental arch", Angle Orthod, 68, pp.29~36 (1998)
- Kook YA, "Overjet at the anterior and posterior segments: three-dimensional analysis of arch coordination", Angle Orthod, 79, pp.495~501 (2009)